Fivem

The Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 580 pairing in Fivem presents a clear case of GPU-limited performance at higher resolutions, but the data also reveals a notable CPU influence at lower settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions, the role of the processor, and how this specific combination stacks up against the broader benchmark database.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a steep and consistent penalty as resolution increases, which is typical for a GPU with the RX 580's specifications. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 82.5 FPS, but this drops to 57.0 FPS at 1440p and further to 32.4 FPS at 4K. This represents a 31% decrease from 1080p to 1440p and a 61% decrease from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the rendering pipeline becomes heavily constrained by the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth at higher pixel counts.

The scaling pattern across settings tells a more nuanced story. At 4K, the difference between Low (32.4 FPS) and High (21.5 FPS) is substantial, with Ultra falling to 16.1 FPS. This 2x gap between the lowest and highest presets at 4K demonstrates that the RX 580's 256-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are being saturated, making the graphics card the definitive limiting component. The GPU's score of 8813 in Passmark G3D and its 53rd percentile ranking among all GPUs support this interpretation, as it is a mid-range part struggling with the pixel workload.

At 1080p, the scaling is less dramatic but still significant. Low (82.5 FPS) to High (53.4 FPS) shows a 35% drop, while Ultra (39.1 FPS) is less than half of Low. The fact that 1080p Low nearly doubles 4K Low suggests that the RX 580 has enough raw compute to handle the game at lower resolutions, but the pixel throughput and texture fill rate (193.0 GTexel/s) become the bottleneck as resolution climbs.

Interestingly, the 1440p results sit almost exactly between the 1080p and 4K figures for each preset. For example, Medium delivers 65.3 FPS at 1080p, 41.9 FPS at 1440p, and 24.1 FPS at 4K. This near-linear scaling with pixel count indicates that the game is not hitting any memory capacity limits—the 8 GB GDDR5 buffer is sufficient even at 4K—but is instead limited by the GPU's compute throughput. The data suggests that for a smoother experience, users should prioritize resolution over settings, as dropping from High to Low at 1440p yields a 51% FPS increase (37.7 to 57.0), whereas dropping from High to Medium only yields 11% (37.7 to 41.9).

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, built on a 14 nm process. Its base clock of 2.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.30 GHz provide solid single-thread performance, which is critical for Fivem's multiplayer scenarios that often involve physics calculations and script processing. In synthetic tests, the CPU scores 688 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1453 in cinebench_r23_singlecore, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs.

However, the measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is not the primary constraint in most tested configurations. At 1080p Low, the system hits 82.5 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's practical limit for this game engine, but the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 8813 and its 53rd percentile ranking indicate that the graphics card is the weaker component overall. The CPU's multithreaded capabilities are strong—scoring 10297 in cinebench_r23_multicore and 12115 in passmark_multithread—but Fivem does not appear to scale well beyond a few cores based on the resolution scaling patterns.

The relationship between CPU and GPU becomes evident when comparing the 1080p Low result to the 4K Low result. The CPU can theoretically push more frames, but the GPU's rendering limits cap the output. The fact that 1080p Low (82.5 FPS) is only 2.5x the 4K Low (32.4 FPS), while the pixel count difference is 4x, indicates that the CPU is still contributing some overhead at lower resolutions. This is consistent with the CPU's 3dmark_16_threads score of 4748 and its ability to maintain high frame rates in less GPU-intensive scenes.

The i5-10400F's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD EPYC 7552 (0.4% higher average score) and the Intel Core i5-8500 (1.1% lower average score). The 10400F's 12 threads and higher boost clock relative to these competitors help it maintain smooth gameplay in Fivem's busy city areas, but the data cannot isolate CPU-specific FPS figures. The evidence points to a balanced pairing where the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck as resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows 1080p as the most viable option. At Low settings, the combo achieves 82.5 FPS, and at Medium it holds 65.3 FPS. At 1440p, the best result is 57.0 FPS on Low, while 4K tops out at 32.4 FPS on Low, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth multiplayer gameplay.

Q: How does the RX 580 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 580's average benchmark score is 13559, which is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (0% delta) and slightly above the GeForce GTX 950 (0.1% faster). It sits 1.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro 455 and 1.1% below the NVIDIA P106-090. This places it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?

