Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

AVERAGE FPS
279
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 279 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 100 129 173 208
1440p QHD 179 231 309 373
1080p Full HD 271 349 468 563

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 208
3840x2160 Medium 173
3840x2160 High 129
3840x2160 Ultra 100
2560x1440 Low 373
2560x1440 Medium 309
2560x1440 High 231
2560x1440 Ultra 179
1920x1080 Low 563
1920x1080 Medium 468
1920x1080 High 349
1920x1080 Ultra 271

Counter-Strike 2 with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates for Counter-Strike 2 with the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 show a clear and expected pattern: performance scales down as resolution increases, but the scaling is not uniform across all settings presets. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 563 FPS, which drops to 373 FPS at 1440p Low and further to 208 FPS at 4K Low. This represents a 63% reduction from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions even on the least demanding preset.

The scaling story changes when examining the High preset. At 1080p High, the average is 349 FPS, dropping to 231 FPS at 1440p High, and then to 129 FPS at 4K High. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is roughly 63% again, but the absolute headroom is much smaller. The Ultra preset shows a similar pattern: 271 FPS at 1080p, 179 FPS at 1440p, and 100 FPS at 4K. The Medium preset, which is the only one with min and max FPS data, provides additional insight: 468 FPS at 1080p with a minimum of 397 FPS, 309 FPS at 1440p with a minimum of 263 FPS, and 173 FPS at 4K with a minimum of 147 FPS.

What the data reveals is that the CPU, with its 12 cores and 24 threads based on Zen 5 architecture, is more than capable of feeding the RTX 5070 at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 563 FPS result is clearly CPU-bound territory, where the GPU is not the primary constraint. However, as resolution climbs to 4K, the GPU's workload increases significantly, and the frame rates drop to levels that are still highly playable but indicate that the RTX 5070 is now the bottleneck. The 4K Ultra result of 100 FPS is the lowest measured figure, showing that even this high-end combo has limits when pushing maximum settings at 4K.

The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is less severe than from 1440p to 4K. For example, at High settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p costs 118 FPS, while moving from 1440p to 4K costs 102 FPS. At Low settings, the drop is 190 FPS from 1080p to 1440p, and 165 FPS from 1440p to 4K. This suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory are adequate for 1440p, but at 4K the demands on both bandwidth and capacity start to show in the diminishing returns.

The limiting component analysis points to the GPU at 4K, particularly on Ultra settings where the 100 FPS average is far below the 271 FPS at 1080p. The RTX 5070's boost clock of 2512 MHz and its 6144 shading units are working hard, but the 192-bit memory bus and 12 GB capacity are the likely constraints. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3dmark single-thread score of 1269, keeps frame rates extremely high, but the GPU cannot sustain that pace at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience for this hardware combination. The Medium preset at 1440p stands out as the sweet spot: 309 FPS average with a minimum of 263 FPS and maximum of 356 FPS. This balances visual quality with performance headroom, ensuring that even in intense firefights, the frame rate stays well above 240 FPS, which is the target for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1080p, the High preset at 349 FPS is a strong recommendation for competitive play. It offers significantly better visual fidelity than Low (563 FPS) while still maintaining frame rates that exceed the refresh rates of most gaming monitors. The jump from High to Ultra at 1080p costs 78 FPS (349 to 271), which is substantial for a settings change that may not deliver a proportional visual improvement in a fast-paced FPS like Counter-Strike 2. The Ultra preset's 271 FPS is still excellent, but the extra GPU load may introduce more frame time variance in crowded scenes.

For 4K gaming, the High preset at 129 FPS is the most balanced option. The Ultra preset drops to 100 FPS, which is playable but leaves less margin for drops during heavy action sequences. The Medium preset at 4K delivers 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 FPS, making it the best choice for players who prioritize smoothness over maximum detail. The Low preset at 4K (208 FPS) is unnecessary for most users, as the visual compromises are not worth the extra 79 FPS over High.

The data suggests that the Medium preset is the most versatile across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the 468 FPS average is only 95 FPS short of Low, but the visual upgrade is noticeable. At 1440p Medium, the 309 FPS result is ideal for 240 Hz monitors. At 4K Medium, the 173 FPS average with a 147 FPS minimum ensures consistent performance. The Medium preset's min FPS figures, which are the only ones recorded in the data, show that the frame pacing is stable: the minimums are 85% of the averages at 1080p and 1440p, and 85% at 4K.

