Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination presents a specific performance profile in Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. The measured data reveals how the system scales across resolutions and settings, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck at higher loads while the CPU provides ample headroom at lower settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, compares the combo against other tested configurations, and examines the roles of each component.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and clearly indicates a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 107 at 1920x1080 to 72 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 35 FPS or roughly 33%. Moving to 3840x2160, the average drops further to 41 FPS, which is a 62% decrease from the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a graphics card reaching its limits, as the number of pixels more than doubles when moving from 1440p to 4K, yet the frame rate does not halve, suggesting some efficiency in the rendering pipeline.

The scaling at Low settings is even more revealing. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 176 FPS, which drops to 118 FPS at 1440p and 67 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 62%, identical to the High preset, but the absolute numbers are much higher. This consistency in relative scaling across presets suggests that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors, rather than any specific setting like shadows or textures. When the load is lightened at Low settings, the GPU can push more frames, but the resolution increase still overwhelms its capabilities.

The Medium preset provides partial data, with min and max FPS recorded only at this level. At 1080p Medium, the average is 137 FPS, with a min of 116 and max of 157. At 1440p Medium, the average is 92 FPS, with a min of 78 and max of 105. At 4K Medium, the average is 52 FPS, with a min of 44 and max of 60. The spread between min and max FPS is relatively narrow, around 30% of the average, indicating stable frame pacing without severe stutters. This suggests that while the GPU is heavily loaded, it does not experience catastrophic frame time spikes.

Ultra settings show the most severe drop, with 4K averaging 28 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The gap between High and Ultra at 4K is 13 FPS, a 32% reduction, while at 1080p the gap is 33 FPS, a 31% reduction. This proportional drop implies that Ultra settings add a consistent load on the GPU across all resolutions, likely from increased draw distances or post-processing effects. The data confirms that the RX 9060 is the primary limiting component at 4K, while at 1080p the CPU begins to matter more, though the GPU still dominates the performance curve.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 5600F and RX 9060 ranks 1664 out of 2872 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the 58th percentile of all configurations, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of tested systems but is not a top-tier performer. The rank is a composite measure that accounts for the specific interaction between this CPU and GPU in this game, and it reflects the mid-range positioning of both components.

The GPU's individual benchmark percentile is 59, which is slightly higher than the combo's ranking percentile. This suggests that the CPU is not holding back the GPU significantly, but the pairing is not optimal for maximizing the GPU's potential. The CPU's percentile is 85, which is much higher than the GPU's, indicating that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can utilize in this title. In simpler terms, the system is GPU-limited in most scenarios, which is typical for a game like Evolve that relies heavily on rendering.

When compared to the nearest rival combos, the data shows a tight grouping. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, has an average benchmark score that is 0.7% higher than the RX 9060. This means that in synthetic tests, the two cards are nearly identical, but the actual in-game performance in Evolve may vary due to driver optimizations or game-specific code. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and RX 7700 are also close, with scores 1% higher and 1% lower, respectively. This indicates that the RX 9060 sits in a competitive performance band where small differences in architecture or clock speeds can shift the ranking.

The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, have average scores within 0.5% of the Ryzen 5 5600F. This shows that the CPU is also in a tight performance cluster, where the 5600F's six-core, twelve-thread configuration is competitive with newer and more expensive parts. In Evolve, which is a game from 2015, the CPU is likely not the bottleneck, and the ranking is dominated by the GPU's ability to render frames. The combo's rank of 1664 reflects that while the system is capable, it does not excel in this specific title compared to other high-end configurations.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the cornerstone of this system's gaming performance, and its specifications directly influence the measured FPS. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. In Evolve, this memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but at 4K Ultra, the 8 GB capacity may be a limiting factor, as the average FPS drops to 28. The memory bandwidth is also a consideration, as higher resolutions require more data to be transferred, and the 288.0 GB/s figure is modest by modern standards.

The clock speeds are another critical aspect. The base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. The large gap between base and boost clocks suggests that the GPU can dynamically scale its frequency based on thermal and power headroom. In Evolve, the boost clock is likely achieved in less demanding scenes, but sustained loads at 4K may cause the clock to settle closer to the game clock or lower. The data shows that at High settings, the FPS drops by 31% from 1080p to 1440p, which aligns with the GPU working harder to fill more pixels.

The shading units, texture mapping units, and ROPs are also relevant. With 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, the GPU has a balanced architecture for rasterization. The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. In Evolve, which is an FPS with dynamic environments, the texture rate is important for maintaining detail, while the pixel rate determines how fast the GPU can fill the screen. The measured FPS at Medium settings, which balance quality and load, shows that the GPU can sustain 137 FPS at 1080p, dropping to 92 at 1440p and 52 at 4K. This indicates that the GPU's compute power is adequate for medium detail at high frame rates, but Ultra settings push it beyond its comfort zone.

