Fivem

Fivem is a unique multiplayer stress test because its performance profile is heavily influenced by server-side simulation and CPU-bound tasks, rather than being a purely GPU-driven showcase. The measured data for the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination reveals a system with massive headroom at lower resolutions, but one where the scaling to 4K exposes the expected shift in bottleneck. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark rows to interpret how this specific CPU-GPU pairing behaves across the tested settings and resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K shows the classic signature of a system transitioning from CPU-bound to GPU-bound territory. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 333 FPS, which is an extraordinary figure that only makes sense if the CPU is doing the heavy lifting while the RTX 4080 SUPER idles with plenty of spare capacity. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 218.5 FPS, a reduction of roughly 34%, which is a substantial hit but still leaves the system in high-refresh-rate territory. The 4K Low result of 121.7 FPS continues this trend, showing that even at the highest resolution with minimal graphical load, the system remains extremely fast.

The picture changes dramatically when we look at the Ultra preset. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 159.1 FPS, which is less than half of the 1080p Low score. This indicates that the graphical settings are now loading the GPU significantly, but the CPU is still able to feed it adequately. At 1440p Ultra, the score falls to 106 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it bottoms out at 59.2 FPS. The delta between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings is a drop of 62.8%, which is far more severe than the 63.5% drop seen between 1080p and 4K at Low settings (333 to 121.7). This data suggests that the limiting component shifts decisively to the GPU as both resolution and settings increase.

The scaling pattern across the Medium and High presets reinforces this interpretation. At 1080p Medium, the system hits 259.4 FPS, while at 4K Medium, it drops to 96.5 FPS, a reduction of 62.8%. The High preset shows a similar relative decline, from 205.8 FPS at 1080p to 73.3 FPS at 4K, a 64.4% drop. The fact that the percentage drop is so consistent across these three presets (Low, Medium, High) suggests that the GPU is becoming the primary constraint at 4K regardless of the specific settings, while the CPU maintains a strong enough lead to avoid becoming the sole bottleneck at lower resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 59.2 FPS is the only sub-60 figure in the entire dataset, indicating that this pairing is best suited for high-refresh gameplay at 1440p or lower, with 4K reserved for less demanding visual presets.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 333, recorded at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the absolute ceiling for this pairing in the tested configurations.

Q: How does the CPU's 12-core/24-thread configuration impact the 1080p performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, clearly provides enough processing power to drive frame rates above 300 at 1080p Low. The substantial gap between 1080p Low (333 FPS) and 4K Low (121.7 FPS) indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor at the lower resolution, as the GPU is able to render frames much faster than it can at higher pixel counts.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER capable of running Fivem at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only with adjusted settings. The data shows 4K High produces 73.3 FPS, and 4K Medium achieves 96.5 FPS. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 59.2 FPS, which is just above the typical 60 FPS target but leaves little headroom for demanding multiplayer moments.

Q: How does the performance gap between 1080p and 4K vary with the graphics preset?

A: The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is remarkably consistent across presets. At Low, the drop is 63.5% (333 to 121.7 FPS). At Medium, it is 62.8% (259.4 to 96.5 FPS). At High, it is 64.4% (205.8 to 73.3 FPS). This consistent scaling points to the GPU becoming the dominant bottleneck at 4K in all scenarios.

Q: What is the average frame rate difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset yields 218.5 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields 106 FPS. This represents a 51.5% reduction in average frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest graphical fidelity.

Q: How does the 1080p High result compare to the 1440p Ultra result?

A: The 1080p High score is 205.8 FPS, while the 1440p Ultra score is 106 FPS. This shows that the system can double its output by dropping to a lower resolution and a slightly less demanding preset, making 1440p Ultra a viable target for high-refresh monitors.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 64 MB shared L3 cache. In the context of Fivem, which is known for being sensitive to single-threaded performance due to its game engine and server communication, these specifications are crucial. The CPU's benchmark scores support its strength: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6555 and a multi-core score of 46438. The single-core strength is particularly relevant for Fivem, as the game's simulation logic often relies on a few primary threads.

