Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 279 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 100 | 129 | 173 | 208 |
| 1440p QHD | 179 | 231 | 309 | 373 |
| 1080p Full HD | 271 | 349 | 468 | 563 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers exceptional performance in Counter-Strike 2, positioning this combination in the top 21% of all tested configurations. The data shows a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-limited at lower resolutions, with the CPU becoming a more significant factor only as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the measured frame rates, scaling behavior, and component roles to provide a clear verdict on what this combo offers.
Resolution Scaling
The measured data reveals a predictable and steep drop in performance as resolution scales from 1080p to 4K, a pattern consistent with a system that is heavily GPU-bound at lower settings. At the "Low" preset, the average frame rate falls from 563 FPS at 1920x1080 to 373 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 190 FPS (34%). Moving from 1440p to 4K at the same settings, the average drops further to 208 FPS, representing another 165 FPS decline (44%). This indicates that while the RTX 5070 is immensely powerful, the sheer pixel count at 4K begins to tax it even on the lowest settings.
The scaling pattern becomes more moderate at higher graphical presets, which is typical for a game like Counter-Strike 2 where the visual workload increases relative to the CPU overhead. For the "High" preset, the average FPS moves from 349 at 1080p, to 231 at 1440p, and finally to 129 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is 63%, which is slightly less steep than the 63% drop seen on Low settings, suggesting that the additional pixel shading work at 4K is starting to equalize the load between the CPU and GPU.
The "Ultra" preset shows the most dramatic scaling, with averages of 271 FPS at 1080p, 179 FPS at 1440p, and 100 FPS at 4K. This represents a 63% reduction from 1080p to 4K, mirroring the High preset's scaling. The fact that the Ultra preset at 4K yields exactly 100 FPS average, a round number that suggests a potential frame pacing limit or V-Sync setting, is noteworthy, but the data confirms that this is the most demanding configuration tested.
The "Medium" preset provides the only complete dataset with min, max, and average FPS values. At 1080p, the average is 468 FPS with a minimum of 397 and a maximum of 538. At 1440p, these figures shift to an average of 309 FPS, with a minimum of 263 and a maximum of 356. At 4K, the average falls to 173 FPS, with a minimum of 147 and a maximum of 199. The variance between minimum and maximum FPS is relatively consistent across resolutions, around 141-142 FPS, suggesting that the frame time consistency is stable even as the average drops.
The interpretation of this scaling data is clear: at 1080p and 1440p, the system is almost entirely GPU-limited, as evidenced by the massive frame rates that far exceed what any competitive player would need. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, has enough headroom to feed the RTX 5070 at these resolutions. At 4K, the scaling becomes more linear with resolution, indicating that the GPU is now the primary bottleneck, but the CPU is no longer a limiting factor either. The 4K results, while lower, are still highly playable, with even the Ultra preset maintaining a 100 FPS average.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. In the context of Counter-Strike 2, which is known to be sensitive to single-threaded performance, the CPU's single-core scores are particularly relevant. The data shows a PassMark single-thread score of 3481 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1964, which are strong figures that allow the CPU to handle the game's game logic and rendering commands without bottlenecking the GPU.
The CPU's multi-threaded performance, while not as critical for this title, is still robust. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 and a PassMark multithread score of 19433 indicate that the processor can handle background tasks and streaming without impacting frame rates. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 and the max-thread score of 5912 show that the CPU scales well with additional threads, though the game itself may not utilize all 12 threads fully.
Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is not the limiting component in this pairing for most scenarios. At 1080p Low, the average FPS of 563 suggests that the GPU is being fed with more frames than it can render, but the CPU is still providing the necessary data. At 4K Ultra, the 100 FPS average is more likely a GPU limit, as the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to maintain high frame rates even in complex scenes. The CPU's percentile rank of 73 against all CPUs confirms that it is a solid mid-range part, but its nearest rivals in average benchmark score, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0% delta) and the Intel Core 3 201E (-0.1% delta), show that it is not a top-tier processor. However, for Counter-Strike 2, the data suggests that the i5-12400F provides ample performance to avoid being a bottleneck.
The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache are adequate for the game's data access patterns. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus, offers flexibility, but the measured FPS data does not differentiate between memory typesikuha. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz is the key specification for gaming, as the CPU will likely stay in this boost state during gameplay, providing the necessary single-threaded speed to drive high frame rates.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Core i5-12400F bottleneck the RTX 5070 in Counter-Strike 2?
A: No, the measured data shows that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 563 FPS, and at 1080p High it reaches 349 FPS. These figures indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU sufficiently at all tested resolutions, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor as resolution and settings increase.
Q: What is the best resolution for competitive play with this combo?
A: For maximum frame rates, 1920x1080 with Low settings yields 563 FPS average. However, the data shows that even at 2560x1440 with High settings, the system maintains 231 FPS average, which is well above the refresh rate of most high-end monitors, making 1440p a viable choice for both visual quality and performance.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 compare to its nearest rivals in raw benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, has a score of 40318 (0.1% delta), while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063 (0.8% delta). The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568 (2% delta), showing the RTX 5070 is slightly ahead.
