Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
106
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 106 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 63 71 95
1440p QHD 82 94 107 145
1080p Full HD 107 123 136 193

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 95
3840x2160 Medium 71
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Ultra 52
2560x1440 Low 145
2560x1440 Medium 107
2560x1440 High 94
2560x1440 Ultra 82
1920x1080 Low 193
1920x1080 Medium 136
1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Ultra 107

Control with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis

Control’s surreal, physics-heavy action-adventure environments place a heavy load on both the CPU and GPU, and the measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination reveals a system that is consistently capable across all tested configurations. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy of performance that scales predictably with both resolution and graphical presets, offering useful insights into where this pairing excels and where its limitations appear. The data indicates a strong 1080p performer that remains very playable at higher resolutions, though the most demanding settings at 4K will test its limits.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of which preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance for this specific CPU and GPU pairing. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 106.8 FPS, which is well above the standard 60 FPS threshold and only 15.7 FPS lower than the High preset’s 122.5 FPS. Given the relatively modest cost in frames for the jump from High to Ultra, the Ultra preset at 1080p is the recommended choice for users with standard refresh rate monitors, as it extracts the maximum visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above 100 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the data shows the High preset achieving 94.1 FPS, while Ultra drops to 82 FPS. The High preset here offers the best experience, as it stays above 90 FPS and provides a smoother experience than Ultra, which, while still playable, begins to approach the 80 FPS mark. The Medium preset at 107 FPS is an alternative for those prioritizing frame rate over visual detail, but High is the sweet spot. At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. The High preset manages an average of 63 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target, while Ultra falls to 52.2 FPS. For 4K, the High preset is the clear recommendation, as it is the only setting that provides a consistently smooth experience without dipping below the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset at 4K achieves 95.4 FPS, but the visual compromises are likely too significant for a game that relies on atmosphere and detail.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Control with this hardware combination?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 at the Ultra preset offers the best overall experience, delivering an average of 106.8 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the strongest option at 94.1 FPS, while 3840x2160 at High is the only 4K setting that achieves a playable average above 60 FPS.

Q: How much of a performance drop occurs when moving from 1080p to 4K on the High preset?

A: The measured average FPS drops from 122.5 at 1920x1080 to 94.1 at 2560x1440, and finally to 63 at 3840x2160. This represents a significant 59.5 FPS reduction from the lowest to highest resolution tested.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 in this game?

A: The data suggests the CPU is not the primary limiting factor at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 193 FPS, indicating strong CPU headroom. However, the diminishing returns when raising resolution and settings point to the GPU becoming the dominant constraint, especially at 4K.

Q: How much of a difference does the Ultra preset make compared to High at 1440p?

A: The measured difference is 12.1 FPS, with High averaging 94.1 FPS and Ultra averaging 82 FPS. This is a noticeable drop that could be felt on high refresh rate displays, making High the more balanced choice.

Q: Does this combo rank high among all tested systems for Control?

A: The combo rank is 412 out of 1636 tested combinations. This places it in the top 25% of all tested systems, indicating a strong performance tier, though it is not among the absolute top-tier configurations.

Q: What is the frame rate ceiling for this combination?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 193 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the maximum performance ceiling of this pairing, showing its capability for high-refresh-rate gaming, though at reduced visual quality.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K brings 20 cores and 20 threads to the table, a configuration that, combined with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, provides substantial processing capability. In the context of Control, which is known for its physics simulations and destructible environments, this core count is likely a significant factor in maintaining high frame rates, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is less strained. The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 193 FPS, a figure that suggests the CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU with data. This is reinforced by the CPU’s 97th percentile ranking against all CPUs and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50009, which indicates strong parallel processing power.

