Fivem

# Fivem Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers a compelling Fivem experience, with benchmark results showing this combination ranks 495th out of 3,707 tested combos, placing it in the top 13.4% of all configurations. The data reveals a system that excels at high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, while maintaining respectable 4K performance, though the scaling patterns between resolutions and settings tell a nuanced story about where the bottleneck truly lies.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data shows a dramatic drop as resolution increases, but the pattern is not uniform across all settings presets. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 290 at 1920x1080 to 203 at 2560x1440 — a 30% reduction — and then to 112 at 3840x2160, which represents another 45% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline when moving from 1440p to 4K suggests the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated at higher pixel counts, even with reduced graphical demands.

For High settings, the scaling is slightly less aggressive in percentage terms: 194 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 128 FPS at 1440p (34% decrease), and then to 71 FPS at 4K (45% decrease again). The consistency of that 45% drop from 1440p to 4K across both Low and High settings indicates a pixel-bound workload where the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's raw throughput is the primary constraint at 4K resolution.

Medium settings tell a similar story: 243 FPS at 1080p, 160 FPS at 1440p, and 89 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most severe scaling, with 151 FPS at 1080p, 99 FPS at 1440p, and just 55 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result represents only 36% of the 1080p Ultra performance, highlighting that this configuration struggles to maintain fluid frame rates at maximum settings on 4K displays.

The shape of these scaling curves — roughly linear with resolution rather than showing a sudden cliff — suggests neither component is completely overwhelmed at any single point. However, the fact that even at Low settings the 4K frame rate (112 FPS) is less than half of the 1080p figure (290 FPS) implies the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting across the entire resolution range, with the Ryzen 7 5700's 8 cores and 16 threads providing sufficient headroom to avoid becoming the primary limiter.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER brings substantial hardware to Fivem, with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This generous memory allocation means VRAM capacity is unlikely to be a limiting factor even at 4K Ultra settings, where the game's detailed environments and multiplayer player models can demand significant memory resources. The benchmark data supports this — the 4K Ultra result of 55 FPS appears constrained by compute throughput rather than memory capacity, as the drop from Medium to Ultra at 4K (89 to 55 FPS) is proportionally similar to the same setting change at 1080p (243 to 151 FPS).

The GPU's clock speeds — 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost — are relatively high for the Ada Lovelace architecture, and the 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability provides ample raw horsepower for Fivem's rendering workload. The 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores suggest the card is well-prepared for any ray-traced effects or DLSS features the game might support, though the measured data does not isolate these specific technologies.

The GPU's performance percentile of 76 among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31,087, places it in the upper tier of graphics cards. Its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (delta -0.4%), NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q (delta -0.4%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (delta -1.4%), and NVIDIA TITAN RTX (delta -1.9%) — all within 2% of its average score. This tight clustering suggests the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's real-world Fivem performance, which shows clear differentiation between settings presets, is more influenced by driver optimization and game-specific workloads than by raw benchmark scores alone.

The 285 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design indicate this is a power-hungry card, but the measured FPS numbers show it translating that power budget into consistently high frame rates across most resolution and settings combinations.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This configuration is well-suited to Fivem's multiplayer nature, which often involves numerous AI-driven NPCs, physics calculations for vehicles, and network synchronization tasks that can benefit from multiple threads. The 16 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide solid data throughput for game logic.

The CPU's synthetic benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,655 and single-core score of 2,916, while Geekbench reports 9,959 multicore and 1,907 single-core. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,628 and max-thread score of 6,617 indicate that scaling from 8 to 16 threads yields minimal additional performance, suggesting the processor's 8 physical cores are the primary compute units.

With a percentile rank of 78 among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 25,517, the Ryzen 7 5700 sits close to rivals like the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (delta -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (delta +0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (delta -0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (delta +0.3%). This tight grouping indicates the processor delivers consistent performance relative to its peers.

In Fivem, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU based on the resolution scaling data. The fact that frame rates scale almost linearly with pixel count — rather than showing a plateau at lower resolutions that would indicate CPU limitation — suggests the Ryzen 7 5700 is keeping pace with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's output. The 290 FPS at 1080p Low demonstrates the CPU can feed high frame rates, while the 55 FPS at 4K Ultra shows the GPU becoming the limiting factor at extreme pixel loads.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific pairing of AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves a rank of 495 out of 3,707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it solidly in the top 13.4% of all configurations analyzed. This ranking reflects the balanced nature of the pairing — neither component is dramatically mismatched for the game's demands, allowing the system to perform well across a range of resolutions and settings.

The rank position suggests that while there are 494 combinations that outperform this setup, there are 3,212 that fall behind. Given that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks at the 76th percentile among GPUs and the Ryzen 7 5700 at the 78th percentile among CPUs, the combined rank of 495 out of 3,707 aligns closely with what one might expect from two components both hovering near the 75-80 percentile mark. This consistency indicates the game is utilizing both components effectively without one severely bottlenecking the other.