Players with 360 Hz or 500 Hz displays at 1080p should consider the Low preset (563 FPS) to maximize refresh rate utilization, but the High preset at 349 FPS is the practical recommendation for most competitive scenarios. The Ultra preset should be reserved for players who prioritize image quality and have displays with refresh rates below 240 Hz, as the 271 FPS at 1080p and 179 FPS at 1440p are still excellent results.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 plays a central role in this combo's performance, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The boost clock is 2512 MHz, with a base clock of 2325 MHz. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective. These specifications, combined with 6144 shading units and 80 ROPs, determine the GPU's ability to render Counter-Strike 2 at various settings.

The VRAM allocation is adequate for this game at 4K Ultra, as the 12 GB capacity is not exceeded based on the measured results. However, the 192-bit bus width limits memory bandwidth compared to wider-bus cards. The data shows that at 4K, the frame rates drop significantly from Low (208 FPS) to Ultra (100 FPS), which is a 52% reduction purely from settings changes. This indicates that the GPU's compute and memory subsystems are heavily taxed at 4K Ultra, where the pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s are pushed to their limits.

The RTX 5070's benchmark scores provide context for its performance tier. The 3dmark steel nomad dx12 score of 5077 and the passmark g3d score of 29137 place it in the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. The geekbench vulkan score of 178923 and opencl score of 172660 show strong compute capabilities. The GPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Radeon Pro 580, which is 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100, which is 0.8% behind. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% behind. This places the RTX 5070 in a tight cluster of similar-performing GPUs, though these rivals are not directly comparable for gaming in Counter-Strike 2.

The GPU's 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 30.87 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1) provide the raw compute needed for the game's rendering. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are present but are not heavily utilized in Counter-Strike 2, which is primarily a rasterization-based title. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compliance ensure compatibility with modern APIs, though the game's engine may benefit more from raw raster performance than from ray tracing features.

The 250 W TDP and the suggested 600 W PSU indicate that the GPU is a mid-range power consumer, but the data shows that its performance in Counter-Strike 2 is substantial. The dual-slot design and 245 mm length make it a standard-sized card that fits in most cases. The 1x 16-pin power connector is modern, and the display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting high-refresh-rate monitors.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive picture of performance. At 3840x2160, the results are: Low averages 208 FPS, Medium averages 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 FPS and maximum of 199 FPS, High averages 129 FPS, and Ultra averages 100 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K is the only one with min/max data, showing a range of 52 FPS between the minimum and maximum.

At 2560x1440, the performance improves substantially: Low averages 373 FPS, Medium averages 309 FPS with a minimum of 263 FPS and maximum of 356 FPS, High averages 231 FPS, and Ultra averages 179 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p shows a 93 FPS range between minimum and maximum, indicating some frame time variance but still maintaining high minimums.

At 1920x1080, the results are exceptional: Low averages 563 FPS, Medium averages 468 FPS with a minimum of 397 FPS and maximum of 538 FPS, High averages 349 FPS, and Ultra averages 271 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p has a 141 FPS range between minimum and maximum, which is the largest absolute range in the data but still keeps the minimum above 397 FPS.

The pattern across all resolutions is consistent: Low is fastest, followed by Medium, then High, and Ultra is slowest. The relative gaps between presets vary by resolution. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Medium is 95 FPS, between Medium and High is 119 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 78 FPS. At 1440p, the gaps are 64 FPS (Low to Medium), 78 FPS (Medium to High), and 52 FPS (High to Ultra). At 4K, the gaps are 35 FPS (Low to Medium), 44 FPS (Medium to High), and 29 FPS (High to Ultra).

This data shows that the absolute FPS drop from changing settings is larger at lower resolutions, but the percentage drop is more consistent. At 1080p, Ultra is 52% of Low's performance; at 1440p, Ultra is 48% of Low; at 4K, Ultra is 48% of Low. This suggests that the GPU is scaling predictably with settings changes across resolutions, though the absolute numbers are lower at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination ranks 539th out of 2870 tested combos in Counter-Strike 2, placing it in the top 19% of all configurations. This rank is surprisingly modest given the high-end nature of both components, but it reflects the fact that Counter-Strike 2 is a highly optimized esports title where even mid-range hardware can achieve high frame rates, and the competition at the top is fierce with many combos achieving similar or better results.