However, the CPU’s role becomes less prominent as the resolution increases. The measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a steady decline, which is typical of GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.50 GHz is clearly effective for single-threaded tasks, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7060. This clock speed advantage is likely what allows the system to maintain a 122.5 FPS average at 1080p High without the CPU becoming a bottleneck. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with data throughput. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 7 265K is essentially tied with the Core Ultra 7 265KF and Core i9-14900KF, showing a -0.2% difference in average benchmark score, which suggests that in this game, the CPU is performing exactly as expected for its class.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 achieves a rank of 412 out of 1636 tested combos in Control. This places the system in the 75th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms roughly 75% of other pairings. This is a strong result, indicating that this is a well-balanced setup for this particular title. The rank suggests that while there are many faster systems, this combo is firmly in the upper echelon of performance. The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs and the CPU’s 97th percentile ranking highlight that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, but the overall combo rank is tempered by the GPU’s mid-range positioning. The data implies that the RTX 4070 is the limiting factor preventing this combo from ranking higher, as the CPU has significant headroom. This is consistent with the FPS data showing a GPU-bound trend at higher resolutions. The rank of 412 is a respectable showing, confirming that users of this hardware can expect a high-quality experience in Control without needing to compromise heavily on settings.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable pattern of scaling across the three tested resolutions. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system averages 122.5 FPS. When moving to 2560x1440, the average drops to 94.1 FPS, a reduction of 28.4 FPS. Continuing to 3840x2160, the average falls to 63 FPS, a further reduction of 31.1 FPS. This linear progression indicates that the rendering load is scaling directly with the pixel count, which is the hallmark of a GPU-limited scenario. The data shows that the RTX 4070 is the primary component being stressed as resolution increases.

Further evidence for this is seen when examining the Low preset. At 1080p Low, the system hits 193 FPS, but at 4K Low, it still manages 95.4 FPS. The relative drop from 1080p to 4K on Low is 97.6 FPS, which is a larger absolute drop than on High (59.5 FPS). This suggests that at lower settings, the GPU is still the bottleneck, but the CPU is able to push higher frame rates, which in turn makes the GPU’s workload more apparent. The scaling pattern strongly implies that the GPU is the limiting component across all tested configurations. The CPU, with its high core count and clock speeds, provides sufficient performance to avoid becoming a constraint, even at the highest frame rates measured. This analysis points to the RTX 4070 as the component to upgrade for users seeking higher performance at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured FPS averages provides a detailed look at the system’s performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the results are: Low averages 193 FPS, Medium averages 135.6 FPS, High averages 122.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 106.8 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 86.2 FPS, showing a significant performance cost for higher visual fidelity. At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 144.9 FPS, Medium at 107 FPS, High at 94.1 FPS, and Ultra at 82 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 62.9 FPS, indicating that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor. At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 95.4 FPS, Medium at 71.4 FPS, High at 63 FPS, and Ultra at 52.2 FPS. The margin between the lowest and highest preset is 43.2 FPS, showing that at 4K, the GPU’s performance ceiling is being reached.

The data shows that the Medium preset consistently offers a significant jump over Low, while the jump from High to Ultra is smaller. For example, at 1440p, the difference between Low and Medium is 37.9 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is only 12.1 FPS. This suggests that the Ultra preset’s additional effects are more demanding relative to their visual benefit. The 4K Ultra result of 52.2 FPS is the only measured average that falls below the 60 FPS target, indicating that this is the only configuration that would struggle to provide a smooth experience on a standard display.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU’s boost clock of 2475 MHz and its 5888 shading units are key to its performance in Control. The measured data shows that the GPU’s role becomes more dominant as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU is able to maintain high frame rates across all presets, with the lowest result being 106.8 FPS on Ultra. At 1440p, the GPU still performs well but shows signs of strain on the Ultra preset, dropping to 82 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, with even the High preset only achieving 63 FPS.

The 12 GB of VRAM is likely sufficient for Control’s textures and effects at the tested settings, as no anomalies in the FPS data suggest memory-related stuttering. The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is a solid mid-to-high-range card. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, which it outperforms by -0.6%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, which it trails by -2.2%. This positioning confirms that the RTX 4070 is a capable card for this game, but its performance ceiling is evident at 4K. The data suggests that for users wanting to play at 4K with higher frame rates, a more powerful GPU would be necessary, but for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the RTX 4070 provides a very strong experience.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2475 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 95.4
3840x2160 Medium 71.4
3840x2160 High 63.0
3840x2160 Ultra 52.2
2560x1440 Low 144.9
2560x1440 Medium 107.0
2560x1440 High 94.1
2560x1440 Ultra 82.0
1920x1080 Low 193.0
1920x1080 Medium 135.6
1920x1080 High 122.5
1920x1080 Ultra 106.8

Control with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 4070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.