The gap between this combo's rank and the top-performing configurations likely stems from more powerful GPUs (such as those with higher synthetic scores than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,087 average) or CPUs with superior single-threaded performance for Fivem's game logic. The data suggests that upgrading either component individually would yield diminishing returns without a corresponding boost to the other.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values span from 290 at Low settings to 151 at Ultra. Medium settings produce an average of 243 FPS with a minimum of 206 and maximum of 279, while High settings yield 194 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 48% reduction in frame rate (290 to 151 FPS), indicating that visual quality settings have a substantial impact even at 1080p resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance envelope tightens: Low produces 203 FPS, Medium averages 160 FPS (minimum 136, maximum 184), High achieves 128 FPS, and Ultra drops to 99 FPS. The percentage reduction from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 51%, slightly more severe than at 1080p, showing that the combination of higher resolution and increased settings compounds the GPU load.

At 3840x2160, the results become more modest: Low averages 112 FPS, Medium 89 FPS (minimum 75, maximum 102), High 71 FPS, and Ultra 55 FPS. The Low to Ultra reduction at 4K is 51% as well, maintaining a consistent pattern. The minimum FPS figures available only for Medium settings — 206 at 1080p, 136 at 1440p, and 75 at 4K — indicate that frame time consistency degrades with resolution, as the minimum values represent 85%, 85%, and 84% of their respective averages, showing stable frame pacing across all tested resolutions.

The complete dataset reveals that the largest single jump in performance comes from moving between High and Medium settings at any resolution: at 1080p, 194 to 243 FPS (25% improvement); at 1440p, 128 to 160 FPS (25% improvement); at 4K, 71 to 89 FPS (25% improvement). This consistent 25% uplift suggests a specific rendering feature or shadow quality setting that significantly impacts GPU load when disabled.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For 1080p displays, the High preset at 194 FPS provides an excellent balance for competitive multiplayer, as it offers nearly double the refresh rate of standard 60 Hz monitors while maintaining visual fidelity above Low settings. However, for users with 144 Hz or 240 Hz displays, the Medium preset at 243 FPS (minimum 206) ensures the frame rate never dips below the display's refresh rate, making it the safer choice for maintaining smooth, tear-free gameplay.

At 1440p, the High preset at 128 FPS is well-suited for 120 Hz displays, while Medium at 160 FPS (minimum 136) provides headroom for 144 Hz panels and delivers a 25% performance boost over High with presumably minimal visual degradation. The Ultra preset at 99 FPS is viable for 100 Hz displays but offers diminishing returns for competitive play where frame rate consistency matters more than maximum visual detail.

For 4K gaming, the Low preset at 112 FPS is the only option that comfortably exceeds 100 FPS, making it the recommended choice for high-refresh-rate 4K monitors. Medium at 89 FPS (minimum 75) is acceptable for 60 Hz displays and provides better visual quality than Low, while High at 71 FPS and Ultra at 55 FPS are best reserved for slower-paced gameplay or cinematic experiences where frame rate is less critical than visual fidelity.

The data suggests that Medium settings offer the most versatile experience across all resolutions, providing the best combination of frame rate headroom and visual quality. The consistent 25% performance advantage of Medium over High, coupled with the minimum FPS figures staying well above 60 at 1440p and 4K, makes it the safest recommendation for this hardware combination.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to use with this hardware for competitive play?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 with Medium settings delivers 243 FPS average (minimum 206 FPS), which provides the highest frame rate headroom with quality settings that remain visually acceptable. At 2560x1440 Medium, the 160 FPS average (minimum 136 FPS) is also viable for high-refresh-rate competitive monitors, but the 1080p option provides more margin for frame rate dips in busy multiplayer scenarios.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The measured results show 112 FPS at 4K Low, 89 FPS at 4K Medium (minimum 75 FPS), 71 FPS at 4K High, and 55 FPS at 4K Ultra. For smooth 60 FPS gameplay, Medium settings are the highest quality preset that consistently stays above that threshold, while Low settings are necessary for 100+ FPS performance.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB VRAM affect Fivem performance?

A: The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for Fivem's textures and assets even at 4K resolution. The performance scaling between settings presets suggests that compute throughput, not memory capacity, is the limiting factor — the 25% performance drop from Medium to High settings at all resolutions points to GPU shading load rather than VRAM constraints.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700 bottlenecking the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in this game?

A: The data does not indicate a significant CPU bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see frame rates plateau at lower resolutions regardless of settings. Instead, the measured FPS scales consistently with resolution and settings, with 1080p Low reaching 290 FPS — a figure that suggests the CPU can supply frames faster than most displays can refresh. The 8 cores and 16 threads with 4.60 GHz boost clock appear sufficient for Fivem's workload.

Q: What is the expected frame rate difference between High and Ultra settings?

A: Across all tested resolutions, Ultra settings reduce average FPS by approximately 22-24% compared to High. At 1080p, the drop is from 194 to 151 FPS; at 1440p, from 128 to 99 FPS; and at 4K, from 71 to 55 FPS. This consistent reduction suggests Ultra enables a specific set of demanding effects that have a uniform cost regardless of resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: This pairing ranks 495th out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 13.4% of all configurations. This ranking is consistent with the individual component percentiles — the GPU sits at the 76th percentile and the CPU at the 78th percentile — indicating a well-balanced system that performs as expected relative to other hardware pairings.