Evolve

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination delivers a robust performance profile in Evolve, as evidenced by the measured frame rates across a range of resolutions and settings. The data indicates a system well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gameplay, with the RTX 3080 Ti providing enough headroom to maintain playable frame rates at 4K. This analysis breaks down the specific contributions of the CPU and GPU, examines resolution scaling, and provides actionable settings recommendations based solely on the provided benchmark data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz, which can boost up to 5.00 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. In the context of Evolve, a first-person shooter, the CPU's role is primarily to handle game logic, AI, and frame pacing. The benchmark results show that the CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

The processor's single-thread performance is a strong indicator of its gaming capability. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2085 and the Passmark single-thread score of 4516 place it in a high-performance tier. This is critical for Evolve, as the minimum frame rates (where present) suggest the game's engine relies on strong single-core performance. The data shows that at 1080p with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 172, which is far above the threshold for a playable experience, indicating the CPU is well-equipped to feed frames to the GPU without causing stutters. The CPU's overall benchmark percentile of 89, compared to all CPUs, reinforces its high-end status. Its average benchmark score of 46062 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030) and the Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098), showing that the Core Ultra 5 235 is directly comparable to these top-tier mobile and desktop parts in raw processing power.

While the CPU's 14 cores are more than sufficient for gaming, the data suggests that the primary performance driver in Evolve is the GPU. For instance, at 4K Ultra settings, the system averages 42 FPS. If the CPU were a limiting factor, we would expect to see a more significant drop in performance at lower resolutions where the CPU has to work harder to keep up with high frame rates. However, the 1080p Low setting yields 261 FPS, demonstrating that the CPU can handle exceptionally high frame output. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6202 and the Passmark multithread score of 37816 indicate substantial multi-threaded capability. This power isn't necessarily the deciding factor in Evolve's frame rates, but it ensures that background tasks and the game's own threading won't introduce performance dips. The data supports the conclusion that this CPU provides a stable, high-performance foundation that allows the RTX 3080 Ti to operate at its full potential.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing for Evolve. It is built on the Ampere architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a substantial 912.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is particularly relevant for a game like Evolve, where high-resolution textures and effects can quickly consume VRAM and bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 1365 MHz, with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and it has a 350 W TDP. With 10,240 shading units and 80 RT cores, it is a high-end graphics card, as reflected by its 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs.

The GPU benchmarks show its raw compute power. The Passmark G3D score of 26896 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697 indicate strong DirectX and Vulkan performance, which is essential for modern game engines. In the measured FPS data, the GPU's role is clearly visible. The scaling from Low to Ultra settings at each resolution shows the GPU's workload increasing as visual fidelity rises. For example, at 1440p, the average FPS drops from 175 on Low to 74 on Ultra, a clear sign that the GPU is being pushed harder by the more demanding settings. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is likely sufficient for Evolve at all tested settings, as there is no data to suggest a memory capacity bottleneck. The performance drop from Medium to Ultra is more about the compute load and memory bandwidth pressure from advanced effects.

The RTX 3080 Ti's performance relative to its rivals is interesting. Its average benchmark score of 41187 is slightly higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377), but lower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41707). This suggests that while the RTX 3080 Ti is a powerful card, its performance is closely matched by other high-end options. In Evolve, this translates to high frame rates across the board, but the GPU is undeniably the limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings. The measured 60 FPS average at 4K High and 42 FPS at 4K Ultra show that the GPU's performance ceiling is reached at this resolution, making it the primary determinant of the gaming experience. The GPU's passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 is a specific data point that, while low compared to other tests, is part of the overall benchmark suite and doesn't detract from its strong G3D performance.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales across resolutions. At 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound, with frame rates high enough to be limited by the game's engine or CPU processing speed. The transition to 1440p and then 4K shows a predictable and pronounced decline, indicating a shift to a GPU-bound scenario. This scaling analysis confirms that the RTX 3080 Ti is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions.

Looking at the Medium settings preset, which has complete data (min/avg/max FPS), the scaling is most illustrative. At 1920x1080, the average FPS is 202, with a minimum of 172 and a maximum of 232. Moving to 2560x1440, the average drops to 135 FPS, a 33% reduction. At 3840x2160, the average falls further to 77 FPS, which is a 43% reduction from the 1440p figure and 62% lower than the 1080p result. This steep decline in performance as resolution increases is a classic sign of a GPU-limited system. The CPU has less work to do per frame at lower resolutions, but as the pixel count increases, the GPU's fill rate and shading power become the bottleneck.

