Downfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 126 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 72 | 87 | 107 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 115 | 140 | 171 |
| 1080p Full HD | 101 | 161 | 196 | 240 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a performance profile in Downfall that is heavily dictated by resolution, with the CPU’s substantial thread count and the GPU’s mid-range positioning creating a predictable bottleneck shift. At 1080p, the combination is capable of very high frame rates, while 4K Ultra presents a significant challenge, underscoring the GPU as the limiting factor at higher fidelity settings.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent progression as resolution increases, but the magnitude of the performance drop varies significantly by settings preset. At Low settings, the transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 results in a drop from 240 FPS to 171 FPS, a 29% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 3840x2160 at Low yields 107 FPS, a further 37% decrease from the 1440p result. This indicates that even at the lowest graphical load, the rendering pipeline is still sensitive to pixel count, though the absolute numbers remain high.
For Medium settings, the scaling is similar in pattern: 196 FPS at 1080p, 140 FPS at 1440p (a 29% drop), and 87 FPS at 4K (a 38% drop from 1440p). The High preset shows a slightly different curve, with 161 FPS at 1080p, 115 FPS at 1440p (a 29% drop), and 72 FPS at 4K (a 37% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across Low, Medium, and High suggests that the game’s rendering load scales relatively linearly with resolution, and the GPU is the primary component responding to this change.
The Ultra preset, however, tells a different story. At 1080p Ultra, the system produces 101 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, this falls to 72 FPS (a 29% drop). At 4K Ultra, the average FPS plummets to 45, which is a 37.5% drop from the 1440p Ultra result. This 45 FPS figure is notably below the 60 FPS threshold often considered smooth for action-oriented gameplay, indicating that the combination is not well-suited for maximum fidelity at 4K. The data suggests that the RX 7700’s compute and memory bandwidth are saturated by the combination of high resolution and Ultra settings, making the GPU the definitive limiting component in this scenario.
Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU’s influence becomes more apparent. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, ensures that the game is never starved for processing power, allowing the RX 7700 to reach its peak output. The fact that 1080p Low hits 240 FPS while 1080p Medium reaches 196 FPS shows that the GPU is still the primary driver of performance, but the CPU’s headroom prevents any frame drops due to processing bottlenecks. The scaling data indicates that for users targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, this combo is well-balanced, but for 4K Ultra, the GPU becomes a clear performance ceiling.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 161 FPS.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 45, which is the lowest measured result across all tested configurations.
Q: Is there a significant difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?
A: Yes, the data shows an average of 140 FPS for Medium settings and 115 FPS for High settings at 2560x1440, a difference of 25 FPS.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The highest average FPS is 240, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded for the 4K Medium preset?
A: For 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 74 and the maximum FPS is 100, with an average of 87 FPS.
Q: How does the performance at 1440p Low compare to 1080p High?
A: The 1440p Low preset delivers an average of 171 FPS, which is 10 FPS higher than the 1080p High preset’s 161 FPS, indicating that lowering settings has a more significant impact than reducing resolution.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p display, the High preset at 161 FPS offers a strong balance between visual fidelity and performance, comfortably exceeding 144 Hz refresh rates. Pushing to Ultra at 1080p drops the average to 101 FPS, which is still playable but sacrifices some smoothness for marginal graphical gains. For those prioritizing maximum frame rates on a 1080p 240 Hz monitor, the Low preset at 240 FPS is the only configuration that fully saturates such a display, while Medium at 196 FPS also provides a very high refresh experience.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset stands out as the sweet spot, delivering an average of 140 FPS with a minimum of 119 FPS, ensuring consistent performance above 100 FPS. The High preset at 115 FPS is also viable for 144 Hz displays, but the Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin above the refresh rate threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p, with its 72 FPS average, is less desirable for competitive play but remains a reasonable choice for slower-paced, visually demanding scenarios.
For 4K resolution, the data suggests that Ultra settings are not a viable option, as the 45 FPS average is too low for a smooth experience. The High preset at 72 FPS is marginally better, but still below the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 87 FPS is the recommended choice for 4K, providing a playable experience with average frame rates above 60 FPS. The Low preset at 107 FPS offers the best performance at 4K, but requires significant compromises in visual quality. The data indicates that for 4K, users should prioritize Medium settings to balance visual quality and playability.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Downfall, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 holds a combo rank of 1735 out of 3716 total combos. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, indicating a competent, though not top-tier, performance level. The percentile position suggests that while the CPU is a high-end part, the GPU’s mid-range standing prevents the combo from reaching the upper echelons of the ranking.
