Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 110 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 63 | 75 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 66 | 101 | 121 | 151 |
| 1080p Full HD | 88 | 140 | 174 | 210 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER produces a compelling dataset for Downfall, a 2016 Horror title. The measured frames per second across resolutions and settings reveal a system that is highly capable at 1080p but begins to show its limitations as pixel count climbs. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the hardware's role, and answers key questions about the combo's behavior in this specific game.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, indicating that the rendering load scales heavily with pixel count, a typical characteristic for a GPU-bound scenario. At Ultra settings, the average frame rate falls from 87.6 at 1920x1080 to 65.7 at 2560x1440, and finally to 40.8 at 3840x2160. This represents a 53% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K at the highest preset, demonstrating that the RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. The data suggests that 4K Ultra is not a viable target for smooth gameplay, as the average dips below 60 FPS.
However, the scaling behavior is not uniform across all presets. When using the Low preset, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 210.4 to 95.1 average FPS, a 55% reduction. Interestingly, the absolute FPS at 4K Low (95.1) is still higher than the 1080p Ultra average (87.6). This implies that while the GPU is stressed by resolution, the CPU headroom provided by the i5-12600KF is sufficient to push the frame rate high even at 4K when graphical settings are lowered. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p is 122.8 FPS, but at 4K, this gap narrows to 54.3 FPS, further confirming that the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the bottleneck as resolution increases, reducing the impact of the CPU's high frame rate potential.
How This Combo Ranks
In the grand scheme of tested combinations, this pairing sits at rank 1043 out of 1741 combos for Downfall. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, which is a curious result given the hardware's individual specifications. The i5-12600KF is a high-performance desktop processor, and the RTX 2070 SUPER is a solid 1440p-class GPU, yet the combo's in-game rank suggests that many other pairings deliver higher average frame rates. This could be due to the game's age and its specific engine, which might not fully utilize the CPU's modern architecture or the GPU's Turing features.
The combo's rank is likely dragged down by the GPU's performance at 4K, where the average FPS at Ultra settings (40.8) is nearly unplayable. The percentile data for the individual components supports this: the CPU sits in the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 65th percentile among all GPUs. This indicates an imbalance; the CPU is a top-tier performer relative to its peers, but the GPU is more mid-range. In Downfall, this means the RTX 2070 SUPER is the bottleneck for achieving high frame rates, especially at higher resolutions, preventing the combo from ranking higher despite the capable processor.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12600KF brings substantial processing power to this pairing, with 10 cores and 16 threads running at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Its benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23444 and a single-core score of 3309. In the context of Downfall, a Horror game that likely relies on single-thread performance for game logic, the high boost clock and strong single-core scores are beneficial. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo can reach an average of 210.4 FPS on Low settings, which is far beyond typical monitor refresh rates, indicating that the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution.
The CPU's role becomes clearer when examining the frame rate drops at higher resolutions. At 4K Low, the average is 95.1, which is still very high. The fact that the CPU can feed the GPU enough data to maintain nearly 100 FPS at 4K on low settings suggests that its processing power is more than adequate for this title. The i5-12600KF's nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, has a nearly identical average benchmark score (27829 vs 27827), indicating that the 12600KF is performing at the level of a previous-generation flagship. Its architecture, Alder Lake, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for system builders. The CPU's performance is a strong asset, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's limits when the resolution is pushed high.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a high frame rate in Downfall?*
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 yields the highest frame rates across all settings, with an average of 210.4 FPS on Low and 140.4 FPS on High. This resolution allows the combo to exceed 60 FPS even at the demanding Ultra preset, making it the safest choice for smooth gameplay.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Downfall?*
A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At 3840x2160, the average FPS is 95.1 on Low and 74.9 on Medium. The Ultra preset at 4K produces an average of 40.8 FPS, which is below the standard 60 FPS target for most players.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest rival?
A: The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an average benchmark score of 27827, which is essentially identical to the Intel Core i9-10900K's score of 27829, showing a deltaPct of 0. This means the two processors offer comparable overall performance.
