Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 146 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 53 | 67 | 89 | 109 |
| 1440p QHD | 95 | 119 | 160 | 193 |
| 1080p Full HD | 142 | 186 | 243 | 297 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
Counter-Strike 2 with the Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a pairing that scales predictably with resolution, but the data reveals a system that is firmly GPU-bound at higher settings. The measured FPS range from a highly playable 66.8 FPS at 4K High to an exceptionally fluid 296.8 FPS at 1080p Low. The combination ranks in the 82nd percentile (1341 out of 1632) for this title, indicating a solid, above-average performer for competitive play, though the drop from 1080p to 4K shows where the RTX 2060 begins to struggle.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 clearly identifies the GPU as the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU holds up well at lower ones. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 186.1 FPS at 1080p to 118.5 FPS at 1440p, a 36% decrease, and then further to 66.8 FPS at 4K, a 44% drop from 1440p. This steep decline is classic evidence of pixel-pushing pressure overwhelming the RTX 2060's 6 GB VRAM and 192-bit memory bus.
Switching to Low settings demonstrates a similar trend but from a much higher baseline. The system achieves 296.8 FPS at 1080p, which falls to 193.3 FPS at 1440p and 108.5 FPS at 4K. The fact that the 4K Low score of 108.5 FPS is still higher than the 1080p Ultra score of 142.1 FPS indicates that the game's visual effects, not just resolution, have a massive impact on the GPU load. The scaling pattern suggests that the i5-12400F with its 6 cores and 12 threads is not the bottleneck at 1080p, as the frame rates in the 200-300 range are only achievable with a capable processor. However, at 4K, the RTX 2060's raw throughput is the ceiling, making resolution the dominant variable.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Counter-Strike 2 at 4K?
A: Yes, but only at lower quality presets. The data shows an average of 108.5 FPS at 4K Low, which is playable, but this drops to 66.8 FPS at High and 53.1 FPS at Ultra. For consistent 4K performance, sticking to Low or Medium (88.8 FPS) is necessary.
Q: What is the best resolution for competitive play?
A: The data strongly favors 1920x1080. At Low settings, the combo delivers 296.8 FPS, and even at High settings it maintains 186.1 FPS. These high frame rates are ideal for fast-paced FPS gameplay, providing smoother motion and lower input latency than the 1440p or 4K results.
Q: How much does the Ultra preset cost in performance compared to High?
A: The jump from High to Ultra is significant. At 1080p, the average FPS drops from 186.1 to 142.1, a 24% reduction. At 1440p, it goes from 118.5 to 94.8, and at 4K from 66.8 to 53.1. Ultra settings demand a heavy toll on the RTX 2060.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game with this setup?
A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K and at higher settings, as evidenced by the large FPS drops when increasing resolution. At 1080p Low, the CPU's capability is more visible, allowing the system to reach 296.8 FPS. The CPU appears sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions.
Q: How does this combo rank among other tested systems?
A: The combination ranks 1341 out of 1632 tested combos for Counter-Strike 2. This places it above the median, suggesting it is a better performer than roughly 82% of the systems in the database for this specific game.
Q: What is the performance difference between 1440p and 1080p?
A: At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 242.8 at 1080p to 160.2 at 1440p, a 34% decrease. This gap is consistent across other presets, showing that 1440p offers a significant visual upgrade but requires a substantial frame rate compromise.
Settings Recommendations
The optimal settings for this hardware depend entirely on the target resolution. For 1080p, the data shows that High settings provide an excellent balance, delivering 186.1 FPS. This is well above the 144Hz refresh rate common on competitive monitors and leaves headroom for demanding scenes. While Low settings push the average to 296.8 FPS, the visual sacrifice is likely not worth the extra frames for most players, as High already provides a fluid experience.
For 1440p, Medium settings are the sweet spot. The measured 160.2 FPS is highly playable, while High drops to 118.5 FPS and Ultra falls to 94.8 FPS. Medium maintains a high refresh rate experience without the significant visual downgrade seen at Low (193.3 FPS). At 4K, the choice is starker. Low settings at 108.5 FPS is the only way to ensure a consistently smooth experience. Medium at 88.8 FPS is acceptable, but High (66.8) and Ultra (53.1) fall below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for a responsive game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system shows its strength. Low settings yield an average of 296.8 FPS, which is an exceptional result for competitive play. Moving up the preset ladder, Medium produces 242.8 FPS, High drops to 186.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 142.1 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is a notable 44 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the performance curve shifts downward. Low settings still provide a high 193.3 FPS, but Medium falls to 160.2 FPS. High settings generate 118.5 FPS, which is suitable for 120Hz displays, while Ultra drops to 94.8 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 51% performance reduction.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 2060 is heavily taxed. Low settings manage 108.5 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 88.8 FPS. High settings fall to 66.8 FPS, and Ultra dips to 53.1 FPS. This resolution clearly pushes the 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth to their limits, with the Ultra preset resulting in a sub-60 FPS experience.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 combination ranks 1341 out of 1632 tested combos in Counter-Strike 2. This places it in the top 82% of systems, indicating that it is a competent performer for this title, though not a top-tier one. The ranking suggests that while the combo excels at producing high frame rates at 1080p, it is likely held back by the GPU in more demanding scenarios, such as 4K Ultra.
The CPU's individual benchmark score of 19221 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i7-8700K (0.1% faster) and AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (0.3% faster). This shows the i5-12400F is a very capable processor. The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 16074, sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600S being a close rival (0.5% faster). The disconnect between the CPU's strong percentile and the GPU's middling one confirms that the RTX 2060 is the component limiting the overall combo's rank.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F provides the foundation for this system's high frame rates. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Alder Lake architecture, it offers a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its benchmark results are strong, showing a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16518 and a single-core score of 2332. This single-threaded strength is crucial for Counter-Strike 2.
The data suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck at lower resolutions. The ability to hit 296.8 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the processor can handle the game's simulation and draw calls at a very high rate. The CPU's performance percentile of 77 vs all CPUs reinforces its capability. However, as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's high frame rate potential becomes less relevant. The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain smooth performance in complex scenarios.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the decisive component in this pairing, and its specifications explain the FPS scaling seen in the data. It features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz. The TU106 chip on a 12 nm process includes 1920 shading units.
The GPU's role is clear: it is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The performance drop from 1080p High (186.1 FPS) to 4K High (66.8 FPS) is a direct result of the GPU having to render four times the pixels. The VRAM capacity of 6 GB is also a concern at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS falls to 53.1. The benchmark metrics for the GPU, such as a Passmark G3D score of 14111 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1242, place it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, which is a modest showing. The RTX 2060 is a capable 1080p performer, but its architecture and memory subsystem limit its 4K potential.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 108.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 88.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 66.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 53.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 193.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 160.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 118.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 94.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 296.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 242.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 186.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 142.1 |
Counter-Strike 2 with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.