Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a wide spread of framerates in Fivem, with the data showing that the choice of graphics preset is the single most decisive factor in the experience. The measured rows indicate that the "Low" preset is the only setting that consistently pushes average frame rates past the 100 FPS threshold across all resolutions, making it the most reliable choice for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. At 1080p, the Low preset yields an average of 175 FPS, a figure that dwarfs the 86 FPS average of the Ultra preset at the same resolution. The gap narrows as resolution increases, but the pattern remains: Low is the performance king, while Medium offers a balanced middle ground with an average of 138 FPS at 1080p. High is a playable compromise, but the data suggests that users prioritizing smoothness over visual fidelity should default to Low, while those with variable refresh rate displays might find Medium acceptable for its 77 FPS minimum at 1440p.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data for Fivem presents a clear hierarchy of performance across the four tested presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 175 FPS, which is the highest recorded score in the entire dataset. This is a significant leap over the Medium preset's 138 FPS average, which itself is a substantial improvement over the High preset's 111 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p falls to an 86 FPS average, demonstrating a steep cost for maximum visual quality. For users with 1440p monitors, the Low preset remains the superior choice, achieving a 115 FPS average, while Medium drops to 91 FPS and High to 73 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p manages only a 56 FPS average, which may be below the comfort zone for many players. At 4K resolution, the story is more constrained: Low produces a 64 FPS average, Medium 50 FPS, High 40 FPS, and Ultra just 31 FPS. The data suggests that the Low preset is the only option that consistently provides a playable experience across all resolutions, and it is the recommended setting for users who prioritize frame rate stability. Medium is a viable alternative for those with less demanding expectations, as its minimum FPS values (117 at 1080p, 77 at 1440p, 43 at 4K) indicate it can hold a reasonable floor, but the jumps in average FPS from Low to Medium are considerable. High is a middle-ground option that sacrifices a notable portion of performance for incremental visual gains, and Ultra is best reserved for hardware that can tolerate sub-60 FPS averages in this multiplayer title.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the driving force behind Fivem's rendering, and its specifications in the FACT PACK reveal why the measured frame rates behave as they do. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, which is a critical resource for a game that often loads large open-world assets in a multiplayer context. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective, and this configuration appears sufficient for the game's demands at most settings, though the Ultra preset's 31 FPS average at 4K suggests that the 8 GB capacity may be a limiting factor at the highest resolutions and quality levels. The GPU's base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, and these clock speeds allow the card to push a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s. The 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs provide the raw compute power for the game's lighting and effects, but the data shows that the GPU's performance ceiling is reached when both resolution and settings are pushed to their extremes. The RX 9060's benchmark scores place it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16129 with a deltaPct of -0.7, indicating the two cards are effectively neck-and-neck. This parity suggests that the RX 9060's performance in Fivem is representative of its general class, and the measured FPS drops at higher settings are consistent with a mid-range GPU being taxed by a demanding multiplayer environment.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data across the three resolutions provides a clear picture of how the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combo scales with pixel count. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS for the Low preset drops from 175 to 115, a reduction of 60 FPS, or approximately 34%. At the High preset, the drop is from 111 to 73 FPS, a 38 FPS reduction, and at Medium it falls from 138 to 91 FPS, a 47 FPS reduction. The Ultra preset sees a drop from 86 to 56 FPS, a 30 FPS reduction. When scaling further from 1440p to 4K (3840x2160), the Low preset falls from 115 to 64 FPS, a 51 FPS drop, while High drops from 73 to 40 FPS, and Medium from 91 to 50 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K reaches only 31 FPS, down from 56 at 1440p. These scaling patterns indicate that the system is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, as the frame rate degradation is roughly proportional to the increase in pixel count. At 1080p, the high FPS figures suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU adequately, but at 4K, the GPU's 8 GB memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth become bottlenecks, as evidenced by the 40 FPS average at High and 31 FPS at Ultra. The data implies that for a 4K experience, the Low preset is the only viable option, and even then, the 64 FPS average may not be smooth enough for all users. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a total average FPS loss of 111 FPS on the Low preset (from 175 to 64), which is a 63% reduction, confirming that resolution is the dominant factor in performance variance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides exact average FPS figures for each resolution and settings combination, with some entries also including minimum and maximum values. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 175 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire table. The Medium preset at this resolution averages 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS, indicating a stable frame time distribution. The High preset averages 111 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 86 FPS, with no min/max data recorded for those entries. At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers an average of 115 FPS, while Medium averages 91 FPS, with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS. High averages 73 FPS, and Ultra averages 56 FPS. The 4K resolution results show the most strain: Low averages 64 FPS, Medium averages 50 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS, High averages 40 FPS, and Ultra averages 31 FPS. These numbers reveal a consistent pattern where the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 89 FPS (175 vs 86), at 1440p it is 59 FPS (115 vs 56), and at 4K it is 33 FPS (64 vs 31). This narrowing gap suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the settings have less relative impact on the final frame rate. The Medium preset's min/max values are the only ones recorded, and they show a consistent ~30 FPS range between min and max across all resolutions, indicating that the game's frame pacing remains relatively consistent in this preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS is 175, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the Ultra preset at 4K compare to the Low preset at 1080p?