The Low settings preset shows even higher frame rates, with 261 FPS at 1080p, 175 FPS at 1440p, and 99 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 33% and 43% respectively, which is a similar pattern to the Medium preset. This consistency suggests that the game's rendering pipeline is well-optimized for scaling. The High and Ultra presets show a similar trend, with 4K Ultra dipping to just 42 FPS. This data indicates that for a smooth 60 FPS experience, the user must either lower the resolution to 1440p for High settings or reduce the settings to Low/Medium at 4K. The 4K Medium average of 77 FPS is the most balanced option for 4K, providing a frame rate well above the playable threshold. The data clearly shows that the CPU is not a limiting factor at 4K, as the frame rates are entirely dictated by the GPU's ability to render the higher pixel count.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combined performance of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Evolve is rated at rank 698 out of 2872 tested combos. This places the system in the top 25% of all configurations tested on this benchmark database. The rank is a composite score that takes into account all the measured FPS data across different resolutions and settings. A rank of 698 indicates that this is a high-performing combination, capable of delivering a very good gaming experience in Evolve, but it is not at the very top tier of performance.

The rank reflects the system's balanced capability. While the RTX 3080 Ti is a strong GPU, it is not the absolute fastest available, and its performance is comparable to other high-end cards from its generation. The CPU, while excellent, is also not the top-performing processor available, with its nearest rivals being a mix of mobile and server-class parts. The combination of these two components results in a system that is more powerful than the vast majority of setups, but there are still many combinations that outperform it. The fact that the GPU has a lower average benchmark score than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB, for instance, suggests that some workstation or professional cards could potentially yield higher frame rates in certain scenarios, though their gaming drivers and features are not optimized for titles like Evolve.

The rank of 698 is a strong endorsement of this combo's gaming capabilities. It signifies that a user can expect a high-refresh-rate experience at 1080p and 1440p and a playable 4K experience on high settings. The system is not at the absolute pinnacle of performance, but its position in the upper quartile confirms that it is a well-matched pairing with no significant bottleneck. The data implies that the system is well-balanced, where the CPU and GPU complement each other effectively, avoiding the situation where one component severely limits the other's potential. This is the hallmark of a well-chosen hardware combination.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends entirely on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate. For each resolution, there is a clear "sweet spot" that balances visual fidelity with performance. The data shows that the system can handle even the most demanding settings at lower resolutions, but compromises are necessary at 4K.

At 1920x1080, the system is so powerful that even the Ultra preset is highly playable, averaging 110 FPS. For a competitive or high-refresh-rate experience, the Low preset, which averages 261 FPS, is the best choice, though the Medium preset at 202 FPS offers a better balance of visuals and speed. The High preset at 158 FPS is also an excellent all-around choice. The data suggests that at 1080p, the user has the freedom to choose any preset based on their preference for visual quality over frame rate, as even the most demanding option remains fluid. The minimum FPS of 172 on Medium ensures there are no major hitches.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended choice, with an average of 106 FPS. This provides a great balance between image quality and smoothness. The Medium preset at 135 FPS is also a strong option for those who prioritize a higher frame rate. The Ultra preset, at 74 FPS, is still playable but is not the best experience for fast-paced action. The Low preset at 175 FPS is ideal for maximum competitive performance. For the best overall experience at 1440p, High settings are recommended, as they are visually impressive while maintaining a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the clear winner, delivering an average of 77 FPS with a minimum of 66 FPS. This is the only 4K preset that consistently stays above the 60 FPS mark. The High preset averages exactly 60 FPS, but this leaves no headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 42 FPS is not recommended for a smooth experience. The Low preset at 99 FPS is viable for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, but it sacrifices significant visual quality. Therefore, for 4K gaming, the Medium preset offers the best compromise, providing a solid frame rate with good visual fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this system to achieve a consistent 60+ FPS?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440 with High settings, the system averages 106 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience. At 3840x2160, only the Medium and Low presets average above 60 FPS (77 and 99 respectively), with the High preset hitting exactly 60 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more of a limiting factor in this game?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 4K, indicating a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p, the frame rates are very high, suggesting the CPU can keep up, but the GPU's rendering workload becomes the primary constraint as resolution increases.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti's performance compare to its listed rivals?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41187. This is 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870) and 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377). It is 1.2% lower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41707).

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming with the highest settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system averages only 42 FPS, which is below the standard for smooth gameplay. The High preset achieves exactly 60 FPS, but the Medium preset is recommended for a more consistent experience.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 261, which was measured at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 235 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900HX?

A: The Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900HX's score of 46098. They are effectively performance equals in the provided benchmark data.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following is a complete breakdown of the measured frame rates for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Evolve. The data shows average frames per second (FPS), with minimum and maximum FPS provided where available.

1920x1080

| Settings | Average FPS | Minimum FPS | Maximum FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Low | 261 | - | - |

| Medium | 202 | 172 | 232 |

| High | 158 | - | - |

| Ultra | 110 | - | - |

2560x1440

| Settings | Average FPS | Minimum FPS | Maximum FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Low | 175 | - | - |

| Medium | 135 | 115 | 156 |

| High | 106 | - | - |

| Ultra | 74 | - | - |

3840x2160

| Settings | Average FPS | Minimum FPS | Maximum FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Low | 99 | - | - |

| Medium | 77 | 66 | 89 |

| High | 60 | - | - |

| Ultra | 42 | - | - |