Fivem

Fivem

AVERAGE FPS
144
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 144 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 59 76 96 117
1440p QHD 106 135 171 192
1080p Full HD 163 190 203 226

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Ultra 59
2560x1440 Low 192
2560x1440 Medium 171
2560x1440 High 135
2560x1440 Ultra 106
1920x1080 Low 226
1920x1080 Medium 203
1920x1080 High 190
1920x1080 Ultra 163

Fivem with Intel Core i5-10400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER presents a fascinating study in system balancing for Fivem. This combination, ranking 287th out of 1792 tested combos, places it in the top 16% of all configurations, a strong position that suggests the hardware is well-matched for this specific multiplayer title. The data reveals a system that excels at high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, but which also exhibits clear signs of a CPU bottleneck at higher resolutions that demands careful settings management.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Comet Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and can boost up to 4.30 GHz, providing the raw frequency needed for Fivem's often single-thread-heavy workload. Its performance profile, reflected in an average benchmark score of 14168, places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a competent, mid-range processor that holds its own against a wide field of competitors. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache is also a notable asset, helping to keep frequently accessed game data close to the cores.

In Fivem, the processor's influence is most apparent when examining the frame rate scaling across resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 225.9 FPS. This high figure suggests that at this resolution and settings level, the CPU is capable of feeding frames quickly enough to avoid being the primary constraint. However, the data also shows that the i5-10400F's 6 cores can be a limiting factor. The 3dmark benchmark scores for this chip tell a story of diminishing returns: the 2-thread score is 1350, the 4-thread score is 2560, and the 8-thread score is 3929. The jump from 2560 to 3929 is significant, but the scaling from the 8-thread score of 3929 to the max-thread score of 4735 is less impressive, suggesting that while the processor has 12 threads, its performance gains flatten out as more cores are utilized. This implies that in a game like Fivem, which may not perfectly utilize all 12 threads, the processor's single-core strength and frequency are more critical than its multi-core capabilities.

The benchmark results indicate that the i5-10400F is a serviceable partner for the RTX 4080 SUPER, but it is not a perfect match. While it can drive high frame rates at lower resolutions, the data suggests it will struggle to keep up with the GPU's raw power at higher settings, as seen in the 4K Ultra results. The processor's nearest rivals, such as the AMD EPYC 7552, which is only 0.4% faster in average score, and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, which is 0.8% slower, highlight that this chip sits in a performance tier where minor differences can affect overall system balance. This is a processor that provides a solid foundation, but it may be the component that prevents the system from achieving its absolute maximum potential in CPU-intensive scenarios.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how different settings presets impact performance. For players seeking the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset is the clear winner. At 1080p, it delivers 225.9 FPS, and even at 4K, it maintains a playable 117.4 FPS. However, this comes at the cost of visual fidelity. The Ultra preset, in contrast, offers the most visually demanding experience but significantly reduces performance, with the system dropping to 58.7 FPS at 4K, which may be below the threshold for a smooth experience on a high-refresh-rate monitor.

The most balanced experience appears to be the High preset. At 1440p, it delivers a robust 135.2 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, while at 4K it still manages a respectable 75.9 FPS. This suggests that the High preset provides a good compromise between visual quality and performance, leveraging the GPU's power without overwhelming the CPU. The Medium preset also offers a compelling option, with 170.6 FPS at 1440p and 95.5 FPS at 4K, representing a significant performance uplift over High with only a modest reduction in visual quality. Given the data, the High preset at 1440p appears to be the optimal choice for balancing a high frame rate with better visuals than Low or Medium. For 4K users, the Low preset is the only way to get close to triple-digit frame rates, but High remains a viable option for those who prioritize image quality over a few extra frames per second.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-10400F compare to its nearest rivals in terms of overall processing power?

A: The i5-10400F has an average benchmark score of 14168. This places it 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7552, which scores 14115, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, which scores 14277. It is also 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-8500 and 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546.

Q: What is the best settings preset for achieving a high frame rate at 1440p with this combo?

A: The measured data shows that at 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves the highest frame rate at 192.2 FPS. For a balance of performance and visual quality, the Medium preset offers 170.6 FPS, while the High preset delivers 135.2 FPS.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves an average of 117.4 FPS, while the Ultra preset only manages 58.7 FPS. This represents a 58.7 FPS difference, showing that the Ultra preset nearly halves the performance compared to Low.

Q: What is the GPU's score in the Passmark G3D benchmark, and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 34245 in the Passmark G3D benchmark. This makes it 0.2% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, which scores 53489 in the overall average benchmark, and 2.1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7700S.

Q: Does the CPU's multi-threaded performance scale well with its thread count?

