Fivem
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 42 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 15 | 20 | 25 | 31 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 35 | 44 | 56 |
| 1080p Full HD | 42 | 54 | 67 | 85 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 580, In-Depth Analysis
# Fivem Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 580
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 580 presents a mixed picture for Fivem, a multiplayer title that leans heavily on both CPU and GPU resources depending on the resolution and settings. Benchmark data shows this combination ranking 2723rd out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the lower third of systems. The measured frame rates reveal a configuration that can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings but struggles significantly as resolution increases, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data across resolutions, settings, and component roles.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a steep decline in performance as resolution increases, a pattern that clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 85 FPS, which drops to 56 FPS at 1440p and further to 31 FPS at 4K. This represents a 63.5% drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the RX 580's rendering capabilities are quickly overwhelmed by the increased pixel count.
The scaling pattern becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. At High settings, the frame rate falls from 54 FPS at 1080p to 35 FPS at 1440p (a 35.2% reduction) and then to 20 FPS at 4K (a 63% reduction from 1080p). This non-linear scaling suggests that the RX 580, with its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory and 256-bit bus, cannot sustain the memory bandwidth and fill rate demands of 4K rendering. The pixel rate of 42.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 193.0 GTexel/s become insufficient as resolution increases.
At Medium settings, the data shows a similar trend: 67 FPS at 1080p, 44 FPS at 1440p, and 25 FPS at 4K. The min FPS values at Medium settings (57 at 1080p, 38 at 1440p, 21 at 4K) indicate that even the lower bounds of performance degrade proportionally with resolution. The gap between 1440p and 4K performance at Medium settings (44 to 25 FPS, a 43.2% drop) is particularly telling, as this is where the GPU's fill rate limitations become most apparent.
The data suggests that at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 7400F with its 6 cores and 12 threads is capable of feeding the GPU adequately, as evidenced by the relatively high frame rates at Low settings. However, as resolution increases, the RX 580's compute throughput of 6.175 TFLOPS becomes the dominant constraint. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings (85 to 56 FPS, a 34.1% drop) is less severe than the 1440p to 4K transition (56 to 31 FPS, a 44.6% drop), suggesting that the GPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a critical bottleneck at 4K.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides clear guidance on the optimal settings for this hardware combination. At 1080p, Medium settings offer the best balance of visual quality and performance, delivering 67 FPS average with a minimum of 57 FPS. This is comfortably above the threshold for smooth gameplay in a multiplayer title like Fivem, where responsiveness matters. The jump from Low to Medium costs 18 FPS (85 to 67, a 21.2% reduction) but presumably offers meaningful visual improvements.
At 1440p, the situation becomes more constrained. Low settings deliver 56 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 44 FPS and High falls to 35 FPS. The data indicates that Low settings are the pragmatic choice at 1440p for maintaining frame rates above 50 FPS. The RX 580's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for these settings, but the GPU's compute resources are stretched.
At 4K, none of the settings deliver acceptable performance. The highest frame rate achieved is 31 FPS at Low settings, which is below the threshold for fluid gameplay in a fast-paced multiplayer environment. Ultra settings at 4K yield only 15 FPS, making the experience borderline unplayable. The data strongly suggests that 4K is not a viable resolution for this combination.
The Ultra preset consistently underperforms across all resolutions: 42 FPS at 1080p, 27 FPS at 1440p, and 15 FPS at 4K. Compared to Medium settings, Ultra sacrifices 25 FPS at 1080p (67 to 42, a 37.3% reduction) for what is likely a marginal visual improvement in a game like Fivem. The measured data indicates that Medium settings at 1080p provide the best experience, with High settings (54 FPS) as a viable alternative for users prioritizing visual fidelity over frame rate headroom.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this system in Fivem?
A: The measured data shows 1080p with Medium settings delivers 67 FPS average with a 57 FPS minimum, making it the only configuration that balances playability and visual quality. At 1440p, Low settings achieve 56 FPS, while 4K is not viable at any setting.
Q: How does the RX 580's VRAM capacity affect Fivem performance?
A: The 8 GB GDDR5 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for all tested settings at 1080p and 1440p. The performance degradation at 4K (31 FPS at Low, 15 FPS at Ultra) is more attributable to the GPU's compute throughput of 6.175 TFLOPS than to VRAM capacity limitations.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F bottlenecking the RX 580 in this game?
A: At 1080p Low settings, the system reaches 85 FPS, suggesting the CPU can drive the GPU effectively at lower resolutions. However, at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 42 FPS, and at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as evidenced by the steep scaling losses.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1440p High is 35 FPS. This is below the typical threshold for smooth multiplayer gameplay, making Low settings (56 FPS) or Medium settings (44 FPS) more appropriate choices at this resolution.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems in Fivem?
