Fivem

Fivem is a multiplayer modification platform that stresses both CPU and GPU depending on the game world and player count. The measured data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER shows a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions, with clear bottlenecks emerging at each setting tier. The combo ranks 200th out of 1792 tested combinations, placing it in the top 11% of all hardware pairings for this game, with an average benchmark score of 48704 for the GPU and 26214 for the CPU.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep but consistent with the GPU’s capabilities. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 299 FPS at 1920x1080 to 200.9 FPS at 2560x1440, then to 113.3 FPS at 3840x2160. That represents a 33% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 44% drop from 1440p to 4K. This pattern indicates that even at Low settings, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU has enough headroom to push well beyond 200 FPS at 1440p.

At High settings, the scaling is more moderate: 193.4 FPS at 1080p, 128.9 FPS at 1440p, and 71.1 FPS at 4K. The 4K figure is 63% lower than the 1080p result, showing that the GPU’s rendering load increases faster than the resolution multiplier suggests. The data reveals that at Ultra settings, the 4K average of 54.8 FPS is only 36% of the 1080p Ultra score of 151.4 FPS. This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that disproportionately tax the GPU at higher pixel counts.

The gap between Low and Medium settings narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Medium is 58.3 FPS (299 vs 240.7), but at 4K it shrinks to 24 FPS (113.3 vs 89.3). This compression indicates that the GPU becomes the dominant constraint at 4K, making the CPU’s role less significant. Conversely, at 1080p, the huge delta between Low and Ultra (147.6 FPS) suggests the CPU can still feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU’s fill rate and shading power become the ceiling.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average is 299 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data that approaches the 300 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26214 on average, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (26272) and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26196). The differences are negligible, indicating near-identical multi-threaded performance.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER more powerful than the NVIDIA CMP 50HX?

A: No, the CMP 50HX has an average score of 49071, which is 0.7% higher than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 48704. The GPU ranks in the 86th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the lowest playable average FPS in the measured data?

A: The lowest average is 54.8 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is the only result below 60 FPS across all tested combinations.

Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K at Medium settings?

A: At Medium settings, 1920x1080 delivers 240.7 FPS, while 3840x2160 delivers 89.3 FPS. The 1080p result is 2.7 times higher.

Q: Does the GPU’s memory bandwidth affect performance in this game?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit bus. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 54.8, suggesting that memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the dominant component in this configuration, with its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 256-bit bus providing 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock of 2340 MHz and boost clock of 2610 MHz are relatively high for the Ada Lovelace architecture, and the chip contains 8448 shading units alongside 264 texture mapping units and 96 raster output pipelines. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s, which are directly relevant to Fivem’s rendering workload.

The benchmark data shows the GPU’s percentile rank at 86, with an average score of 48704. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A550M, scores 49737, putting the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 2.1% behind. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.6% (47915) and the RTX A1000 Mobile by 2% (47743). In Fivem specifically, the GPU’s role becomes evident when comparing settings at the same resolution. At 4K, moving from Low (113.3 FPS) to Medium (89.3 FPS) costs 24 FPS, while moving from Medium to High (71.1 FPS) costs another 18.2 FPS. The jump to Ultra (54.8 FPS) costs an additional 16.3 FPS.

The 16 GB VRAM capacity is substantial for a multiplayer game with custom assets, and the GDDR6X memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) provides ample headroom. The data shows that at 1080p, the GPU is not the limiting factor at Low settings (299 FPS), but at 4K Ultra, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the CPU’s multi-threaded score of 22620 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle the game logic without holding back the GPU.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the Medium preset offers the best balance between visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium yields 240.7 FPS, which is 39% higher than High (193.4 FPS) and 59% higher than Ultra (151.4 FPS). The gap between Medium and High at 1440p is 29.4 FPS (158.3 vs 128.9), while at 4K the gap narrows to 18.2 FPS (89.3 vs 71.1). This consistency makes Medium the safest choice for maintaining high frame rates without sacrificing too much graphical fidelity.

For users targeting 4K, the High preset provides 71.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Ultra at 4K drops to 54.8 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced scenarios but is below ideal refresh rates. The Low preset at 4K (113.3 FPS) is viable for competitive play, but the visual downgrade is significant. At 1440p, High delivers 128.9 FPS, making it the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors, while Ultra (97.3 FPS) is still playable but leaves little headroom.

The data suggests that the Ultra preset is not worth the performance cost on this hardware. At 1080p, Ultra (151.4 FPS) is 37% slower than High (193.4 FPS), and at 4K, Ultra (54.8 FPS) is 23% slower than High (71.1 FPS). The Medium preset at 1440p (158.3 FPS) outperforms High at 4K (71.1 FPS) by a factor of 2.2, indicating that resolution scaling matters more than settings for this GPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 299 FPS on Low, 240.7 FPS on Medium, 193.4 FPS on High, and 151.4 FPS on Ultra. The delta between Low and Ultra is 147.6 FPS, showing that settings have a massive impact at this resolution. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, running at 3.40 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost, are sufficient to keep the GPU fed, as evidenced by the 299 FPS Low result.

At 2560x1440, the results are 200.9 FPS on Low, 158.3 FPS on Medium, 128.9 FPS on High, and 97.3 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p Low result is 33% lower than 1080p Low, indicating that the GPU is starting to become the limiting factor. The Ultra preset at 1440p (97.3 FPS) is still above 60 FPS, but the Medium preset (158.3 FPS) offers a 63% improvement over Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 113.3 FPS on Low, 89.3 FPS on Medium, 71.1 FPS on High, and 54.8 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show the GPU is heavily taxed, with the Low preset barely exceeding 100 FPS. The transition from 1440p to 4K at High settings reduces the average from 128.9 to 71.1 FPS, a 45% drop. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only measured configuration below 60 FPS, and it falls 8.7% short of that threshold.

The data also shows that the scaling from Medium to High at 4K (89.3 to 71.1 FPS) is a 20% reduction, while the scaling from High to Ultra (71.1 to 54.8 FPS) is a 23% reduction. This consistency suggests that each settings tier imposes a similar incremental load on the GPU at 4K.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a Zen 3 part built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz are modest by current standards, but the CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support (51.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide adequate data throughput. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26214, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22620 and a single-core score of 3193.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p, where the GPU is less taxed. At Low settings, the CPU delivers 299 FPS, which is 2.6 times higher than the 4K Low result of 113.3 FPS. This indicates that at 1080p, the CPU can push frame rates well beyond what the GPU can render at higher resolutions. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, scores 26272, which is only 0.2% higher, showing that the 5700X is not a bottleneck in synthetic tests.

The CPU’s 3DMark scores provide insight into its threading behavior: 6858 for 16 threads, 5768 for 8 threads, and 921 for single-thread. The ratio between 8-thread and 16-thread scores (5768 vs 6858) suggests that Fivem’s workload benefits from additional cores but with diminishing returns. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26612 and single-thread score of 3385 align with the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking, indicating it is a mid-to-high-end part that can handle multiplayer game logic without becoming the primary constraint, except possibly in heavily populated servers.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die make it an efficient choice, and its PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes ensures the GPU has sufficient bandwidth. The data shows that at 1440p and 4K, the CPU is not the limiting factor, as the GPU’s frame rate drops are consistent with its rendering load. However, at 1080p Low, the 299 FPS result suggests the CPU can sustain very high frame rates, making it a capable partner for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in less demanding scenarios.