Evolve

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H pairs a 14-core, 18-thread Meteor Lake design with a 3.60 GHz base clock and a 4.60 GHz boost clock. This mobile processor, with its 18 MB of shared L3 cache, delivers benchmark scores that place it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29093. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, scores 29123, a negligible 0.1% difference, placing the two effectively on par. In contrast, the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, which is 0.6% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, a 0.5% deficit. For a game like Evolve, which launched in 2015, the CPU's capabilities are more than sufficient to feed a modern GPU, as evidenced by the high frame rates at lower resolutions where the processor's single-threaded performance becomes more relevant. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1700 indicates solid per-thread performance, ensuring that the game's core simulation logic won't be a bottleneck at high frame rates.

The processor's power envelope is rated at 28 W TDP, a mobile-focused figure, but its performance in standardized tests shows it competes with desktop parts from a previous generation. The Passmark multithread score of 22422 and the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7834 highlight its capability in multi-threaded workloads, which is typical for modern game engines that offload physics and AI tasks to multiple cores. Even though Evolve is an older title, the data suggests that the CPU has ample headroom, as the measured FPS at 1080p Low (220 FPS) shows a scenario where the CPU is likely the limiting factor, but still delivers an exceptionally smooth experience. The processor's position, with a 0.5% advantage over the Ryzen 5 5600XT, places it in a competitive tier where it will not hinder the RTX 5070 Ti in most gaming scenarios.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, built on Intel's 7 nm process. Its architecture, codenamed Meteor Lake, features a configuration where the L2 cache is allocated at 2 MB per core and the L3 cache is 18 MB shared. The base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz are moderate for a mobile chip, but the benchmark data shows strong performance. The average benchmark score of 29093 places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, has an average score of 29123, which is a 0.1% difference, making the two statistically equivalent in raw compute power.

In the context of Evolve, which is a 2015 FPS title, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, AI, and physics. The data from the measured FPS shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 220 FPS, which is the highest average FPS recorded across all settings and resolutions. This high frame rate at a CPU-bound setting (Low graphics reduces GPU load) suggests that the processor is capable of delivering very high frame rates, but it also indicates a potential ceiling. The single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 at 1700, is robust, ensuring that the game's main thread won't be a bottleneck. The multi-thread capabilities, with a Cinebench R23 score of 11875.5, provide additional headroom for background tasks and game engine threads.

The processor's performance relative to its rivals is telling. The Intel Core i5-13500HX is 0.6% faster, with a score of 29270, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT is 0.5% slower. This tight grouping means that in Evolve, the CPU choice among these three would yield nearly identical results. The data shows that at 1080p Medium, the combo hits 171 FPS, and at 1080p High, it hits 134 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU can comfortably push well beyond 100 FPS in this title, even at higher settings, as long as the GPU can keep up. The bottleneck at lower settings is likely the CPU's single-thread speed, but with 220 FPS at 1080p Low, it is a high ceiling that most displays cannot fully utilize.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a high-end GPU from the GeForce 50-series, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process. It features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2452 MHz, and it has a TDP of 300 W. With 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, the RTX 5070 Ti is a formidable graphics processor, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 49957. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, has an average score of 50001, a 0.1% difference, while the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, which is 2% higher.

In Evolve, the GPU's role is to render the game's environments, characters, and effects. The 16 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for this title, even at 4K Ultra settings, where the measured average FPS drops to 35. The high memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming is not a bottleneck. The data shows that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the GPU achieves 220 FPS, but this is likely CPU-limited. As the resolution increases, the GPU load increases, and the frame rates drop accordingly. At 1440p High, the average FPS is 90, while at 4K High, it drops to 51. This indicates that the GPU's raw compute power is the determining factor at these higher resolutions.

The GPU's performance in standardized benchmarks shows it is comparable to the RX Vega 64, with a 0.1% difference. However, the RTX 5070 Ti's modern architecture provides features like DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which is relevant for Evolve's later updates. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU can handle 4K Medium at 65 FPS, which is playable, but 4K Ultra at 35 FPS is not smooth. The 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, as it prevents any memory-related stuttering, even at 4K Ultra with high-resolution textures. The GPU's clock speeds, with a boost of 2452 MHz, are high, but the data suggests that the architectural efficiency is what drives the performance, as the scores are in line with older, more power-hungry GPUs like the RX 6900 XT.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales with resolution. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 220, which is the highest recorded. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 148, a 32.7% decrease. At 4K Low, the average is 84, a 61.8% decrease from 1080p Low. This scaling pattern indicates that at Low settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, but the CPU is still capable of pushing high frame rates at 1080p. The drop from 220 to 148 FPS when moving from 1080p to 1440p is significant, showing that the GPU's workload at 1440p is substantially higher.

With High settings, the scaling is different. At 1080p High, the average is 134 FPS. At 1440p High, it drops to 90 FPS, a 32.8% decrease. At 4K High, it drops to 51 FPS, a 61.9% decrease from 1080p. The percentage decreases are very similar to the Low settings, indicating that the relative performance scaling is consistent. This suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at all resolutions when settings are increased, as the CPU has enough headroom to handle the increased draw calls. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is roughly 44 FPS at High settings, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 39 FPS, showing a slightly diminishing return as resolution increases.