*Q: Is the GPU or the CPU more likely to limit performance in Downfall?*
A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary limiter. At 4K, the frame rate drops significantly even at High settings (62.8 FPS), while the CPU is capable of supporting much higher frame rates, as seen at 1080p Low (210.4 FPS).
Q: What is the frame rate difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 100.9 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 65.7 FPS. This is a 35.2 FPS difference, suggesting that the Ultra preset imposes a significant additional load on the GPU.
*Q: Based on the data, is this a balanced combo for Downfall?*
A: The combo is balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can achieve high frame rates. However, for 4K, the GPU's limitations are exposed, creating an imbalance where the CPU's power is underutilized.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the other half of this pairing, and its specifications paint a picture of a capable but not top-tier graphics card. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU is based on the Turing architecture with a boost clock of 1770 MHz and a FP32 performance of 9.062 TFLOPS. These specs allow it to perform well at 1080p and 1440p, but the data shows it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra, averaging just 40.8 FPS. Its passmark G3D score of 18169 and its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirm that it is a mid-range performer in the current landscape.
The GPU's role in Downfall is to handle the visual rendering, and the scaling data shows that it is the deciding factor for frame rates. At 1440p High, the combo manages 100.9 FPS, which is excellent. However, moving to 4K High drops the average to 62.8 FPS, a reduction of 38.1 FPS. This steep decline is a direct result of the GPU's memory bandwidth and processing power being saturated by the higher pixel count. The RTX 2070 SUPER’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A400, has a similar average benchmark score (22307 vs 22206), but the gaming performance in Downfall is what matters here. The data shows that for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 4K, the settings must be lowered to High or below, as the Ultra preset falls critically short.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 appears to be the sweet spot. It delivers an average of 120.9 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target and still offers a good level of visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the High preset offers an excellent 140.4 FPS, making it the recommended choice for players with high refresh rate monitors who want to maximize smoothness without sacrificing too much detail. The Ultra preset at 1080p is also viable at 87.6 FPS, but the jump to Ultra at 1440p (65.7 FPS) is risky for those who prefer a strict 60 FPS lock, as any minor fluctuation could cause a noticeable stutter.
For 4K gaming, the data suggests that the Low preset, with an average of 95.1 FPS, is the only reliable option for a high frame rate experience. Medium at 4K (74.9 FPS) is playable, but it does not leave much headroom. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as the 40.8 FPS average will be a poor experience in a Horror title, where smooth pacing is crucial for atmosphere. Therefore, the recommendation is to target 1440p Medium or 1080p High for the best overall experience, and to reserve 4K for Low or Medium settings if resolution is the top priority.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a clear matrix of performance across twelve combinations of resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high: Low averages 210.4, Medium averages 173.8, High averages 140.4, and Ultra averages 87.6. This shows a linear scaling where each step up in settings costs roughly 30-50 FPS. At 2560x1440, the averages are 150.9 for Low, 120.9 for Medium, 100.9 for High, and 65.7 for Ultra. The drop from Medium to Ultra at this resolution is 55.2 FPS, which is a significant performance penalty for the highest visual details.
At 3840x2160, the performance curve becomes steeply declining. The Low preset averages 95.1, Medium drops to 74.9, High falls to 62.8, and Ultra plummets to 40.8. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 54.3 FPS, but the relative impact is much larger because the baseline is lower. Comparing across resolutions, the 1080p Ultra average of 87.6 is higher than the 4K High average of 62.8, highlighting how resolution is the dominant factor. The data confirms that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being possible only at reduced settings. The performance at 1440p High (100.9 FPS) and 1080p High (140.4 FPS) are the standout figures, offering excellent experiences for most users.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12600KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 95.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 74.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 40.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 150.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 120.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 100.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 65.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 210.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 173.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 140.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 87.6 |
Downfall with ii5-12600KF + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RTX 2070 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12600KF + RTX 2070 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.