Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
49
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 49 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 18 28 34 42
1440p QHD 28 45 55 67
1080p Full HD 39 63 77 94

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 42
3840x2160 Medium 34
3840x2160 High 28
3840x2160 Ultra 18
2560x1440 Low 67
2560x1440 Medium 55
2560x1440 High 45
2560x1440 Ultra 28
1920x1080 Low 94
1920x1080 Medium 77
1920x1080 High 63
1920x1080 Ultra 39

Downfall with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + AMD Radeon 890M, In-Depth Analysis

Downfall, a 2016 horror title, places this particular mobile platform—the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H paired with the AMD Radeon 890M—in a challenging position. The measured frame rates across the board indicate that this integrated-graphics configuration is best suited for lower resolutions and medium settings, where it can deliver a playable experience, while higher presets and 4K resolutions push it beyond its limits.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 94 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. The Medium preset is also highly viable, delivering 77 FPS on average with a minimum of 66 FPS, ensuring a stable experience above common 60 FPS thresholds. The High preset drops to an average of 63 FPS, which is still playable but offers less headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset, however, falls to 39 FPS, which is noticeably less fluid.

At 2560x1440, the situation tightens. The Low preset maintains a solid 67 FPS average, but the Medium preset drops to 55 FPS with a minimum of 47 FPS. While playable, this level of performance suggests occasional dips that could be noticeable in a horror game where atmosphere and pacing are critical. The High preset at 45 FPS and the Ultra preset at 28 FPS become increasingly difficult to recommend for a consistently smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, all presets struggle. The Low preset is the only one that approaches playability with an average of 42 FPS. The Medium preset averages 34 FPS with a minimum of 29 FPS, and the High preset averages 28 FPS. The Ultra preset is effectively not viable, with an average of just 18 FPS.

Based on this data, the best experience is achieved at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset. This configuration provides an average of 77 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, while the minimum of 66 FPS ensures that frame drops are minimal. This offers a significant improvement in visual quality over the Low preset (94 FPS) without sacrificing the fluidity essential for a tense horror game. For users who prioritize maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 1080p is the fallback. At higher resolutions, the Low preset is the only reasonable option for maintaining a semblance of performance, but the data suggests that 1440p and 4K are beyond this combo's comfortable sweet spot.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor from the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W. The processor's cache configuration includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU is a mobile part, and its performance is competitive with desktop processors from a few generations ago, as indicated by its benchmark scores.

In synthetic testing, the Core Ultra 5 125H achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12804.5 and a single-core score of 1647.5. Its average benchmark score of 27507 places it in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The data shows it is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, with a negligible 0.1% difference in average score. It also trades blows with the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, both of which are within 0.3% of its score. This indicates that the CPU has ample processing power for gaming workloads.

For a game like Downfall, which is a horror title, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI. The high multi-threaded performance of the Core Ultra 5 125H, evidenced by a Passmark multi-thread score of 21100, ensures that it is unlikely to be the bottleneck in most scenarios. The strong single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3399, is also crucial for maintaining high frame rates in games that rely heavily on a single core. In this combo, the CPU’s capabilities are more than sufficient to feed the integrated GPU, meaning the performance limits observed in the measured FPS are almost entirely due to the graphics solution, not the processor.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. The GPU has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with a TDP of 15 W. A key characteristic is its memory configuration, which is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This makes its memory bandwidth "System Dependent," a critical factor for performance.

The Radeon 890M's benchmark scores show it is a mid-range performer for an iGPU. It achieves a Passmark G3D score of 8076, placing it in the 45th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon Vega 8, which has a nearly identical average score (9221 vs. 9210 for the 890M), a 0.1% difference. It also performs similarly to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and GTX 465, with the 890M trailing them by 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. This positions the 890M as a capable integrated solution, but one that is fundamentally limited by its shared memory architecture and lack of dedicated VRAM.

