Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT delivers a broad performance envelope in Fivem, with measured averages ranging from a demanding 42.1 FPS at 4K Ultra to a fluid 234.2 FPS at 1080p Low. This data reveals a system whose bottleneck shifts dramatically depending on the resolution and visual load, offering a clear picture of how the CPU and GPU interact under different conditions. The combination’s rank of 677 out of 1792 tested combos places it in the upper tier of configurations, though the specific frame rates suggest that the experience is highly contingent on the user’s display and settings priorities.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a predictable yet steep decline as resolution increases, but the rate of that decline is heavily influenced by the graphics preset. At the Low preset, the drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial, moving from 234.2 FPS down to 83.7 FPS, a reduction of roughly 64%. This sharp falloff indicates that even at Low settings, the GPU is being pushed significantly harder at higher resolutions, moving from a state where the CPU can feed frames quickly to one where the renderer becomes the primary constraint.

Moving to the High preset, the scaling story changes. The average frame rate at 1080p is 146.3 FPS, which drops to 96.2 FPS at 1440p and then to 52.8 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K here is about 64%, similar to Low, but the absolute values are much lower. This suggests that the High preset introduces a heavier GPU workload that caps the maximum frame rate even at 1080p, making the GPU the limiting component across all resolutions tested. The gap between 1440p and 4K is particularly large, with a 43.4 FPS difference, indicating that 4K demands a level of shading and fill rate that the RX 7800 XT struggles to maintain while keeping the High preset’s visual features active.

The Ultra preset shows the most severe scaling, with a 1080p average of 114 FPS falling to 76.1 FPS at 1440p and a meager 42.1 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 63%, but the curve is steeper between 1440p and 4K, where the FPS falls by 34 frames. This pattern strongly implies that at Ultra settings, the GPU’s resources are exhausted quickly as pixel count rises, and the CPU’s potential to deliver high frame rates is masked by the renderer’s inability to keep pace. The data indicates that for this combo, 1080p is the only resolution where the CPU can demonstrate its full strength, while at 4K, the GPU’s raw throughput is the sole determinant of performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average is 234.2 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to the 1080p Low performance?

A: The 4K Ultra average of 42.1 FPS is significantly lower than the 1080p Low average of 234.2 FPS, representing a performance drop of 192.1 FPS, or roughly 82% less throughput.

Q: At which resolution does the system exceed 100 FPS on the High preset?

A: The data shows that the system exceeds 100 FPS on High only at 1920x1080, where it averages 146.3 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset average falls to 96.2 FPS, below the 100 FPS mark.

Q: Is the performance difference between the Medium and High presets consistent across resolutions?

A: No. At 1080p, the difference is 37.2 FPS (183.5 vs 146.3), but at 1440p it narrows to 25.5 FPS (121.7 vs 96.2), and at 4K it shrinks further to 14.1 FPS (66.9 vs 52.8). The gap closes as resolution increases.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 677th out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the upper 62nd percentile of all configurations tested in Fivem.

Q: Does the GPU’s benchmark percentile align with its in-game performance?

A: The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 76, while the CPU’s is 93. The in-game rank suggests the combo performs well, but the high CPU percentile indicates that the CPU may be underutilized at higher resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows suggest that the Low preset is the only one that fully unlocks the system’s potential, but it comes with the caveat of minimal visual fidelity. For users prioritizing sheer frame rate at 1080p, the Low preset’s 234.2 FPS average is the standout figure, offering a competitive advantage in a multiplayer environment like Fivem. However, the jump to Medium provides a substantial improvement in visual quality for a more modest cost, delivering 183.5 FPS at 1080p, which is still exceptionally smooth and a 50.7 FPS reduction from Low.

For those with 1440p displays, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot, as it produces a 121.7 FPS average that remains comfortably above the 100 FPS threshold for high refresh-rate monitors. The High preset at 1440p dips to 96.2 FPS, which is playable but may not fully saturate a 144Hz panel, while the Ultra preset’s 76.1 FPS average is the first to fall below the 80 FPS mark, indicating a clear trade-off in smoothness for maximum detail. At 4K, no preset achieves a 60 FPS average; the Low preset comes closest with 83.7 FPS, making it the only viable option for a playable experience, while Medium (66.9 FPS) is borderline and High (52.8 FPS) and Ultra (42.1 FPS) are likely too sluggish for fast-paced multiplayer action.