A: Based on the resolution scaling, the CPU does not appear to bottleneck the GPU at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 82.5 FPS, which is likely CPU-limited, but the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking and the steep FPS drops at 4K indicate the RX 580 is the primary limiter. The i5-10400F's 73rd percentile CPU ranking suggests it has headroom.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The measured data shows a 43.4 FPS difference. Low settings produce 82.5 FPS, while Ultra produces 39.1 FPS, representing a 53% reduction in frame rate. This indicates that Ultra settings impose a heavy load on the GPU's shading units and texture units.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1666 out of 1792 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 7% of all systems tested. This low ranking reflects the RX 580's mid-range performance and the overall age of both components, though the CPU's 73rd percentile ranking helps mitigate the GPU's limitations.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for higher resolutions?

A: The data suggests yes. The near-linear FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K (e.g., High settings: 53.4 to 37.7 to 21.5 FPS) indicates the GPU is compute-limited, not memory-limited. The 8 GB GDDR5 buffer with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth appears adequate for Fivem even at 4K, as there are no anomalous drops that would indicate memory swapping.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 580 combination holds the 1666th position out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 7% of the database. This ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU's performance ceiling, as the RX 580's 53rd percentile standing among all GPUs drags the overall score down. The CPU, by contrast, sits in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, showing that the processor is a relatively strong component in this pairing.

The combination's measured FPS numbers align with its low rank. At 1080p, even the best-case Low preset (82.5 FPS) is only marginally above the 60 FPS threshold, and the more realistic High preset (53.4 FPS) falls below it. At 1440p, all presets fail to reach 60 FPS, with the best being Low at 57.0 FPS. At 4K, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates, with even Low settings producing just 32.4 FPS. These figures place the combo well below the median performance of the 1792 tested systems.

The ranking also reflects the age of the components. The i5-10400F was released in April 2020, while the RX 580 dates back to April 2017. The GPU's nearest rivals include the GeForce GTX 570 and GTX 950, which are older architectures, but the RX 580's performance is still competitive with those parts. However, the 1792-combo database includes many newer, higher-end systems that push the average FPS up, making this pairing's rank disproportionately low despite its functional performance at 1080p.

For context, the CPU's nearest rivals—such as the AMD EPYC 7552 and Intel Core i5-8500—have similar average scores, but they are paired with different GPUs in the database. The 10400F's 6 cores and 12 threads provide enough computational power for Fivem's multiplayer load, but the overall combo ranking is a reflection of the GPU's inability to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings. Users of this pairing should expect to play at 1080p with Medium or Low settings to achieve playable framerates, as the data shows this is the only resolution where the system can approach 60 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's resolution and frame rate targets. At 1080p, the Medium preset offers the best balance, delivering 65.3 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth multiplayer gameplay. This represents a 22% improvement over High (53.4 FPS) while only sacrificing some visual fidelity. Low settings at 1080p (82.5 FPS) provide the highest headroom, but Medium is the practical choice for a playable experience with acceptable visuals.

At 1440p, the situation becomes more challenging. The Low preset (57.0 FPS) is the only configuration that comes close to 60 FPS, and it may be acceptable for users who prioritize frame rate over visual quality. Medium (41.9 FPS) and High (37.7 FPS) are both playable but will feel less responsive, especially in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. Ultra (25.0 FPS) is not recommended at this resolution, as the drop below 30 FPS will be noticeable.

For 4K, none of the presets achieve playable frame rates. Low (32.4 FPS) is the best option, but it still falls below the 60 FPS target and even below the 30 FPS minimum for smooth gameplay in many cases. Medium (24.1 FPS), High (21.5 FPS), and Ultra (16.1 FPS) are all too slow for competitive play. Users with 4K displays should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p or 1080p, as the data clearly shows the RX 580 cannot handle Fivem at 4K with any reasonable quality setting.

The Ultra preset is consistently the worst performer at every resolution, providing no playable results. At 1080p Ultra (39.1 FPS), the frame rate is 40% lower than Medium (65.3 FPS) and 52% lower than Low (82.5 FPS). The visual improvements from Ultra are unlikely to justify this performance penalty for most users. The recommended approach is to start with Medium at 1080p and adjust downward if frame rate issues arise, as this preset provides the best compromise between visual quality and performance based on the measured data.