A: This combination ranks 2723rd out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in approximately the 9th percentile. The RX 580's GPU benchmark percentile of 53 and the CPU's percentile of 83 indicate a significant imbalance in this pairing for Fivem's workload.
Q: Does the game show better scaling from Low to Medium or from Medium to Ultra?
A: At 1080p, the Low-to-Medium transition costs 18 FPS (85 to 67), while Medium-to-Ultra costs 25 FPS (67 to 42). The data shows diminishing returns at higher settings, with Ultra providing the worst performance-per-frame-rate tradeoff.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best performance. Low settings achieve 85 FPS average, Medium settings hit 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS and maximum of 77 FPS, High settings reach 54 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 42 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 43 FPS, representing a 50.6% performance penalty for maximum visual quality.
At 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly across all settings. Low settings yield 56 FPS, Medium delivers 44 FPS with a minimum of 38 FPS and maximum of 51 FPS, High settings produce 35 FPS, and Ultra settings manage only 27 FPS. The resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p costs between 29 FPS (at Low, 85 to 56) and 15 FPS (at Ultra, 42 to 27).
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings achieve 31 FPS, Medium delivers 25 FPS with a minimum of 21 FPS and maximum of 28 FPS, High settings reach 20 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 15 FPS. The 4K resolution represents a 63.5% reduction from 1080p performance at Low settings, highlighting the GPU's limitations at this resolution.
The data shows a consistent pattern: the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference is 43 FPS (85 to 42); at 1440p, it is 29 FPS (56 to 27); at 4K, it narrows to 16 FPS (31 to 15). This compression at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is saturated regardless of settings, with the frame rate ceiling determined by the RX 580's raw throughput rather than settings complexity.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 580, based on the Polaris 20 chip with GCN 4.0 architecture, plays the dominant role in limiting Fivem's performance at higher resolutions. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p at most settings but becomes strained at 4K. The base clock of 1257 MHz and boost clock of 1340 MHz, combined with 2304 shading units, deliver 6.175 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is modest by modern standards.
The benchmark data for the RX 580 shows a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1005 and a Passmark G3D score of 8813, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile (0.1% faster), the GTX 1660 SUPER (0.4% faster), and the AMD Radeon 740M (0.5% slower). These comparisons indicate that the RX 580 sits in the middle of the GPU performance curve, which is consistent with the observed Fivem frame rates.
The GPU's 14 nm process node and 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die contribute to its 185 W TDP, requiring a 450 W suggested PSU. The memory clock of 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) provides the bandwidth needed for texture-heavy scenes, but the 32 ROPs and 144 TMUs become limiting factors at 4K. The pixel rate of 42.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 193.0 GTexel/s are insufficient for 4K rendering, explaining the sharp drop to 15-31 FPS at that resolution.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael), provides ample computational headroom for Fivem at lower resolutions. With a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, this CPU delivers strong single-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and Passmark single-thread score of 3689. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core help reduce latency in multiplayer scenarios.
The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded capabilities, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and Passmark multithread score of 25645. This places the Ryzen 5 7400F in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with its average benchmark score of 32750 nearly matching the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% faster) and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.2% faster). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% slower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.3% faster.
In Fivem, the CPU's role is most apparent at 1080p Low settings, where the system achieves 85 FPS. This suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions. However, at 1080p Ultra (42 FPS) and all 1440p and 4K settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's 65 W TDP and DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth ensure that memory bandwidth is not a constraint, but the game's workload at higher resolutions shifts entirely to the GPU.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 580 ranks 2723rd out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower 9.4% of systems tested. This ranking reflects the significant imbalance between the CPU's performance percentile (83rd) and the GPU's percentile (53rd). The CPU is clearly capable of driving more powerful graphics hardware, but the RX 580 holds the system back in this game.
The measured FPS data supports this ranking. At 1080p Medium settings, the system achieves 67 FPS, which is playable but not exceptional. At 1440p, performance drops to a range of 27-56 FPS depending on settings, and at 4K, the system cannot maintain playable frame rates at any setting. The combo's rank of 2723 out of 3005 suggests that most other tested configurations deliver better Fivem performance.
The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance ceiling. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, which is 0.4% faster in average benchmark score, would likely deliver similar Fivem frame rates. The AMD Radeon 740M, at 0.5% slower, represents the lower bound of comparable performance. These narrow margins indicate that the RX 580's performance class is well-defined, and the Fivem results reflect this positioning.
The CPU's ranking among rivals shows that it is not a bottleneck in this configuration. The Ryzen 5 7400F's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, achieves a nearly identical average benchmark score (0.1% difference), suggesting that any of these CPUs would produce similar Fivem results when paired with the RX 580. The data indicates that upgrading the GPU would yield significantly better Fivem performance, while CPU upgrades would provide minimal gains in this specific game.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
AMD Radeon RX 580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 580 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 31.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 25.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 20.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 56.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 44.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 27.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 67.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 54.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 42.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 580 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.