The Medium settings data includes min and max FPS values, providing additional insight. At 1080p Medium, the average is 171 FPS, with a min of 145 and a max of 196. At 1440p Medium, the average is 115 FPS, with a min of 97 and a max of 132. At 4K Medium, the average is 65 FPS, with a min of 55 and a max of 75. The consistent scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, with roughly 32% and 43% drops respectively, confirms that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU is not a bottleneck at these settings, as the frame rates remain high even at 1440p. The data indicates that for a smooth experience, the user should target 1080p or 1440p, as 4K requires a significant compromise in settings to achieve playable frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Evolve?

A: The highest average FPS is 220, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X's score of 29123, making them effectively equal in performance.

Q: What is the average FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 35, which is the lowest recorded in the dataset.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor at 1080p Low settings?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 220 FPS, which is likely CPU-limited, as the low graphics settings reduce the GPU load to a point where the processor's single-thread performance becomes the ceiling.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49957.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 115, with a minimum of 97 and a maximum of 132.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ranks 1059 out of 2872 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the upper echelon of systems, but not at the very top. The rank is a composite measure of how well the CPU and GPU work together in this specific game. Given that the CPU is in the 81st percentile and the GPU is in the 86th percentile, the combo rank of 1059 (which is the 63rd percentile of combos) suggests that the pairing is well-balanced, but not perfectly optimized. The data shows that the system is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles at 4K Ultra.

The rank of 1059 out of 2872 means that there are 1058 combos that perform better in Evolve. This is likely due to more powerful CPUs or GPUs, or a better balance between the two. For instance, a combo with a higher-end CPU might achieve better frame rates at 1080p Low, where the CPU is the bottleneck. Conversely, a combo with a more powerful GPU, such as the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT which scores 2% higher, might achieve better performance at 4K. The combo's rank is a reflection of its overall capability, and the data shows that it is a strong performer, but not a top-tier one. The 2872 combos in the database represent a wide range of hardware, and this particular pairing falls in the top 37% of all tested combinations.

The rank is also influenced by the game's age. Evolve is a 2015 title, which means it may not be optimized for modern hardware, potentially leading to unexpected bottlenecks. The data suggests that the combo is well-suited for this game, but the rank indicates that there are many other systems that can achieve higher frame rates. The 1059 rank is a data point that reflects the measured performance, and it is important to consider the specific resolutions and settings when interpreting it. At 1080p, the combo is likely to rank higher than at 4K, given the CPU's strong performance and the GPU's capabilities.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves an average of 220 FPS on Low settings, 171 FPS on Medium, 134 FPS on High, and 93 FPS on Ultra. The Medium settings show a min of 145 and a max of 196, indicating a stable frame rate. The drop from Low to Ultra is 127 FPS, showing a significant impact of graphics settings on performance. At 1080p, the system is capable of delivering a highly playable experience at all settings, with even Ultra settings exceeding 90 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 148 on Low, 115 on Medium, 90 on High, and 62 on Ultra. The Medium settings show a min of 97 and a max of 132. The drop from Low to Ultra is 86 FPS. At 1440p, the system still delivers playable frame rates at all settings, with Ultra settings at 62 FPS being marginally acceptable for a 2015 game. The data shows a consistent reduction in performance as settings increase, with the GPU becoming more of a limiting factor. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at each setting is roughly 72 FPS on Low, 56 FPS on Medium, 44 FPS on High, and 31 FPS on Ultra, showing that the resolution scaling is more pronounced at lower settings.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS is 84 on Low, 65 on Medium, 51 on High, and 35 on Ultra. The Medium settings show a min of 55 and a max of 75. The drop from Low to Ultra is 49 FPS. At 4K, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates, with only Low settings exceeding 60 FPS. The Ultra setting at 35 FPS is not playable for most users. The data indicates that 4K is only viable with Low or Medium settings, and even then, the frame rates are not ideal for a fast-paced FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is significant, with a 64 FPS drop on Low, 50 FPS on Medium, 39 FPS on High, and 27 FPS on Ultra. This confirms that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the data shows that Ultra settings at 93 FPS provide a smooth experience, and High settings at 134 FPS are even better. Given that the game is from 2015, the visual difference between High and Ultra may not be significant, but the 41 FPS increase from Ultra to High is substantial. For a competitive FPS, High settings at 1080p are recommended, as they offer a high frame rate with minimal visual compromise. Medium settings at 171 FPS are also viable for users who prioritize frame rate above all else.

For 2560x1440, the data shows that High settings at 90 FPS provide a good balance between visual quality and performance. Ultra settings at 62 FPS are playable, but the frame rate is close to the edge of what is considered smooth for a fast-paced game. Medium settings at 115 FPS are a better option for users who want a higher frame rate, as the visual difference between Medium and High is often less noticeable than the frame rate difference. The 25 FPS increase from High to Medium may be worth the slight reduction in visual fidelity. Low settings at 148 FPS are recommended for competitive play, where frame rate is paramount.

For 3840x2160, the data shows that only Low settings at 84 FPS and Medium settings at 65 FPS are viable options. High settings at 51 FPS and Ultra settings at 35 FPS are not recommended for a smooth experience. Medium settings at 65 FPS provide a playable experience, but users may need to tolerate some visual compromises. Low settings at 84 FPS are the safest choice for 4K, as they offer a frame rate that is close to 60 FPS and above. The data indicates that 4K gaming with this combo requires a significant sacrifice in settings, and users who prioritize frame rate should consider 1440p instead. The best overall experience per the data is 1080p High or 1440p Medium, depending on the user's preference for resolution or visual quality.