The data shows that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in most tested scenarios. At 1080p Low, the system produces 333 FPS, which is a figure that would be impossible if the CPU were struggling to keep up with the GPU. The fact that the 1080p Ultra score (159.1 FPS) is still more than double the 4K Ultra score (59.2 FPS) confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. However, the CPU's role becomes more apparent when comparing the 1080p results across presets. The jump from 1080p Low (333 FPS) to 1080p Medium (259.4 FPS) is a 22.1% reduction, which is directly attributable to the increased graphical load on the GPU, not a CPU limitation.

The Ryzen 9 9900X's performance relative to its nearest rivals shows it is a very competitive part. It sits at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54450. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, has an average score of 54681, which is only 0.4% higher. The Intel Core i7-14700F is just 0.7% behind, with a score of 54097. This indicates that the 9900X is positioned at the top tier of desktop processors, providing ample headroom for Fivem's CPU demands, even in crowded multiplayer scenarios where the game's efficiency can degrade.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination is ranked 111th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 6.2% of all configurations. This is a strong showing, but it is important to note that the ranking is specific to this game and the measured settings. The combo's high rank is likely driven by the exceptional 1080p performance, where the CPU's power allows the GPU to stretch its legs. The fact that the rank is not higher, despite the raw power of both components, suggests that Fivem's performance ceiling is constrained by factors other than pure hardware capability, such as server tick rate or engine limitations.

The GPU itself is ranked at the 88th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53610. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, is only 0.2% ahead, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is 2.9% behind. This places the RTX 4080 SUPER in the upper echelon of graphics cards. However, the CPU's 94th percentile ranking is even higher, suggesting that the processor is a slightly stronger component in this pairing. This is reflected in the game's results, where the CPU's performance at 1080p allows for frame rates that exceed what a less capable processor could achieve.

The combo's rank of 111 out of 1792 indicates that there are 110 other configurations that achieve better overall performance in Fivem. This could be due to combinations of higher-end CPUs (like the 9900X3D or Intel's top-tier parts) or GPUs that are better optimized for the game's specific rendering path. However, given that the RTX 4080 SUPER is end-of-life and the CPU is a recent release, this ranking represents a very high level of performance for a current-generation pairing. The data confirms that this is a top-tier setup for Fivem, capable of delivering high frame rates at 1440p and respectable performance at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For players with a 1080p 240Hz or 360Hz monitor, the Low preset (333 FPS) is the only option that fully saturates such a display, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 259.4 FPS is a better balance, still providing frame rates well above 240 FPS while offering improved graphical quality. The High preset at 205.8 FPS is also excellent for 240Hz displays, and it provides a more visually rich experience than Medium. The Ultra preset at 159.1 FPS is still smooth, but it is best suited for 144Hz monitors at this resolution.

At 1440p, the situation is more nuanced. The Low preset yields 218.5 FPS, which is ideal for 240Hz panels but looks sparse. The Medium preset at 173.3 FPS is a strong contender for 165Hz or 180Hz displays, offering a good mix of visual quality and performance. The High preset at 133.6 FPS is perfect for 144Hz monitors, providing a visually detailed experience without dropping below the refresh rate. The Ultra preset at 106 FPS is playable on 120Hz displays, but it requires a tolerance for slightly lower frame pacing. For most users, the High preset at 1440p appears to be the sweet spot, as it delivers a 133.6 FPS average that comfortably supports high-refresh gaming while maintaining a high level of graphical fidelity.

For 4K gaming, the data suggests that the Ultra preset is not recommended, as the 59.2 FPS average is too close to the 60 FPS threshold for comfort, particularly in a multiplayer game where frame drops can occur. The High preset at 73.3 FPS is the better choice for a 60Hz display, as it provides a more stable margin above the target. The Medium preset at 96.5 FPS is the strongest recommendation for 4K, as it offers a significant performance boost over High while still looking considerably better than Low (121.7 FPS). Given that the game is multiplayer and frame consistency is important, the Medium preset at 4K provides the best balance of visual fidelity and performance headroom, ensuring that the system does not dip below 60 FPS in demanding scenarios.