Fivem

Fivem, a multiplayer modification platform built on Grand Theft Auto V, presents a unique performance profile for the Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the Intel Arc B370. The measured data shows a system that is consistently playable at 1080p with adjusted settings, but which struggles significantly at higher resolutions. This analysis walks through the measured FPS results, settings recommendations, and the division of labor between the CPU and GPU.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data for this configuration reveals a clear hierarchy of performance across the four tested settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 80 FPS, which is the highest raw frame rate recorded for this combo at any resolution. The Medium preset follows at 63 FPS average, with a reported variance between 54 and 72 FPS. High settings produce an average of 50 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to an average of 39 FPS. For a smooth multiplayer experience, the data suggests that the Low preset is the only option that consistently maintains a frame rate above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended choice for competitive play where responsiveness is paramount.

However, the choice is not purely about maximum frame rate. The Medium preset, with its 63 FPS average, offers a more visually detailed experience while still staying above the 60 FPS line on average. The minimum reported FPS of 54 for Medium is a consideration, as it indicates potential dips below the 60 FPS target during intense scenes. The Low preset, with no reported minimum, is likely more stable. The High and Ultra presets, while visually richer, fall below the 60 FPS mark, which can lead to a less fluid experience in a fast-paced multiplayer environment.

At 2560x1440, the situation changes dramatically. The Low preset averages 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. Medium averages 41 FPS, High averages 33 FPS, and Ultra averages 26 FPS. None of these presets provide a consistently smooth experience at this resolution. The best experience at 1440p, based on the data, would be the Low preset, but users must accept a frame rate below the ideal threshold. At 3840x2160, all presets produce results that are largely unplayable for a demanding multiplayer title. The Low preset averages 29 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. These frame rates are too low for a responsive experience. Therefore, the optimal configuration for this hardware combination is to run the game at 1920x1080 with the Low or Medium preset, depending on one's preference for visual quality versus a higher average frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i3-12100F and Intel Arc B370 combination is ranked 2762nd out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places the configuration in the bottom 8% of all tested systems, indicating that it is a low-performing setup for this specific game. The data shows that this combo is not suited for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gameplay. The rank is a holistic measure that considers the performance across all tested settings and resolutions.

This low ranking is a direct consequence of the hardware's measured capabilities. The GPU's benchmark score places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and the CPU is in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. The combination of a relatively weak GPU and a mid-range CPU results in a system that is heavily limited in Fivem, particularly as resolution increases. The data suggests that while the CPU has enough headroom for lower resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 1440p and 4K, dragging the overall combo ranking down. Gamers with this specific hardware pairing should manage expectations, as the benchmark results clearly indicate that this is not a configuration designed for high-end multiplayer performance.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) from Intel's Arc Graphics-M series, based on the Panther Lake chip and Xe3-LPG architecture. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output pipelines. Its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's main memory for graphics operations, with bandwidth that is "System Dependent."

The GPU's performance in Fivem is a critical limiting factor. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1184, which places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to that of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which has a score of 1186, a difference of -0.2%. This comparison to a legacy mobile GPU underscores the Arc B370's limited graphical horsepower. The direct consequence of this is seen in the measured FPS. The GPU is simply not powerful enough to handle the rendering load of Fivem at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, it can produce 80 FPS, but as the resolution increases, the rendering workload grows exponentially, and the GPU's performance collapses. The data indicates that the Arc B370 is the decisive factor in the poor performance at 1440p and 4K, as the CPU is unable to compensate for the GPU's lack of fill rate and shader processing power.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Fivem with this hardware?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution that provides a playable experience. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves an average of 80 FPS, and the Medium preset achieves 63 FPS. At higher resolutions, the average FPS drops below 53 FPS even on Low settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: No. The benchmark results at 3840x2160 show that even the Low preset only manages an average of 29 FPS, which is not smooth enough for a multiplayer game. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages only 14 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU more important for this game's performance at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the data suggests the GPU is still the primary constraint, but the CPU is sufficient. The CPU is in the 68th percentile and has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, which allows the GPU to reach its maximum potential of 80 FPS on Low settings. The performance drop from Low to Ultra at the same resolution is a strong indicator of the GPU's influence.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Arc B370's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 is nearly identical to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570's score of 1186, a delta of -0.2%. It is also very close to the ATI Radeon HD 5770's score of 1190, a delta of -0.5%. This indicates it is roughly in the same performance tier as these older, lower-end cards.