In Downfall, the GPU is the primary limiting factor. The measured frame rates show a clear dependence on resolution and settings. The GPU's compute power, measured at 5.939 TFLOPS, is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions and detail levels. The reliance on system memory for graphics also impacts performance, as the shared memory bandwidth can become a bottleneck. The data shows that the GPU can handle 1080p Low at 94 FPS, but this drops to 39 FPS at 1080p Ultra. This pattern is consistent with a GPU that is being pushed beyond its memory bandwidth and processing limits as graphical load increases.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and AMD Radeon 890M ranks 2746 out of 2928 combos for Downfall. This places it in the bottom 6% of all tested systems, indicating that it is a low-performing configuration for this specific game. The combo rank is a holistic measure that considers the combined capabilities of the CPU and GPU in the context of this title.

The low rank is not surprising given the GPU's position. While the CPU is a strong performer in the 79th percentile for all CPUs, the GPU is in the 45th percentile. When paired together for a graphically demanding task like gaming, the weaker component dictates the overall experience. The Radeon 890M's performance is the anchor, pulling the combined rank down significantly. The data suggests that this combo is far better suited for general productivity or light gaming than for running a title like Downfall at high settings. The high rank number (2746) signals that users should expect significant compromises in visual fidelity and resolution to achieve playable frame rates, as confirmed by the measured FPS data.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo scales with resolution. At the Low preset, the average frame rate drops from 94 FPS at 1080p to 67 FPS at 1440p, a 28.7% decrease. Moving further to 4K, the average drops to 42 FPS, a 55.3% decrease from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

At the Medium preset, the scaling is similar. The average FPS drops from 77 at 1080p to 55 at 1440p (a 28.6% decrease) and then to 34 at 4K (a 55.8% decrease from 1080p). The consistent percentage drops across different presets show that the performance is heavily dependent on the pixel count. The GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being saturated as the resolution increases.

This behavior is typical of a system where the GPU is the limiting factor. A CPU-bound system would show a smaller performance drop when scaling resolution, as the CPU's workload would remain relatively constant. Here, the significant frame rate loss at higher resolutions confirms that the AMD Radeon 890M, with its shared memory and limited processing power, is struggling to keep up with the increased pixel throughput. The data suggests that 1080p is the intended resolution for this combo, and any attempt to play at higher resolutions will result in a substantially compromised experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings to play Downfall with this hardware?

A: The data indicates that 1920x1080 with the Medium preset offers the best balance, providing an average of 77 FPS and a minimum of 66 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay without the visual compromises of the Low preset.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Downfall?

A: No. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset only manages an average of 42 FPS. The Ultra preset is unplayable at just 18 FPS. The GPU is not powerful enough for a smooth 4K experience.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 890M compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Vega 8, with a 0.1% difference. It also performs similarly to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, which scores 0.7% higher.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H CPU powerful enough for this game?

A: Yes. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27507 is within 0.3% of processors like the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X. Its performance is more than adequate, and the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this setup.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 4K at the High preset?

A: The average frame rate drops from 63 FPS at 1080p to 28 FPS at 4K, representing a 55.6% decrease. This significant drop highlights the GPU's inability to handle higher resolutions.

Q: Does the Radeon 890M have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's main memory. This makes its memory bandwidth "System Dependent" and is a key factor in its performance limitations at higher resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Cores / Threads 14 / 18
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 28W
Socket Intel BGA 2049
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon 890M

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2900 MHz MHz
TDP 15 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + AMD Radeon 890M in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 42.0
3840x2160 Medium 34.0
3840x2160 High 28.0
3840x2160 Ultra 18.0
2560x1440 Low 67.0
2560x1440 Medium 55.0
2560x1440 High 45.0
2560x1440 Ultra 28.0
1920x1080 Low 94.0
1920x1080 Medium 77.0
1920x1080 High 63.0
1920x1080 Ultra 39.0

Downfall with iUltra 5 125H + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Other Games with iUltra 5 125H + 890M

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.