A: The Ultra preset at 4K averages 31 FPS, which is 144 FPS lower than the Low preset at 1080p's 175 FPS average. This represents an 82% reduction in performance.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 has a minimum FPS of 77, with an average of 91 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS.

Q: Which settings preset provides the most consistent frame pacing based on the available min/max data?

A: The Medium preset is the only one with min/max data, and it shows a consistent range of approximately 30 FPS between minimum and maximum values across all three resolutions (42 FPS at 1080p, 28 FPS at 1440p, and 15 FPS at 4K).

Q: How many FPS does the combo lose when moving from 1080p Low to 4K Low?

A: The average FPS drops from 175 at 1080p Low to 64 at 4K Low, a reduction of 111 FPS, which is a 63% decrease.

Q: Is the RX 9060's performance in Fivem consistent with its general benchmark standing?

A: The RX 9060 ranks in the 59th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 16014, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16129 with a deltaPct of -0.7, indicating near-parity. The Fivem results show the GPU scaling logically with resolution and settings, consistent with a mid-range card.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X provides the processing backbone for this combo, and its specifications help explain the high frame rates observed at lower resolutions. The CPU features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, built on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process node. This configuration delivers strong single-threaded performance, as evidenced by its benchmark scores: a 3dmark single-thread score of 943, a cinebench r23 single-core score of 1574.5, and a geekbench single-core score of 2032. These figures are crucial for Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification that often relies on the main thread for game logic and network handling. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are also robust, with a 3dmark max threads score of 7578, a cinebench r23 multicore score of 15476, and a geekbench multicore score of 11036. In the context of Fivem, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at 1080p resolution, where the GPU is less stressed and the frame rates are high. The 175 FPS average at 1080p Low suggests that the CPU can handle the game's simulation and rendering instructions without becoming a bottleneck, as the GPU is not yet saturated. However, at 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes, and the GPU's limitations take over, as seen in the 64 FPS average at Low settings. The CPU's percentile ranking of 81 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29123, places it in a strong position, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H, scores 29093 with a deltaPct of 0.1, indicating the 5800X is marginally ahead. This performance headroom means that in Fivem, the CPU is unlikely to be the primary constraint, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU's 8 GB memory and bandwidth are more critical.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination holds a rank of 1714 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 57th percentile of all configurations. This mid-tier ranking is consistent with the individual component standings, as the CPU ranks in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. The combo's performance in Fivem is therefore more limited by the GPU than the CPU, as the data shows that the frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings. In the context of the combo's overall ranking, the 1714th position out of 3005 suggests that there are many configurations that achieve higher frame rates, likely those with more powerful GPUs. However, the combo's strength lies in its balance: the CPU's strong single-threaded performance supports high FPS at 1080p, while the GPU provides adequate performance for 1440p gaming at medium settings. The combo's rank is not an outlier, as it sits near the middle of the distribution, and the measured FPS data confirms that it is a capable, if not top-tier, pairing for Fivem. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-13500HX with a deltaPct of -0.5, show that the 5800X is competitive with newer mobile chips, while the GPU's nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 7700 with a deltaPct of 1, indicate that the RX 9060 is slightly outperformed by some similarly positioned cards. Overall, this combo's rank reflects a system that can handle Fivem at 1080p with high frame rates and at 1440p with acceptable performance, but it will struggle to maintain 4K at high settings, as the 31 FPS average at Ultra demonstrates.