Q: What is the expected frame time variance at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The data for 2560x1440 on Medium settings shows an average FPS of 41, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48. This indicates a fairly wide variance of 13 FPS, which could lead to noticeable stuttering.

Q: Is the reported performance data measured or estimated?

A: The data is measured. The `dataIsMeasured` field is set to `true`, indicating that the FPS figures are the result of actual testing, not simulation or estimation.

Resolution Scaling

The performance degradation from 1080p to 4K is severe and reveals a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-limited. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 80. Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 53, a decrease of 33.75%. At 3840x2160, the average FPS further plummets to 29, which is a 63.75% reduction from the 1080p figure. This trend is consistent across all settings presets.

For example, on Medium settings, the average FPS goes from 63 at 1080p, to 41 at 1440p, and finally to 23 at 4K. This shows a linear relationship between the number of pixels and the frame rate, which is a classic symptom of a GPU bottleneck. The Intel Arc B370, with its system-shared memory and low performance percentile, is unable to keep up with the increasing pixel count. The CPU, an Intel Core i3-12100F with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, is not the limiting factor here because the workload is primarily on the graphics processor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would see a more consistent frame rate across resolutions. Instead, the frame rate drops proportionally with the resolution increase, confirming that the GPU's rendering capabilities are exhausted. The data strongly indicates that this system should be used at 1080p for any acceptable level of performance in Fivem.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S architecture. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a 12 MB shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 11860 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1674 in single-core, placing it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-9500, has an average score of 13452, which is 0.3% higher.

In the context of Fivem, the CPU's role is to manage game logic, physics, and AI, as well as to feed the GPU with draw calls. The data suggests that the Core i3-12100F is adequate for this task at 1080p. When paired with the Arc B370, the CPU is capable of pushing the GPU to its maximum performance. The jump from 39 FPS at 1080p Ultra to 80 FPS at 1080p Low demonstrates that the CPU is not holding back the GPU; it is the GPU's own limitations that are dictating the frame rate. As the resolution increases, the CPU's workload per frame becomes less significant relative to the GPU's rendering time. Therefore, the CPU is not the source of the poor performance at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is sufficient to support the GPU's output, but the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing. The data shows that the CPU has the headroom to handle the game's logic and is not a limiting factor in this configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured FPS data for the Intel Core i3-12100F and Intel Arc B370 combination in Fivem.

At 1920x1080:

• Low: The average FPS is 80. This is the highest recorded performance for this combo and is the only setting that provides a clear margin above the 60 FPS target.
• Medium: The average FPS is 63, with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72. This is a playable average, but the minimum indicates potential for dips.
• High: The average FPS is 50. This drops below the 60 FPS threshold and may feel less smooth.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 39. This is the lowest performance at 1080p and is not recommended for a responsive experience.

At 2560x1440:

• Low: The average FPS is 53. This is below the 60 FPS target and may not be ideal for fast-paced multiplayer.
• Medium: The average FPS is 41, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48. This shows significant instability.
• High: The average FPS is 33. This is a substantial drop from the 1080p High setting.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 26. This is generally too low for comfortable play.

At 3840x2160:

• Low: The average FPS is 29. This is not a playable frame rate for a multiplayer game.
• Medium: The average FPS is 23, with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 26. The performance is consistently poor.
• High: The average FPS is 18. This is a very low frame rate.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 14. This is the lowest recorded performance in the entire dataset.

The data across all resolutions confirms a clear pattern: the Intel Arc B370 is the limiting factor. The system performs acceptably only at the lowest resolution and settings. The FPS drop is steep and consistent as resolution increases, making this combo unsuitable for 1440p or 4K gaming in Fivem. The CPU, while not a high-end part, is sufficient for this workload, as evidenced by the GPU-bound performance scaling.