Q: What are the performance differences between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves an average of 208 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 100 FPS. The High preset falls between these at 129 FPS. This represents a 108 FPS difference between Low and Ultra, indicating that the Ultra preset demands significantly more GPU resources.
Q: Is the i5-12400F's single-thread performance sufficient for this game?
A: Yes, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3481 and Geekbench single-core score of 1964 are strong indicators of capable performance. The measured FPS results, particularly the 563 FPS at 1080p Low, confirm that the CPU's single-thread speed is more than adequate for Counter-Strike 2.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 766th out of 3719 tested combinations, placing it in the top 20.6% of all systems. This high ranking is driven by the synergy between the i5-12400F's strong single-thread performance and the RTX 5070's high raw GPU power.
How This Combo Ranks
The combined rank for this Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 pairing in Counter-Strike 2 is 766 out of 3719 tested combos. This places the system in the top 21% of all configurations, a strong result that underscores the balance between the CPU and GPU. The rank is particularly impressive given that the CPU is a mid-range part, indicating that the RTX 5070's raw power is the primary driver of this high placement.
The high rank is supported by the CPU's benchmark percentile of 73 against all CPUs)Skip. The GPU's percentile of 82 against all GPUs is even higher, showing that the graphics card is a top-tier performer. The combination of a top-quartile GPU with a solid mid-range CPU results in a system that excels in a CPU-bound game like Counter-Strike 2, where the GPU can be fully utilized without being held back.
The ranking also reflects the data's measured nature, as the FPS figures are directly recorded rather than estimated. This adds credibility to the rank, as it is based on actual performance rather than theoretical calculations. The fact that the combo achieves 563 FPS at 1080p Low and 349 FPS at 1080p High confirms the GPU's dominance, but the CPU's ability to keep up at these high frame rates is what allows the system to rank so highly.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy for settings presets, and the recommendation depends on the user's performance target. For players prioritizing maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 1920x1080 offers the highest average FPS at 563. However, this comes at the cost of visual fidelity. The Medium preset at the same resolution yields 468 FPS, a 17% reduction but with improved visuals. Given that even the Ultra preset at 1080p achieves 271 FPS, there is no scenario where the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates.
For a balanced experience, the High preset at 2560x1440 is the most compelling option. It delivers 231 FPS average, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor, and provides a significant visual upgrade over Low settings. The data shows that the step from High to Ultra at 1440p costs 52 FPS (from 231 to 179), a 22% reduction that may not be worth the visual gains for most users.
At 4K, the recommendation is more nuanced. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 offers 173 FPS average, which is still excellent for 4K gaming. The High preset drops to 129 FPS, while Ultra falls to 100 FPS. For a 60Hz 4K display, all presets are playable, but for higher refresh rates, Medium is the sweet spot. The Low preset at 4K achieves 208 FPS, but the visual degradation is severe. The data suggests that Medium at 4K provides the best balance of performance and image quality, with 173 FPS average and a minimum of 147 FPS ensuring no significant drops.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table summarizes the average FPS at each resolution and settings preset, with min/max values where available:
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|
| 1920x1080 | Low | 563 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 468 | 397 | 538 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 349 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 271 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 373 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 309 | 263 | 356 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 231 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 179 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 208 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 173 | 147 | 199 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 129 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 100 | - | - |
The data reveals a consistent pattern across all presets: the difference between Low and Medium at each resolution is approximately 17-19% (e.g., 563 to 468 at 1080p, 373 to 309 at 1440p, 208 to 173 at 4K). The jump from Medium to High is more significant, with a 25-34% reduction in average FPS depending on resolution. The step from High to Ultra is another 22-24% reduction, showing that the Ultra preset is the most demanding.
At 1080p, the system is clearly GPU-limited even at Ultra, with 271 FPS showing that the RTX 5070 has headroom to spare. The 1440p results show a similar trend, with even Ultra maintaining 179 FPS. At 4K, the system becomes more balanced, with the GPU being the primary bottleneck. The Medium preset at 4K offers a min FPS of 147, which is above the 144Hz refresh rate of many gaming monitors, making it the recommended preset for 4K high-refresh displays.
The maximum FPS values for Medium settings show that the system can spike well above the average, with 538 FPS at 1080p and 356 FPS at 1440p. These spikes indicate that the system has significant computational headroom, and the minimum FPS values are consistently within 15% of the average, showing good frame time consistency. Overall, the measured data confirms that this combo delivers exceptional performance across all tested resolutions and settings, with no configuration dropping below 100 FPS average.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 208.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 173.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 129.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 100.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 373.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 309.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 231.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 179.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 563.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 468.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 349.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 271.0 |
Counter-Strike 2 with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RTX 5070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.