Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer modification, and the benchmark data for the Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the Intel Arc B370 reveals a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics solution. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings show a clear pattern: this combo is designed for 1080p play at lower presets, with performance degrading sharply as resolution increases. The data indicates a fundamental imbalance where the CPU has ample headroom, but the GPU, which sits at the 5th percentile among all tested GPUs, becomes the limiting factor at nearly every measurable point.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lies. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 80 FPS at 1920x1080 to 53 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 27 FPS, and then plummets to 29 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 64% loss in performance from 1080p to 4K at Low settings. The scaling is similarly punishing at Medium settings, where the average drops from 63 FPS at 1080p to 41 FPS at 1440p, and then to 23 FPS at 4K. At High settings, the numbers go from 50 FPS at 1080p to 33 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 18 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most severe degradation, starting at 39 FPS at 1080p, falling to 26 FPS at 1440p, and reaching an unplayable 14 FPS at 4K.

These results indicate that the Intel Arc B370 is the primary limiting component. The pattern of steep declines with each resolution increase is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of pixel throughput and memory bandwidth. The Arc B370 features 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS. These specifications are modest, and the benchmark results confirm that the GPU cannot sustain playable frame rates at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 14 FPS is particularly telling, as it is less than half the 1080p Low result of 80 FPS.

The data suggests that the CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, is not the limiting factor at these resolutions. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see less variation between resolutions, as the CPU workload would remain relatively constant while the GPU workload scales with pixel count. Instead, the massive FPS drops with resolution point squarely at the GPU. The i5-12400F has a passmark_multithread score of 19433 and a passmark_single_thread score of 3481, indicating solid processing power. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 5912 and 3dmark_single_thread score of 909 further support that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 80 FPS average suggests the CPU can handle the game's logic and draw calls, but the GPU is already working near its limit.

The gap between 1440p and 4K is also instructive. At Medium settings, the difference between 1440p (41 FPS) and 4K (23 FPS) is 18 FPS, which is a 44% drop. At High settings, the drop from 1440p (33 FPS) to 4K (18 FPS) is 15 FPS, a 45% reduction. This consistent percentage drop across settings indicates that the GPU is scaling linearly with pixel count, which is typical for a GPU that is fully saturated. The lack of any min FPS data for most resolutions (only Medium settings have min/max values) suggests that the frame pacing might be inconsistent, but the average numbers are low enough to be the primary concern.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 12380 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1680 in Cinebench R23 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 9472 multicore and 1964 single-core. The 3dmark scores show a progression from 1699 at 2 threads to 5912 at max threads, indicating good scaling with thread count.

Given these specifications, the CPU is more than adequate for Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification that typically relies on single-thread performance for game logic and physics. The i5-12400F's boost clock of 4.40 GHz and single-thread score of 3481 in Passmark suggest it can handle the game's primary thread without issue. The benchmark data supports this: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 80 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit for this game. However, as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU's role diminishes.

The percentileVsAllCpus of 73 indicates that the i5-12400F performs better than 73% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with an avgScore of 19047 and a deltaPct of 0, the Intel Core 3 201E with an avgScore of 19056 and a deltaPct of -0.1, the Intel Core i5-1335U with an avgScore of 18982 and a deltaPct of 0.3, and the AMD EPYC 7773X with an avgScore of 18979 and a deltaPct of 0.3. These scores are all within a narrow range, suggesting that the i5-12400F's overall CPU performance is comparable to these parts. The avgBenchmarkScore for the CPU is 19039.

In the context of Fivem, the CPU's 12 threads are likely underutilized, as the game may not scale well beyond a few cores. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 5895 and 3dmark_8_threads score of 4779 suggest that the CPU has headroom in multi-threaded workloads, but this headroom is irrelevant when the GPU is the limiting factor. The benchmark results show that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 14, which is so low that it is unlikely the CPU is waiting on anything; the GPU is simply unable to render frames fast enough. The CPU role in this combo is to provide enough single-thread performance to avoid being a bottleneck at 1080p, which it does, but the GPU's limitations prevent the combo from achieving high frame rates at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 80 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. This is the only setting that achieves a frame rate that could be considered smooth for competitive multiplayer play. The Medium preset at 1080p delivers 63 FPS, which is still playable, but with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS, there is noticeable frame time variance. The High preset at 1080p drops to 50 FPS, which is borderline for a fast-paced multiplayer game. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 39 FPS, which is likely too choppy for most players.

At 2560x1440, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset averages 53 FPS, which is playable but below the 60 FPS threshold that many players prefer. The Medium preset averages 41 FPS with a min of 35 and max of 48, which is marginal. The High preset drops to 33 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 26 FPS. These results indicate that 1440p gaming is only viable at Low or possibly Medium settings. At 3840x2160, no preset achieves a playable frame rate. The Low preset averages 29 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. 4K is not a realistic option for this combo.