A: The 3dmark scores show diminishing returns. The 2-thread score is 1350, the 4-thread score is 2560, and the 8-thread score is 3929. However, the max-thread score is only 4735, indicating that performance scaling flattens significantly beyond 8 threads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is 999 USD.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER achieves a rank of 287 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the top 16% of all system configurations tested, a strong showing that indicates the pairing is well-suited for this game. This rank confirms the GPU's raw power, which can compensate for some of the CPU's limitations in certain scenarios. The rank also implies that while the i5-10400F is not a top-tier processor, it is more than capable of holding its own when paired with a high-end graphics card in this specific title. The data suggests that a significant majority of the 1792 tested combos perform worse, meaning this system will deliver a better-than-average experience for most users. However, the fact that it is not in the top 100 indicates that there are more powerful combinations available that can push even higher frame rates, likely featuring newer, higher-core-count CPUs that can better feed the RTX 4080 SUPER at lower resolutions.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a powerhouse based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial 736.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This large frame buffer is particularly useful for Fivem, which can have many custom assets and textures, ensuring that the GPU does not run out of memory even at 4K Ultra settings. The GPU's core is clocked at 2295 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost, and it contains 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, making it an exceptionally capable rendering engine. Its 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53610, confirms its position as a top-tier graphics card.

The benchmark results show that the GPU is the dominant force in this system. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 225.9 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit. However, as resolution increases, the GPU's workload becomes more demanding. The transition from 1080p Ultra at 163.1 FPS to 1440p Ultra at 105.5 FPS shows a significant drop, but the system still maintains high frame rates. The most telling data point is at 4K Ultra, where the system drops to 58.7 FPS. This is not a sign of GPU weakness; rather, it suggests that the CPU is struggling to provide the necessary data to keep the powerful GPU fully utilized at this high resolution and settings combination. The RTX 4080 SUPER is clearly capable of rendering the scene, but it is being held back by the i5-10400F's processing limits.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across all settings and resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 225.9 FPS. Moving to Medium settings, the frame rate drops to 203.3 FPS. The High preset delivers 189.6 FPS, while the Ultra preset, the most demanding, still manages a very high 163.1 FPS. This resolution is clearly where this combo shines, offering a great experience even at the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Low preset yields 192.2 FPS, which is a minor drop from the 1080p result. The Medium preset follows with 170.6 FPS. The High preset, which many consider the sweet spot, provides 135.2 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, sees a more significant drop to 105.5 FPS, showing the impact of the increased resolution.

At 3840x2160, the CPU bottleneck becomes more apparent. The Low preset achieves 117.4 FPS, which is still very playable. The Medium preset drops to 95.5 FPS. The High preset falls to 75.9 FPS, and the Ultra preset is the only one to dip below 60 FPS, averaging 58.7 FPS. This data shows that 4K gaming is possible with this combo, but only with reduced settings to maintain high frame rates.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals critical insights into the system's bottleneck. At the Low preset, the frame rate drops from 225.9 FPS at 1080p to 192.2 FPS at 1440p and then to 117.4 FPS at 4K. This is a 48% drop from 1080p to 4K. In contrast, at the Ultra preset, the frame rate drops from 163.1 FPS at 1080p to 105.5 FPS at 1440p and then to 58.7 FPS at 4K, representing a 64% reduction. The fact that the percentage drop is much larger at Ultra settings than at Low settings is a classic indicator of a CPU bottleneck.

When the settings are low, the GPU is not fully taxed, so the CPU can keep up, and the frame rate is high. As resolution increases, the GPU's workload increases, but the CPU's frame generation rate remains the same. At 4K Low, the GPU is still not fully utilized, so the CPU is the main limiter, but the frame rate is still high. At 4K Ultra, the GPU is working much harder, but the CPU cannot provide data fast enough to keep it fully occupied, leading to a disproportionately large performance drop. This analysis indicates that the Intel Core i5-10400F is the limiting factor in this system, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The RTX 4080 SUPER has more performance to give, but it is being constrained by the processor's inability to keep pace with its rendering capabilities. The data suggests that upgrading the CPU would yield significant performance gains in Fivem, especially for 4K gaming.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-10400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2900 MHz
Boost Clock 4300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1200
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2550 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-10400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER in Fivem

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 117.4
3840x2160 Medium 95.5
3840x2160 High 75.9
3840x2160 Ultra 58.7
2560x1440 Low 192.2
2560x1440 Medium 170.6
2560x1440 High 135.2
2560x1440 Ultra 105.5
1920x1080 Low 225.9
1920x1080 Medium 203.3
1920x1080 High 189.6
1920x1080 Ultra 163.1

Fivem with ii5-10400F + Other GPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fivem with RTX 4080 SUPER + Other CPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-10400F + RTX 4080 SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.