Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 66 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 39 | 42 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 58 | 65 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 77 | 85 | 126 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT paired with the Intel Core i7-14700K delivers a highly capable 1080p experience in Control, but the data reveals a significant bottleneck at higher resolutions, with the GPU struggling to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K. The combination ranks in the 1082nd position out of 1636 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier for this specific title despite the CPU’s strength.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?
A: The data shows 1920x1080 as the only resolution where all settings presets achieve playable frame rates, with average FPS ranging from 65.4 at Ultra to 126 at Low. At 2560x1440, the average drops to between 52.2 and 91.7, while 3840x2160 falls below 60 FPS for every preset except Low.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in overall performance?
A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20146, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600's score of 20258. It sits 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, which scores 19774, and 1.9% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534.
Q: What is the CPU's standing among all tested processors?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700K ranks in the 96th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70074. This places it nearly identical to the Core i7-14700KF, which scores 70104, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X at 70420.
Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for Control?
A: The RX 7600 XT comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While this capacity is substantial, the 4K Ultra result of 32 FPS suggests that raw memory size is not the limiting factor; the GPU's compute throughput is the constraint.
Q: How does the FPS scale from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the average frame rate decreases from 126 FPS at Low to 84.9 at Medium, 77.4 at High, and finally 65.4 at Ultra. This represents a 48% reduction from Low to Ultra, indicating that higher settings impose a significant load on the GPU.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this specific combo in Control?
A: The combination of the Core i7-14700K and RX 7600 XT ranks 1082 out of 1636 tested combos in Control, placing it in the 66th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's top-tier performance.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data shows that the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 77.4 FPS, which balances visual quality with smoothness, while Ultra drops to 65.4 FPS—still playable but with diminishing returns. For competitive or high-refresh-rate play, the Low preset at 126 FPS is the clear choice, but it sacrifices significant visual fidelity.
At 2560x1440, the High preset yields 57.8 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 64.8 FPS offers a better compromise, providing a more consistent frame rate while retaining moderate visual enhancements. The Low preset at 91.7 FPS is the only option that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for 1440p if frame rate is the priority.
At 3840x2160, no preset achieves a solid 60 FPS experience. The Low preset reaches 60.7 FPS, barely crossing the threshold, but the visual downgrade is substantial. The High preset at 39 FPS and Medium at 41.8 FPS are both choppy, while Ultra at 32 FPS is nearly unplayable. For 4K, the data suggests using Low settings if absolutely necessary, but the overall experience is suboptimal.
The best overall experience, based on the measured rows, is 1080p with High settings, which delivers 77.4 FPS—a solid balance of visual quality and smoothness. For users prioritizing frame rate above all else, 1080p Low at 126 FPS provides the headroom for high-refresh-rate displays.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo ranks 1082 out of 1636 tested configurations in Control, placing it in the lower half of the field. This positioning is primarily driven by the GPU's performance class, as the RX 7600 XT sits near the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. The CPU, by contrast, is in the 96th percentile of all processors, highlighting a significant mismatch in capability.
The data indicates that the combo's rank is not a reflection of the CPU's limitations. The Core i7-14700K's average benchmark score of 70074 is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and 1.4% of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, showing that it competes with much more expensive processors. However, the GPU's average score of 20146 is nearly identical to the RX 460, a much older and less capable card, which drags the overall rank down.
In practical terms, this means the combo performs well in CPU-bound scenarios but struggles in GPU-heavy titles like Control at high resolutions. The rank of 1082 out of 1636 suggests that there are 554 other configurations that deliver better frame rates, most of which likely pair stronger GPUs with similar or weaker CPUs.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS ranges from 126 at Low to 65.4 at Ultra. The progression is 126 (Low), 84.9 (Medium), 77.4 (High), and 65.4 (Ultra). The largest single-step drop occurs between Low and Medium, a 33% reduction, while the difference between High and Ultra is only 15%.
At 2560x1440, the averages are 91.7 (Low), 64.8 (Medium), 57.8 (High), and 52.2 (Ultra). The drop from Low to Medium is 29%, and the gap between Medium and High is 11%. The Ultra preset at 52.2 FPS is 43% slower than Low at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the results are 60.7 (Low), 41.8 (Medium), 39 (High), and 32 (Ultra). The Low preset is the only one above 60 FPS, while Ultra at 32 FPS is 47% slower than Low. The differences between Medium, High, and Ultra are relatively small, suggesting a hard performance ceiling.
Across all resolutions, the Low preset consistently provides the highest frame rates, while Ultra always delivers the lowest. The gap between Low and Ultra widens with resolution: 48% at 1080p, 43% at 1440p, and 47% at 4K, indicating that the GPU's load scales nearly uniformly with settings.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The boost clock is 2755 MHz, with a game clock of 2470 MHz, and the FP32 compute rate is 22.57 TFLOPS.
The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at an effective speed of 18 Gbps, producing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth over a 128-bit bus. This memory configuration is generous for the GPU's compute class, but the measured FPS in Control indicates that memory bandwidth is not the primary constraint. The pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s are mid-range figures that align with the observed performance.
The GPU's overall benchmark average is 20146, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RX 7600, scores 20258, a difference of only 0.6%, which explains why the two cards perform nearly identically in practice. The RX 7600 XT also sits 1.9% ahead of the RTX 2060 SUPER and 1.9% behind the RTX 3070 Mobile, confirming its position as a solid mainstream option.
In Control, the GPU's limitations become apparent at 4K, where even the High preset at 39 FPS cannot maintain smooth gameplay. The 16 GB VRAM is not exhausted, as evidenced by the relatively small performance gap between Medium and High at 4K, suggesting that the GPU's compute units are the bottleneck.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-14700K is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. It operates at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.
The CPU's benchmark results are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44534 and a single-core score of 6287. Its Geekbench multi-core score is 18896, while the Passmark multithread score reaches 52392. These numbers place the processor in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70074.
The nearest rivals show the CPU's competitive positioning. The Core i7-14700KF scores 70104, essentially identical with a 0% delta. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69887, a 0.3% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X at 70420 is 0.5% ahead. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 at 71056 leads by 1.4%.
In Control, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data, and its high single-thread performance of 6287 in R23 ensures that it does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. The 1080p results, where FPS scales with settings, confirm that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's demands. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's extra headroom is unused.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data shows a clear pattern of degradation as resolution increases. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 126 at 1080p to 91.7 at 1440p (a 27% reduction) and then to 60.7 at 4K (a 34% reduction from 1440p). This scaling is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU's performance is sufficient to maintain high frame rates.
At High settings, the averages are 77.4 at 1080p, 57.8 at 1440p, and 39 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 25%, and from 1440p to 4K is 33%. At Ultra settings, the averages are 65.4, 52.2, and 32, representing a 20% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 39% drop from 1440p to 4K.
The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steeper than from 1080p to 1440p across all settings, which indicates that the GPU is approaching its fill-rate limits. The pixel count increases by 2.25 times from 1440p to 4K, and the FPS drops by roughly one-third, suggesting that the GPU's shading and rasterization units are saturated.
The limiting component is clearly the GPU. The CPU's benchmark scores, particularly the single-core performance of 6287 in R23, are more than sufficient to handle the frame rates observed. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system reaches 126 FPS, but the GPU's compute capabilities cap the performance at higher resolutions, making the RX 7600 XT the definitive bottleneck in this configuration.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700K
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 60.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 39.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 32.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 64.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 57.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 126.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 84.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 77.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 65.4 |
Control with ii7-14700K + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700K + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.