Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the comboRankInGame for the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Fivem?

A: This combination ranks 569th out of 1,792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top third of all configurations evaluated.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D scores 37,780 on average, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon 6353P (37,811) and Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (37,831), 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-13900HK (38,020), and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-13600KF (38,028).

Q: What are the GPU's memory specifications?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock operates at 2518 MHz, which translates to 20.1 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the best average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 247.5, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is more than double the 4K Ultra performance of 41 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread score?

A: The CPU scores 1,212 in 3DMark single-thread and 10,081 in 3DMark 16-thread tests, showing strong scaling. Its PassMark single-thread score is 4,430 versus 40,009 for multithread.

Q: What architectural details define the CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The CPU is built on Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) architecture using a 4 nm process with 8,315 million transistors, while the GPU uses RDNA 4.0 (Navi 48) also on 4 nm with 53,900 million transistors.

# GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 plays a pivotal role in this Fivem configuration, operating with a base clock of 1330 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The game clock sits at 2070 MHz, which represents the expected sustained frequency during typical gaming workloads. With 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units, the GPU has substantial raw throughput capabilities. The 56 ray tracing cores add hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though their impact in Fivem depends on the game's specific implementation.

Memory bandwidth proves critical for texture streaming in a multiplayer environment. The 16 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth ensures that large texture sets and high-resolution assets can be loaded without creating a bottleneck. The 256-bit memory bus width provides a generous data path, while the effective 20.1 Gbps memory speed keeps pixel and texture rates high. The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s, providing the fill rate necessary for high-detail scenes.

The compute capabilities are substantial, with FP32 performance rated at 36.13 TFLOPS and FP16 at 72.25 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. These figures suggest the GPU can handle modern rendering techniques and any compute-based post-processing effects that Fivem might employ. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current graphics standards.

In the context of Fivem's results, the GPU's role becomes clearer when examining frame rates across settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 247.5 FPS, indicating that the GPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 and PassMark G3D score of 25,381 place the GPU in the 79th percentile of all GPUs, confirming its position as a high-performance part.

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution-dependent performance scaling. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo delivers 247.5 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops performance to 163.4 FPS, representing a 34% reduction. At 3840x2160 Low, the frame rate falls to 88.1 FPS, which is a further 46% decrease from 1440p.

The Ultra settings tell a similar but more pronounced story. At 1080p Ultra, the system produces 122.2 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, this drops to 81.9 FPS, a 33% decline. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate falls to 41 FPS, which is exactly half of the 1440p Ultra figure. This consistent scaling pattern across settings indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck as resolution increases.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (247.5 FPS) and Ultra (122.2 FPS) is 125.3 FPS. At 4K, the difference between Low (88.1 FPS) and Ultra (41 FPS) is 47.1 FPS. This compression of the settings delta at higher resolutions suggests that pixel throughput demands are saturating the GPU, leaving less headroom for additional graphical features.

The data indicates that 1440p represents a balanced operating point. At High settings, the combo achieves 101.3 FPS at 1440p versus 153.4 FPS at 1080p, a 34% reduction. The 4K High result of 56.6 FPS shows a 44% drop from 1440p High. These scaling ratios are consistent with GPU-bound behavior, where the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU at all resolutions.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080: The lowest resolution tested shows the highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce 247.5 FPS average, while Medium yields 196.8 FPS. High settings deliver 153.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 122.2 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 50.6% reduction in frame rate, indicating that each settings tier imposes meaningful additional GPU workload.

2560x1440: At this resolution, Low settings achieve 163.4 FPS, which remains highly playable for competitive scenarios. Medium settings produce 128 FPS, while High delivers 101.3 FPS. Ultra settings yield 81.9 FPS, maintaining smooth gameplay for most display refresh rates. The delta between Low and Ultra is 81.5 FPS, representing a 49.9% reduction from the Low baseline.

3840x2160: The 4K results show the most constrained performance envelope. Low settings manage 88.1 FPS, while Medium produces 69.4 FPS. High settings drop to 56.6 FPS, and Ultra falls to 41 FPS. This range of 47.1 FPS between Low and Ultra is the narrowest of any resolution, confirming that 4K places sustained pressure on the GPU regardless of quality settings.

The data reveals that Medium settings at 1440p (128 FPS) outperform Ultra at 1080p (122.2 FPS) by 4.7%. Similarly, High at 1440p (101.3 FPS) exceeds 4K Low (88.1 FPS) by 15%. These cross-resolution comparisons suggest that users prioritizing frame rate should consider reducing resolution before lowering quality settings, as the resolution penalty is more severe than the settings penalty in most cases.

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination ranks 569th out of 1,792 tested combos in Fivem, positioning it within the top 31.7% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the strong CPU performance combined with the capable GPU, though it also indicates that many other combinations achieve higher frame rates in this specific game.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 90th among all CPUs suggests that the processor is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. Its average benchmark score of 37,780 places it in close competition with several Intel parts. The Intel Xeon 6353P scores 37,811 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 37,831 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i9-13900HK scores 38,020 (0.6% ahead), and the Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38,028 (0.7% ahead). These margins are minimal, indicating that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D provides competitive CPU performance for Fivem.

The GPU's 79th percentile ranking among all GPUs reveals that the Radeon RX 9070 is a strong but not top-tier graphics solution. Its average benchmark score of 34,780 sits close to several competitors: the NVIDIA A2 scores 34,866 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 scores 34,677 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon HD 7970 scores 34,541 (0.7% behind), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 34,511 (0.8% behind). These small deltas suggest the RX 9070 is well-positioned within its performance class.

The combination's rank of 569 out of 1,792 indicates that while this pairing delivers solid Fivem performance, there are 568 combinations that achieve better results. Given that the CPU ranks in the 90th percentile and the GPU in the 79th, the overall combo rank suggests that Fivem's performance characteristics may favor different GPU architectures or configurations. The measured FPS data confirms this is a capable setup, particularly at 1080p where it exceeds 120 FPS even at Ultra settings, but the rank shows room for optimization within the broader context of tested systems.