The CPU's percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 91st, meaning it outperforms 91% of CPUs in general benchmarks. The GPU's percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 82nd. However, in this specific game, the combo rank of 539 out of 2870 indicates that many other combinations of CPUs and GPUs are capable of matching or exceeding this performance. This is likely because Counter-Strike 2 is more dependent on single-thread CPU performance than on GPU raw power, and the game's engine can leverage high clock speeds effectively.

The CPU's nearest rivals in general benchmarks include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which is 0.6% behind in average score, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, which is 1.3% ahead. The Intel Xeon 6505P is 2% ahead, and the Intel Core i7-14700F is 2.1% ahead. These small deltas show that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is competitive with other high-end CPUs, but the differences are minor in general workloads.

The GPU's nearest rivals are less relevant for gaming comparisons, as they include professional workstation cards like the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100. The deltaPct values show that the RTX 5070 is within 2% of these cards in average benchmark scores, but their gaming performance in Counter-Strike 2 would differ due to driver optimizations and architectural differences.

The combo rank of 539 suggests that players looking for higher rankings might consider pairing the Ryzen 9 9900X3D with a more powerful GPU, or alternatively, pairing a less expensive CPU with the RTX 5070 to achieve similar results. However, the measured FPS data shows that this combo delivers excellent performance in absolute terms, with 563 FPS at 1080p Low and 349 FPS at 1080p High being well above what most displays can show.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture and Granite Ridge codename. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. The CPU features 128 MB of L3 cache, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. These specifications make it a formidable gaming CPU, particularly in titles that benefit from high cache capacities.

In Counter-Strike 2, the CPU's role is critical at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The 3dmark single-thread score of 1269 and the 3dmark 2-thread score of 2512 indicate strong single-thread performance, which is essential for the game's main game logic thread. The cinebench r23 singlecore score of 6739 and geekbench singlecore score of 3041 further confirm this. The passmark single-thread score of 4646 is also high.

The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are less relevant for Counter-Strike 2, as the game typically uses only a few threads. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 12490 and the cinebench r23 multicore score of 47737 show that the CPU can handle heavily threaded workloads, but these are not the primary drivers of FPS in this game. The 128 MB of L3 cache is a standout feature, as it can hold more game data, potentially reducing memory latency and improving frame pacing.

The measured FPS at 1080p Low (563 FPS) suggests that the CPU is capable of driving extremely high frame rates, and the GPU is the limiting factor even at this resolution. The fact that the combo ranks 539th out of 2870 indicates that other CPUs with higher single-thread clocks or better memory latency might achieve even higher FPS in this game. The CPU's benchmark scores place it in the 91st percentile, but the game's specific demands may favor CPUs with higher boost clocks over those with more cores.

The CPU's launch MSRP of $599 positions it as a high-end processor, and its release date of 2025-01-05 makes it a recent addition to the market. The 4 nm process node and 16,630 million transistors on a 2x 70.6 mm² die size show that it is a complex chip. The AM5 socket and PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes provide a modern platform, and the integrated Radeon Graphics offer a fallback display output, though the discrete RTX 5070 handles the gaming workload.

In summary, the CPU's high single-thread performance and large cache are well-suited for Counter-Strike 2, but the game's engine is not heavily multi-threaded, so the 12-core configuration does not provide a significant advantage over fewer-core CPUs with similar single-thread capabilities. The data shows that the combo is not in the top ranks, but it still delivers exceptional frame rates, confirming that the CPU is not a weak link in this configuration.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2512 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Counter-Strike 2

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 208.0
3840x2160 Medium 173.0
3840x2160 High 129.0
3840x2160 Ultra 100.0
2560x1440 Low 373.0
2560x1440 Medium 309.0
2560x1440 High 231.0
2560x1440 Ultra 179.0
1920x1080 Low 563.0
1920x1080 Medium 468.0
1920x1080 High 349.0
1920x1080 Ultra 271.0

Counter-Strike 2 with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 5070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.