The data suggests that the best experience for this combo is at 1080p with the Low preset, which provides 80 FPS. This is the only configuration that fully utilizes the CPU's potential while keeping the GPU within its comfort zone. If a player prefers higher visual quality, the Medium preset at 1080p offers a compromise at 63 FPS, but the frame rate dips to 54 FPS minimum, which could cause stutters in intense multiplayer moments. The High preset at 1080p is not recommended, as the 50 FPS average is below the typical target for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset should be avoided entirely, as it drops below 40 FPS.

For players who insist on 1440p, the Low preset at 53 FPS is the only reasonable choice. The Medium preset at 41 FPS is playable but not ideal. The High and Ultra presets at 1440p are not recommended due to frame rates in the 20s and 30s. The measured data shows a clear pattern: this combo is best suited for 1080p Low or Medium settings, and any attempt to push higher resolutions or quality presets results in a significant performance penalty. The Arc B370's 25 W TDP and IGP form factor suggest it is designed for efficiency rather than high-end gaming, and the benchmark results confirm this.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2762 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the bottom 8% of all combinations in the database. The rank reflects the GPU's poor performance relative to other graphics cards, as the CPU is significantly more capable. The i5-12400F has a percentileVsAllCpus of 73, meaning it outperforms 73% of CPUs, while the Arc B370 has a percentileVsAllGpus of 5, meaning it outperforms only 5% of GPUs. This stark contrast highlights the imbalance of this pairing.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the database include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with an avgScore of 1186 and a deltaPct of -0.2, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 with an avgScore of 1190 and a deltaPct of -0.5, the AMD Radeon HD 7650M with an avgScore of 1192 and a deltaPct of -0.7, and the AMD FirePro M2000 with an avgScore of 1168 and a deltaPct of 1.4. The Arc B370's avgBenchmarkScore is 1184, which is within a few points of these older, lower-end GPUs. This comparison places the Arc B370 in the same performance tier as GPUs from over a decade ago, which explains the low combo rank.

The combo rank of 2762 out of 3005 means that only 243 combos perform worse in Fivem. This is a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations. The CPU's high percentile rank does not compensate for the GPU's low percentile rank in a game like Fivem, which is GPU-bound at higher resolutions. Even at 1080p Low, where the CPU is most utilized, the combo only achieves 80 FPS, which is below what many other combos with better GPUs would achieve. The data shows that this combo is positioned at the low end of the performance spectrum, and users should temper their expectations accordingly.

The measured FPS data reinforces this ranking. At 1080p Low, the 80 FPS average is respectable, but at 4K Ultra, the 14 FPS average is among the lowest in the database. The combo rank reflects the overall performance across all tested settings and resolutions, and the dominance of low frame rates at higher resolutions drags the rank down. The i5-12400F is a capable mid-range CPU, but the Arc B370 is an entry-level GPU, and the combination produces results that are consistent with the GPU's 5th percentile ranking.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Low settings provides the highest average frame rate at 80 FPS. This is the only configuration that achieves a frame rate above 70 FPS. At 1440p, the Low preset drops to 53 FPS, and at 4K, even Low settings only reach 29 FPS.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400F or the Intel Arc B370 the bottleneck in this combo?

A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting factor. The FPS drops sharply as resolution increases, from 80 FPS at 1080p Low to 29 FPS at 4K Low, which is a pattern consistent with GPU saturation. The CPU has a percentileVsAllCpus of 73, while the GPU has a percentileVsAllGpus of 5, further confirming the GPU as the bottleneck.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 has an avgBenchmarkScore of 1184. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 with a score of 1186 and a deltaPct of -0.2, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 with a score of 1190 and a deltaPct of -0.5, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M with a score of 1192 and a deltaPct of -0.7. These scores are all within a few points of each other.

Q: What are the measured FPS numbers at 1080p for this combo?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS is 80 for Low, 63 for Medium, 50 for High, and 39 for Ultra settings. The Medium preset has a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. The other presets do not have min/max data recorded.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: No. The highest average frame rate at 3840x2160 is 29 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. All 4K results are below playable thresholds.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2762 out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 8% of all combinations. This low rank is primarily due to the GPU's performance, which is at the 5th percentile among all GPUs.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides specific average frame rates for each resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 80 FPS, making it the fastest configuration tested. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. The High preset at 1080p averages 50 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 39 FPS. These numbers show a clear degradation as quality increases, with a 41 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 53 FPS, which is a 27 FPS drop from 1080p Low. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. The High preset at 1440p averages 33 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 26 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 27 FPS, which is smaller than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 29 FPS, the Medium preset averages 23 FPS (with a min of 20 and max of 26), the High preset averages 18 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 14 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 15 FPS, indicating that the GPU is severely constrained at this resolution. The data shows that the Medium preset is the only one at 4K with recorded min/max values, which are 20 FPS and 26 FPS respectively, confirming the low performance ceiling.

The overall pattern across all resolutions is that the Low preset consistently provides the highest frame rate, followed by Medium, then High, and finally Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows as resolution increases, from 41 FPS at 1080p to 27 FPS at 1440p to 15 FPS at 4K. This suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so overwhelmed that changing quality settings has less impact. The measured FPS breakdown confirms that this combo is only viable at 1080p Low or possibly Medium, with all other configurations resulting in frame rates below 60 FPS.