The ranking reflects the balance of the two components. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a flagship processor, but its immense processing power is not fully utilized in a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. The RX 7700, while capable, limits the overall potential of the system, particularly in 4K Ultra settings where the average FPS falls to 45. The combo’s rank is a direct consequence of this GPU bottleneck, as many other systems with lower-tier CPUs but higher-tier GPUs would outperform it in this specific game.
Compared to the CPU’s individual standing, where it ranks in the 95th percentile and sits within 0.4% of its nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, AMD EPYC 8224P, Intel Core Ultra 9 285), the combo’s rank is significantly lower. This disparity highlights how the GPU component drags down the overall system performance in Downfall. The GPU itself ranks in the 58th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R9 370X at a 0.1% delta, showing that it performs as expected for its class. The combo rank of 1735 is a synthesis of these two positions, resulting in a mid-pack finish.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. Its substantial L3 cache of 128 MB is a key feature, though the fact pack does not specify if this is the 3D V-Cache variant. The CPU’s benchmark results are exceptionally strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42018 and a single-core score of 2259, demonstrating its capability across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.
In Downfall, the CPU’s role appears to be that of a stable foundation that rarely becomes the limiting factor. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 240 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, it reaches 196 FPS. These high frame rates suggest that the CPU can feed the GPU with enough data to maintain these levels. The 3DMark benchmarks further illustrate the CPU’s scaling: a score of 2549 with 2 threads, 4963 with 4 threads, 9259 with 8 threads, and 16374 with 16 threads, culminating in 17184 at max threads. This scaling efficiency means the game can utilize the CPU’s resources effectively, but the performance ceiling is not determined by the CPU in this configuration.
The data indicates that the CPU’s massive thread count is not a bottleneck at any resolution tested. Even at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS is 45, the limiting factor is the GPU’s rendering throughput, not the CPU’s ability to issue draw calls or process game logic. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 3064 and Passmark single-thread score of 4737, ensures that the game’s primary thread is well-served. In this context, the CPU provides ample headroom, and the measured performance is more indicative of the GPU’s capabilities.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are as follows: Low settings produce 240 FPS, Medium settings produce 196 FPS with a minimum of 167 FPS and a maximum of 226 FPS, High settings produce 161 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 101 FPS. This shows a clear step-down as settings increase, with the gap between Medium and High being 35 FPS and between High and Ultra being 60 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the average FPS values decrease across all settings: Low yields 171 FPS, Medium yields 140 FPS with a minimum of 119 FPS and a maximum of 161 FPS, High yields 115 FPS, and Ultra yields 72 FPS. The relative performance gap between Medium and High at 1440p is 25 FPS, which is smaller than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is beginning to feel the load of the higher resolution.
At 3840x2160, the average FPS values are the lowest: Low produces 107 FPS, Medium produces 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS, High produces 72 FPS, and Ultra produces 45 FPS. The transition from High to Ultra at 4K is particularly steep, with a 27 FPS drop, highlighting the significant cost of the Ultra preset at this resolution. The data also shows that the minimum FPS values for Medium settings are 167 FPS at 1080p, 119 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K, demonstrating that frame pacing remains relatively consistent within each resolution, though the floor drops proportionally with the average.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. Its core clocks are a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, with a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is rated at 25.18 TFLOPS.
The GPU’s performance in Downfall is the primary determinant of the system’s frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows that the GPU’s capabilities are strained at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 45. This is a clear indication that the GPU’s compute units and memory bandwidth are insufficient for the demands of the game at maximum fidelity and resolution. The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect its mid-range position, with a Passmark G3D score of 20974 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs.
The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a notable asset, as it is unlikely to be a limiting factor in this game, even at 4K with Ultra textures. However, the raw processing power is the bottleneck. The data indicates that the GPU is performing as expected for its class, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R9 370X at a 0.1% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at a -1.7% delta. In Downfall, the RX 7700’s role is clear: it provides solid 1080p and 1440p performance, but its mid-range nature limits the system to sub-60 FPS at 4K Ultra, making it the definitive component that dictates the upper bound of the gaming experience.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
AMD Radeon RX 7700
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 107.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 87.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 45.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 171.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 140.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 72.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 240.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 196.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 161.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 101.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 7700 + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RX 7700
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.