Control

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile delivers a compelling performance profile in Control, a 2019 Action Adventure title. This combination achieves high frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings, with the data indicating a strong balance between the 14-core CPU and the 16 GB GPU. Benchmark results show that the system is capable of exceeding 60 FPS at 4K Ultra, making it a viable option for high-fidelity gameplay. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and scaling characteristics based solely on the provided data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among all tested systems in Control?*

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile combination ranks 866th out of 3720 total tested combos. This places it in the top 23.3% of all configurations, indicating a strong, above-average performance level for this specific game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, scores 29123, a negligible difference of -0.1%. Similarly, the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, which is -0.6% relative to the 135H. The data shows the 135H is effectively performance-equivalent to these desktop-class rivals.

*Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Control?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 194, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is nearly double the frame rate of the High preset at the same resolution, which averages 122 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 4090 Mobile outperform its closest GPU rivals based on average benchmark scores?

A: Yes, the RTX 4090 Mobile's average benchmark score is 43667. It leads the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 by 0.8% (43301) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 0.9% (43268). However, it trails the NVIDIA RTX A6000, which scores 44075, a difference of -0.9%.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High settings, the average FPS is 122. When resolution is increased to 3840x2160 High, the average drops to 62 FPS. This represents a 50.8% reduction in frame rate, demonstrating a significant performance cost for the higher pixel count.

Q: Is there a measurable minimum FPS for the Medium settings preset?

A: Yes, the Medium preset provides minimum FPS data across all resolutions. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 60 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 89 FPS; and at 1920x1080, it is 117 FPS. This indicates that frame pacing remains consistent, with the minimum never dropping below 60 FPS at any tested resolution.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the primary driver of performance in Control's graphics-intensive scenes. This GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This substantial memory allocation and bandwidth are crucial for handling the game's high-resolution textures and complex visual effects without bottlenecking.

The GPU's clock speeds are listed as a base of 1335 MHz and a boost of 1695 MHz. The memory operates at 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. These specifications contribute to the GPU's high pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 515.3 GTexel/s, which are fundamental to rendering detailed frames at high resolutions.

In the benchmark data, the GPU's computational power is evident. At 4K Ultra settings, the combo still manages an average of 54 FPS, showing that the RTX 4090 Mobile's 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient to push through the most demanding preset. The GPU's 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores are part of its architecture, though the provided data does not include specific ray tracing performance metrics for Control. The GPU's percentile rank of 84 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43667, confirms its position as a high-end mobile solution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 866 out of 3720 tested combinations places it in the upper quartile of all systems tested for Control. This is a strong showing, though not the absolute top, indicating that while the GPU and CPU are both powerful, other combinations may achieve even higher frame rates. The ranking suggests that this pairing is well-suited for high refresh rate gaming at 1440p and solid 4K performance, but it is not the definitive fastest configuration available.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 29093 places it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and Intel Core i5-13500HX, have nearly identical scores, with deltas of -0.1% and -0.6% respectively. This means the 135H provides comparable processing power to these established desktop chips. The GPU, with a percentile rank of 84, is also positioned well above average. Together, these components synergize to produce the observed 866th rank, a result that reflects a balanced system with no single component acting as a severe bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. The data is consistent, showing expected scaling as resolution and graphical fidelity increase.

1920x1080:

• Low: Average 194 FPS
• Medium: Average 138 FPS (min 117, max 158)
• High: Average 122 FPS
• Ultra: Average 106 FPS

At 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-bound, with the CPU providing ample headroom. The jump from Low to Medium is a 56 FPS reduction, while the step from High to Ultra is only 16 FPS, showing diminishing returns at the highest settings.

2560x1440:

• Low: Average 147 FPS
• Medium: Average 104 FPS (min 89, max 120)
• High: Average 93 FPS
• Ultra: Average 80 FPS

At 1440p, the performance scales predictably. The difference between Low and Ultra is 67 FPS, a 45.6% drop. This resolution represents the sweet spot for high refresh rate monitors, as even Ultra settings maintain an 80 FPS average.

3840x2160:

• Low: Average 99 FPS
• Medium: Average 70 FPS (min 60, max 81)
• High: Average 62 FPS
• Ultra: Average 54 FPS

At 4K, the GPU is under maximum load. The Medium preset's minimum of 60 FPS ensures a playable experience, but Ultra dips to 54 FPS on average. The data indicates that 4K gaming is viable, but users seeking a consistent 60+ FPS experience may need to adjust settings below Ultra.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture. It operates at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and can boost up to 4.60 GHz. This high core count and boost clock provide substantial multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, as reflected in its benchmark scores: 11875.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1700 in single-core.

In Control, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw call processing. The data suggests that the 135H is more than capable of feeding the RTX 4090 Mobile, as frame rates scale primarily with resolution and settings, not CPU load. The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth data flow, preventing stutters.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 29093, which places it in the 81st percentile, is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (29123, -0.1%). This parity means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 135H will deliver performance on par with a high-end desktop processor from a previous generation. The 28W TDP of the 135H is noteworthy, as it indicates efficient power usage while maintaining competitive performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the user's display resolution and performance target. For a 60 FPS target, the data shows the following:

• 1080p: The Ultra preset averages 106 FPS, which is well above 60. For maximum visual fidelity, Ultra is the clear choice, as it still provides a high frame rate. Users prioritizing refresh rate can consider High or Medium, which offer 122 and 138 FPS respectively.

• 1440p: The Ultra preset averages 80 FPS, which comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. This is the recommended choice for 1440p displays, as it balances visual quality with performance. The High preset at 93 FPS is an alternative for those seeking higher frame rates.

• 4K: The Ultra preset averages only 54 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset averages 62 FPS, making it the best choice for a stable 60 FPS experience at 4K. The Medium preset at 70 FPS provides additional headroom for frame rate variability, with a minimum of 60 FPS.

The data indicates that the Medium preset provides the most consistent frame pacing, as it is the only preset with recorded minimum FPS values. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 60 FPS, ensuring no drops below the playable threshold.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates the GPU-bound nature of Control with this hardware. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 122 at 1080p to 93 at 1440p, a 23.8% reduction, and then to 62 at 4K, a 50.8% reduction from 1080p. This scaling pattern is typical for a system where the GPU is the primary limiting factor.

The RTX 4090 Mobile's 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for all tested settings, as there are no signs of memory-related performance cliffs. The bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s supports the increased pixel throughput required at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance remains constant across resolutions, as evidenced by the consistent frame rate ratios between settings at each resolution.

The data shows that the transition from 1440p to 4K is the most demanding, with a 33 FPS drop at High settings (93 to 62 FPS). This suggests that for 4K gaming, users must accept either a lower settings preset or a frame rate below 60 FPS on Ultra. The scaling behavior confirms that the RTX 4090 Mobile is the component determining the performance ceiling, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H provides sufficient headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck.