Downfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 163 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 58 | 93 | 113 | 139 |
| 1440p QHD | 93 | 150 | 182 | 223 |
| 1080p Full HD | 131 | 209 | 255 | 312 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data for Downfall with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combination produces 312 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 223 FPS, and at 4K Low the average falls to 139 FPS. This represents a 55% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the GPU is being progressively more stressed as pixel count rises.
At Medium settings, the scaling is similar but with a slightly different shape. The 1080p Medium result is 255 FPS, which falls to 182 FPS at 1440p, and then to 113 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is 38%, while the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 29%. This shows that the 4K resolution is disproportionately more demanding, which is typical for a horror title that relies on detailed environmental textures and lighting effects.
High settings tell a more telling story about the limiting component. At 1080p High, the combo delivers 209 FPS. At 1440p High, it drops to 150 FPS, and at 4K High, it reaches 93 FPS. The scaling here is almost perfectly linear with pixel count, suggesting that at High settings, the GPU is the primary bottleneck at all three resolutions. The 4K High result of 93 FPS is still highly playable, but the trend indicates that further increases in visual fidelity would push this below the 60 FPS threshold.
Ultra settings reveal the most dramatic scaling. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 131 FPS, which drops to 93 FPS at 1440p, and then to just 58 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is barely above the 60 FPS mark, and the 55% drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings is the steepest of any preset. This indicates that at Ultra, the combination of increased shadow quality, post-processing, and texture filtering places a heavy load on the GPU, and the 58 FPS result shows that 4K Ultra is only marginally viable for smooth gameplay.
The data suggests that the limiting component at lower resolutions and settings is the CPU, while at higher resolutions and settings, the GPU takes over as the constraint. At 1080p Low, the 312 FPS result is likely near the CPU's maximum frame delivery capability for this game. As settings increase, the GPU workload grows, and the frame rate becomes more dependent on the Radeon RX 9070 XT's capabilities. The 4K Ultra result of 58 FPS is a clear indication that the GPU is fully saturated at that configuration.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process node. Its base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The CPU has a 20 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The processor's TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a desktop part.
In Downfall, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the 312 FPS result is likely approaching the practical limit of what this CPU can deliver for this game's frame generation. The 10 cores and 10 threads are sufficient for the game's threading model, which appears to scale reasonably well with additional cores but does not require excessive thread counts. The single-thread performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655, is strong and contributes to the high frame rates at 1080p.
The boost clock of 4.90 GHz is particularly relevant for a horror game like Downfall, which often has sections with heavy scripted sequences and AI-driven events that can be sensitive to single-threaded performance. The CPU's ability to sustain high clocks on one or two cores likely helps maintain consistent frame pacing in these scenarios. The PassMark single-thread score of 4412 further supports the notion that this processor has ample single-core capability for the game's demands.
At higher resolutions, the CPU's role diminishes. The 4K Ultra result of 58 FPS is clearly GPU-bound, as the same CPU is capable of 131 FPS at 1080p Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a 55% reduction, which is consistent with a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU is not the bottleneck at 4K, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate drops in proportion to the pixel count increase.
The CPU's percentile rank of 85 among all tested processors indicates that it outperforms the majority of CPUs in general benchmarks. Its average benchmark score of 36938 places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, which scores 36945 with a deltaPct of 0. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 with a deltaPct of -0.5, meaning the Ultra 5 225 is essentially on par with these rivals in synthetic tests. In Downfall, this level of CPU performance is more than adequate, as the game appears to be GPU-bound at most settings above Low.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT ranks 910th out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the top 25% of all configurations. This rank reflects the strong overall performance of both components when paired together in this specific title. The GPU's percentile rank of 55 among all GPUs is lower than the CPU's rank of 85, which suggests that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing relative to their respective pools.
The combo's rank of 910 out of 3716 means it outperforms approximately 75% of all tested combinations. This is a solid result, though not exceptional, and it reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is a high-percentile part, while the GPU is more mid-range in its percentile standing. The combination works well because the CPU's strong single-threaded performance can feed the GPU effectively at lower resolutions, and the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and high memory bandwidth allow it to handle the game's textures at higher resolutions.
In the context of the game's genre, horror titles often benefit from high frame rates to maintain immersion and smooth camera movement. The rank of 910 suggests that this combo is well above average for Downfall, and the measured FPS data confirms that it can deliver smooth gameplay at most settings and resolutions. The only configuration that dips below 60 FPS is 4K Ultra at 58 FPS, which is a minor shortfall that could be addressed by adjusting a few settings.
The combo's performance relative to other tested combinations is consistent with the individual component benchmarks. The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic tests, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, are all within 0.5% of the Ultra 5 225's average score. This suggests that any of these CPUs paired with the same GPU would produce similar results in Downfall. The GPU's nearest rivals, which include older cards like the AMD Radeon HD 7770M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570, are not directly comparable in terms of modern gaming performance, but the deltaPct values show that the RX 9070 XT is at the top of its immediate benchmark tier.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Downfall?*
A: The highest measured average frame rate is 312 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, at 4K with High settings, the average frame rate is 93 FPS, and at Medium settings it is 113 FPS. However, at Ultra settings, the average drops to 58 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36938. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, scores 36945 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are essentially tied. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018 with a deltaPct of -0.2, slightly lower.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded at 1440p Medium settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the minimum frame rate is 155 FPS, with an average of 182 FPS and a maximum of 210 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p Low settings?
A: The data suggests the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p Low, as the 312 FPS result is likely near the maximum frame delivery capability of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 for this game.
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations in this game?
A: The combo ranks 910th out of 3716 total combinations tested in Downfall, placing it in the top 25% of all configurations.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is a 16 GB GDDR6 graphics card based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process node. It features a boost clock of 2970 MHz and a game clock of 2400 MHz, with a memory bus width of 256 bit and memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, along with 64 ray tracing cores. Its FP32 performance is 48.66 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.
In Downfall, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p Low, the 312 FPS result is more CPU-limited, but the GPU is still working to render the frame. As settings increase to Medium and High, the GPU's workload grows, and the frame rates at 1080p drop to 255 FPS and 209 FPS respectively. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for this game, even at 4K Ultra, where texture memory demands are highest.
The RX 9070 XT's memory bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s is particularly relevant for a horror game that uses high-resolution textures to create atmosphere. The 256-bit memory bus and GDDR6 memory provide ample bandwidth for the game's data streaming. The GPU's boost clock of 2970 MHz allows it to maintain high performance under load, which is evident in the 4K High result of 93 FPS.
The GPU's performance in Downfall can be contextualized by its benchmark scores. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7260 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for this game. The PassMark G3D score of 26795 places it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs, suggesting it is a mid-to-upper-tier card. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 65879 shows that the GPU handles low-level APIs well, which can translate to better performance in games that use Vulkan, though Downfall's API usage is not specified in the data.
The GPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are notably older cards, such as the AMD Radeon HD 7770M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570. However, the deltaPct values of 0.1% and 0.2% indicate that the RX 9070 XT is just ahead of these cards in average benchmark score, which is surprising given the generational gap. This suggests that the benchmark averaging may be skewed by the RX 9070 XT's lower percentile rank, but in Downfall, the GPU's actual performance is strong, as evidenced by the measured FPS.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, all settings presets deliver playable frame rates. The Low preset achieves 312 FPS, Medium reaches 255 FPS, High provides 209 FPS, and Ultra still manages 131 FPS. For players with 1080p displays, the High preset at 209 FPS offers a good balance between visual quality and performance, while Ultra at 131 FPS is also viable for those who prioritize image quality.
At 1440p, the recommendation shifts. The Low preset delivers 223 FPS, Medium provides 182 FPS, High reaches 150 FPS, and Ultra drops to 93 FPS. All of these are above 60 FPS, making any preset playable. However, the Medium preset at 182 FPS with a minimum of 155 FPS provides a smooth experience with better visual fidelity than Low. The High preset at 150 FPS is also excellent, and the Ultra preset at 93 FPS is still well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a viable choice for those with high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors.
At 4K, the choices are more constrained. The Low preset achieves 139 FPS, Medium reaches 113 FPS, High provides 93 FPS, and Ultra falls to 58 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only configuration that dips below 60 FPS, and the 58 FPS average may result in occasional frame pacing issues. For 4K gaming, the High preset at 93 FPS is the best recommendation, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium while maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 113 FPS is also a strong choice for those who want extra headroom for demanding scenes.
The data shows that the Medium preset at 1440p is the "sweet spot" for this combo, delivering 182 FPS with a minimum of 155 FPS and a maximum of 210 FPS. This configuration balances visual quality with high frame rates, ensuring smooth gameplay even in intense horror sequences. For 4K users, the High preset at 93 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured results are as follows: Low settings produce an average of 312 FPS, Medium settings produce an average of 255 FPS with a minimum of 217 FPS and a maximum of 294 FPS, High settings produce an average of 209 FPS, and Ultra settings produce an average of 131 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 181 FPS, which is the largest absolute difference of any resolution.
At 2560x1440, the results show a similar pattern with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 223 FPS, Medium settings average 182 FPS with a minimum of 155 FPS and a maximum of 210 FPS, High settings average 150 FPS, and Ultra settings average 93 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 130 FPS, which is a smaller absolute drop than at 1080p but a similar percentage reduction.
At 3840x2160, the results are the most demanding. Low settings average 139 FPS, Medium settings average 113 FPS with a minimum of 96 FPS and a maximum of 131 FPS, High settings average 93 FPS, and Ultra settings average 58 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 81 FPS, and the Ultra preset is the only configuration across all resolutions and settings that falls below 60 FPS.
The Medium settings preset is the only one that provides minimum and maximum frame rate data across all three resolutions. At 1080p, the minimum is 217 FPS and the maximum is 294 FPS. At 1440p, the minimum is 155 FPS and the maximum is 210 FPS. At 4K, the minimum is 96 FPS and the maximum is 131 FPS. These ranges show that the frame rate variation is consistent across resolutions, with the minimum typically being around 73-75% of the average, indicating stable performance without severe frame drops.
The complete dataset shows that this combo can handle Downfall at high frame rates across most configurations. The only sub-60 FPS result is 4K Ultra at 58 FPS, which is a minor shortfall. The data confirms that the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT form a capable pairing for this horror title, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint only at the most demanding settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 225
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 139.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 113.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 93.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 58.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 223.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 182.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 150.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 93.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 312.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 255.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 209.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 131.0 |
Downfall with iUltra 5 225 + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 225 + RX 9070 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.