The GPU's memory type and bus width further constrain performance. The 128-bit bus is narrower than many competing cards, which often use 256-bit buses. This means that the RX 9060 must rely on higher clock speeds, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), to achieve its bandwidth. In Evolve, the impact of the narrow bus is more pronounced at 4K, where the data shows a significant drop in FPS from Medium to Ultra. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is also a potential issue at 4K Ultra, as textures may exceed the available memory, causing the system to fall back to slower system memory, which would explain the 28 FPS average.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 137, with a minimum of 116 and a maximum of 157.

*Q: How does the combo rank in Evolve compared to other tested configurations?*

A: The combo ranks 1664 out of 2872 tested combos, placing it in the 58th percentile of all systems.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the GPU is the limiting factor. The average FPS drops to 41 at High settings and 28 at Ultra, while the CPU has a percentile of 85, indicating it has more headroom than the GPU.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS is 118 at Low settings and 50 at Ultra settings, a difference of 68 FPS.

Q: Does the RX 9060 outperform the RTX 3060 Ti in synthetic benchmarks?

A: No, the RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score that is 0.7% higher than the RX 9060, making them nearly equal in synthetic tests.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 9060?

A: The RX 9060 has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, achieved with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and RX 9060 combination. At 1080p, the High preset delivers an average of 107 FPS, which is smooth for an FPS title. The Medium preset offers 137 FPS, a significant improvement, but the visual difference may not be worth the extra 30 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 74 FPS, which is still playable but may introduce noticeable frame time inconsistencies. For competitive play, the Low preset at 176 FPS is the best choice, as it maximizes responsiveness, but it sacrifices visual fidelity.

At 1440p, the situation changes. The High preset averages 72 FPS, which is acceptable for casual play but may feel less responsive in fast-paced moments. The Medium preset at 92 FPS strikes a better balance, providing a higher frame rate while maintaining decent visuals. The Low preset at 118 FPS is the best for performance, but it may look too sparse for some players. The Ultra preset at 50 FPS is not recommended, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 4K, none of the presets are ideal. The High preset averages 41 FPS, which is borderline playable but may stutter. The Medium preset at 52 FPS is the best option, as it provides a playable frame rate with reasonable visuals. The Low preset at 67 FPS is the most performant, but at this resolution, the visual downgrade is more noticeable. The Ultra preset at 28 FPS is not recommended, as it is below the playable threshold. For the best experience, the Medium preset at 1440p is the sweet spot, offering 92 FPS with a good balance of quality and performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F plays a supporting role in Evolve, with its six cores and twelve threads providing sufficient processing power for the game's logic and physics. The CPU has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, which is modest by current standards but adequate for a 2015 title. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is a key feature, as it allows for faster data access from the cores, which is beneficial in game scenarios where multiple threads are active.

The CPU's benchmark data shows a strong single-thread score of 2872, which is crucial for FPS games that often rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The multithread score is 19236, indicating that the CPU can handle multiple tasks simultaneously, but Evolve likely does not utilize all twelve threads efficiently. The CPU's percentile of 85 versus all CPUs means it outperforms 85% of processors, and its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, have average scores within 0.5% of the 5600F. This suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this system.

The measured FPS data confirms this. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 176 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit for frame generation in this game. However, as the resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. At 4K Ultra, the CPU has plenty of headroom, as the GPU can only manage 28 FPS. The CPU's memory support for DDR4 with dual-channel bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is sufficient for the game, and the 65W TDP ensures it does not throttle under load. The CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes allows for fast communication with the GPU, but in Evolve, the data shows that the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with frames, not to compute rendering tasks.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average at 176 FPS, followed by Medium at 137 FPS, High at 107 FPS, and Ultra at 74 FPS. The Medium preset has a min FPS of 116 and max FPS of 157, showing a 41 FPS spread, which is relatively stable. The High and Ultra presets do not have recorded min/max values, but the averages suggest that Ultra is playable but not ideal for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 118 FPS, Medium averages 92 FPS, High averages 72 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. The Medium preset has a min of 78 and max of 105, a spread of 27 FPS, which is tighter than at 1080p, indicating better frame pacing at this resolution. The High preset at 72 FPS is a significant drop from 1080p, showing the GPU's struggle with increased pixel count. The Ultra preset at 50 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less desirable.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 67 FPS, Medium averages 52 FPS, High averages 41 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. The Medium preset has a min of 44 and max of 60, a spread of 16 FPS, which is the narrowest of all measured points. This suggests that at 4K Medium, the GPU is consistently loaded, but the frame times are stable. The High and Ultra presets do not have min/max data, but the averages indicate that 4K is only viable at Low or Medium settings for a playable experience. The data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the GPU's performance degrades proportionally, and the CPU's role diminishes.