Fivem

Fivem is a multiplayer modification framework that builds on the Grand Theft Auto V engine, and its performance profile is distinct from single-player benchmarks. This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, using the measured frame rate data to identify where the bottleneck lies and how the combination performs across common resolutions and settings.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data shows a clear and consistent pattern of scaling from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K. At High settings, the average FPS moves from 195.5 at 1920x1080 to 127.4 at 2560x1440, a drop of 68.1 FPS. Moving from 1440p to 4K (3840x2160) brings the average down to 72.4, a further reduction of 55 FPS. This progression is expected, but the magnitude of the drop reveals a system that becomes progressively more GPU-bound as resolution increases.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p results in a 34.9% reduction in frame rate at High settings. This is a substantial decline, suggesting that even at 1440p, the GPU is being pushed significantly harder. The transition to 4K is even more punishing, with a 43.2% reduction from the 1440p result. The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is likely the primary limiting factor, as the frame rates are extremely high (277.6 FPS at Low settings) and the GPU has ample headroom. At 4K, the situation reverses, and the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with the frame rate dropping to a range where the CPU’s influence is less pronounced.

The difference between Low and Ultra settings also highlights the GPU’s workload. At 1080p, the gap between Low (277.6 FPS) and Ultra (153.2 FPS) is 124.4 FPS, showing that the GPU is doing more work per frame at higher presets. At 4K, the same Low-to-Ultra gap is 58.7 FPS (110.2 to 51.5), which is a smaller absolute difference but a larger relative one, indicating that the GPU is already saturated. The data strongly suggests that users targeting 4K will need to adjust settings to maintain playable frame rates, while 1080p and 1440p offer much more headroom.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective. These specifications are critical for high-resolution gaming, as Fivem’s open-world environments and dense multiplayer lobbies can consume significant video memory. The 16 GB capacity is generous and likely prevents any memory-related stuttering at the tested resolutions, even at Ultra settings.

The GPU’s boost clock is 2610 MHz, based on a base clock of 2340 MHz. This clock speed, combined with the 8448 shading units and 264 texture mapping units, allows for high fill rates. The pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s. These figures explain why the GPU can handle 4K at Low settings with an average of 110.2 FPS, but they also show that Ultra settings at 4K (51.5 FPS) push the architecture to its limits. The FP32 performance of 44.10 TFLOPS is substantial, yet the data shows that the game’s engine is not purely compute-bound at lower resolutions.

The GPU’s benchmark results place it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48704. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, which scores 49071 (a delta of -0.7%), and the NVIDIA RTX A2000, which scores 47915 (a delta of 1.6%). This indicates the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a high-end performer, but in Fivem, the measured results show that it is not always the limiting factor. At 1080p, the GPU is often waiting for the CPU, as evidenced by the relatively small frame rate differences between Medium (243.1 FPS) and High (195.5 FPS) compared to the larger jumps seen at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds a combo rank of 231 out of 1792 tested combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 12.9% of all tested systems, which is a strong result for a multiplayer-focused title. The rank suggests that while the combination is powerful, there are other pairings that achieve higher frame rates in this specific game.

The ranking is influenced by both components. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19983, putting it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core i7-11800H and the AMD EPYC 7713P, both with an average score of 20024, representing a delta of -0.2% for the 5600G. This shows the CPU is competitive but not a top-tier performer. The GPU, however, is in the 86th percentile, which is higher. The combination’s rank of 231 likely reflects the CPU holding the system back in scenarios where frame rates are extremely high, such as at 1080p with Low settings.

The data indicates that the combo performs better at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the bottleneck. At 4K High, the average FPS of 72.4 is respectable, but at 1080p Low, the 277.6 FPS is likely below what a more powerful CPU could achieve with the same GPU. This suggests that users with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors might not fully utilize the GPU’s potential, while 1440p and 4K users will see a more balanced performance profile.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates are as follows: Low settings deliver 277.6 FPS, Medium settings deliver 243.1 FPS, High settings deliver 195.5 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 153.2 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a gradual decrease, with the largest single drop occurring between Medium and High (47.6 FPS). This indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at this resolution, and the GPU is not fully saturated until the Ultra preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 201.8 FPS at Low, 162.1 FPS at Medium, 127.4 FPS at High, and 99.1 FPS at Ultra. The drop from Low to Medium is 39.7 FPS, and from Medium to High is 34.7 FPS. The scaling here is more uniform, suggesting that both CPU and GPU are being utilized more equally. The 1440p results are still high enough for smooth gameplay on most displays.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 110.2 FPS at Low, 91.1 FPS at Medium, 72.4 FPS at High, and 51.5 FPS at Ultra. The differences between presets are smaller in absolute terms (19.1 FPS from Low to Medium, 18.7 FPS from Medium to High), but the relative impact is more significant. The 4K data clearly shows the GPU is the limiting factor, as the frame rates are moderate and the CPU’s influence is diminished. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, making it potentially unsuitable for competitive play.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the best experience depends on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p users with a 144Hz monitor, the High preset at 195.5 FPS is an excellent choice, as it provides a substantial visual improvement over Medium (243.1 FPS) while still offering frame rates well above the refresh rate. The Ultra preset at 153.2 FPS also clears the 144Hz threshold, but the jump from High to Ultra only yields a 42.3 FPS difference, which may not justify the visual cost for all users.

For 1440p users, the High preset at 127.4 FPS is the recommended starting point. It provides a smooth experience for 120Hz displays, and the Medium preset at 162.1 FPS is a viable alternative for those prioritizing higher frame rates. The Ultra preset at 99.1 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced multiplayer scenarios where higher frame rates are advantageous.

At 4K, the data suggests that the High preset at 72.4 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 91.1 FPS is also a strong option for those who prefer higher frame rates, while the Ultra preset at 51.5 FPS is only suitable for users who prioritize maximum visual fidelity and can tolerate frame rates below 60 FPS. The Low preset at 110.2 FPS is available for competitive play, but the visual compromise is significant.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. It is built on the Zen 3 architecture using a 7 nm process from TSMC. Its L3 cache is 16 MB, and it supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. These specifications are adequate for gaming, but the data suggests they are a limiting factor in Fivem at lower resolutions.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 16758 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2365 in single-core. Its single-thread performance is crucial for Fivem, which is known to be sensitive to CPU performance. The 3DMark single-thread score is 872, and the PassMark single-thread score is 3177. These scores place the CPU in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19983. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-11600H (0.2% higher score) and the Intel Core i7-11800H (0.2% lower score), indicating that the 5600G is in the same performance tier as these mobile processors.

The CPU’s role is most apparent in the 1080p results. The frame rate at Low settings (277.6 FPS) is exceptionally high, but it is likely capped by the CPU’s single-thread performance. The data shows that the frame rate does not scale linearly with GPU load at this resolution, which is a common sign of a CPU bottleneck. At 4K, the CPU’s influence is reduced, and the frame rates are more dependent on the GPU. This suggests that users who play at 1080p with high refresh rate monitors may benefit from a more powerful CPU, while those at 1440p or above will see a more balanced system.