The data implies that the best experience is a compromise between the Medium and High presets at 1080p or 1440p, depending on the display. The Medium preset at 1440p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, while the High preset at 1080p is a strong alternative for those who want higher fidelity without sacrificing the 144 FPS target. The Ultra preset is only recommended for users who prioritize image quality above all else and are willing to accept frame rates below 80 FPS at any resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system shows its full range. The Low preset averages 234.2 FPS, the highest score in the dataset. Medium follows with 183.5 FPS, High with 146.3 FPS, and Ultra at 114 FPS. The progression shows a nearly linear decrease of roughly 30-40 FPS with each step up in settings, indicating that the CPU and GPU are both capable of handling the load at this resolution, with the preset dictating the final frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 151.8 FPS (Low), 121.7 FPS (Medium), 96.2 FPS (High), and 76.1 FPS (Ultra). The differences between presets are more compressed than at 1080p, with a 30.1 FPS gap between Low and Medium, and a 25.5 FPS gap between Medium and High. The Ultra preset trails High by 20.1 FPS. This compression suggests that the GPU is starting to become a limiting factor, as the raw pixel count increases the workload for each setting.

At 3840x2160, the performance is heavily constrained. Low averages 83.7 FPS, Medium 66.9 FPS, High 52.8 FPS, and Ultra 42.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 16.8 FPS, and between Medium and High it is 14.1 FPS, showing a continued but smaller incremental cost for each preset. The difference between High and Ultra is 10.7 FPS. The data shows that even the Low preset at 4K is slower than the Ultra preset at 1080p, highlighting the massive pixel throughput required at this resolution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, provides a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, which is critical for high-resolution textures. The memory clock is listed at 2438 MHz, with an effective speed of 19.5 Gbps. The GPU’s boost clock reaches 2430 MHz, with a game clock of 2124 MHz, and its FP32 performance is rated at 37.32 TFLOPS. These specifications suggest a capable mid-to-high-range card, but the measured FPS data shows that its limits are reached at 4K with higher presets.

The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 76, indicating it outperforms 76% of all tested GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 32619, and its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro S9300 X2, scores 32540, a delta of 0.2%. In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes dominant as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the GPU is not the bottleneck, as the high FPS indicates the CPU is feeding frames quickly. However, at 4K Ultra, the GPU’s render throughput is clearly the limiting factor, as the frame rate drops to 42.1 FPS.

The VRAM capacity of 16 GB is ample for this game, as no memory-related stutters are evident in the average FPS data. The clock speeds are moderate, but the card’s architecture, with 3840 shading units and 96 ROPs, determines its fill rate. The pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s are the key metrics that govern performance at higher resolutions. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is a solid performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K data shows a clear performance cliff, particularly at High and Ultra presets, where the card cannot maintain a smooth 60 FPS average.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its 64 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial, and its 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and max-thread score of 12536 indicate strong multi-threaded capabilities. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus is 93, and its average benchmark score is 50556, placing it just 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, which scores 50598.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is most apparent at lower resolutions and settings. The 1080p Low average of 234.2 FPS is a clear indicator that the CPU is capable of delivering very high frame rates when the GPU is not heavily taxed. The single-thread performance, as shown by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6168, is likely a key factor in this game’s performance, as multiplayer titles often rely on strong single-core performance for game logic and physics.

However, the CPU’s high core count and thread count (12 cores, 24 threads) may be underutilized in Fivem, as the game may not scale perfectly across all cores. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the frame rate is 42.1 FPS, which is far below the CPU’s potential, indicating that the GPU is the limiting component in that scenario. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.60 GHz helps maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but its 170 W TDP and 5 nm process suggest it is a high-power part. The benchmark results confirm that the 7900X is a top-tier CPU, but its performance in Fivem is only fully realized at 1080p, where it can push the GPU to its limits.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo holds a rank of 677 out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the top 38% of all configurations. This is a solid position, but the specific FPS data reveals that the ranking is not uniform across all resolutions. The CPU’s high percentile (93) and the GPU’s lower percentile (76) suggest that the system is balanced towards CPU-heavy workloads, which is advantageous for games like Fivem that may have significant simulation overhead.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is highly competitive, with a delta of only -0.1% against the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, and -0.4% against the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT. The GPU’s rivals show a similar pattern, with a 0.2% delta against the AMD FirePro S9300 X2 and a -0.4% delta against the NVIDIA P104-100. This indicates that the combo is well-matched, with neither component being a major outlier in its respective benchmark class.

The rank of 677 suggests that there are 676 combos that perform better on average, but the data shows that this combo’s performance is highly dependent on the settings and resolution used. At 1080p Low, the system is likely to rank much higher due to the exceptional 234.2 FPS average, while at 4K Ultra, the 42.1 FPS average would place it lower in the rankings. The combo’s overall rank is thus an average of its performance across all tested conditions, and the measured FPS data indicates that it is a versatile system that can excel in competitive 1080p play but is less suited for high-fidelity 4K gaming. The data suggests that users with this combo should target 1440p with Medium or High settings to achieve a balance between the CPU’s potential and the GPU’s rendering limits, ensuring a rank-appropriate experience.