Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 65 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 38 | 42 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 55 | 62 | 87 |
| 1080p Full HD | 66 | 77 | 87 | 119 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination ranks 1186th out of 1636 tested combos in Control, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This pairing of a top-tier 16-core processor with a mid-range Ampere GPU creates a significant performance imbalance, and the benchmark data consistently shows the graphics card as the primary constraint.
How This Combo Ranks
With a combo rank of 1186 out of 1636, this system sits in the 28th percentile among all tested configurations. This relatively low ranking reflects the RTX 3060 Ti's position in the GPU hierarchy — it holds the 69th percentile against all GPUs — rather than any deficiency in the processor. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a flagship part, ranking in the 96th percentile against all CPUs, but in Control the GPU becomes the limiting factor.
The processor's raw capability is substantial. Its average benchmark score of 71660 puts it 0.9% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 and 1.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D trails the Intel Xeon 6517P by 1.9%, but this margin is negligible in real-world gaming scenarios. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with 128 MB of shared L3 cache provides far more computational headroom than Control requires.
However, the GPU's average benchmark score of 25120 places it just 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700M and 0.5% behind both the AMD Radeon RX 6600 and AMD Radeon 890M. This clustering of scores within 0.7% of the RTX 3060 Ti's nearest rivals indicates that the graphics card is the decisive factor in this combo's ranking. The data suggests that swapping the processor for a much weaker CPU would produce nearly identical frame rates in this game, while upgrading the GPU would yield substantial gains.
FAQ
*Q: Is this combo better suited for 1080p or 4K gaming in Control?*
A: The data shows this combo performs best at 1080p, where it achieves 119.2 FPS on Low settings, but drops to 34.4 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 4K results fall below 60 FPS across all settings, making 1080p the only resolution where consistently high frame rates are achievable.
Q: How much of a performance gap exists between Low and Ultra settings?
A: At 1080p, the gap between Low (119.2 FPS) and Ultra (65.9 FPS) is 53.3 FPS, representing a 45% reduction in frame rate. At 4K, the same settings comparison shows a drop from 58.3 FPS to 34.4 FPS, a 41% reduction.
Q: Does the Ryzen 9 9950X3D bottleneck the RTX 3060 Ti in this game?
A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the bottleneck. The RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU's 128 MB L3 cache and high single-thread performance are more than sufficient for Control.
Q: What is the best resolution-to-settings combination for smooth gameplay?
A: The 1080p Medium preset (86.9 FPS) offers a strong balance, while 1440p High (55 FPS) is playable. For 60+ FPS at 1440p, the Low preset (87.4 FPS) is required, indicating that resolution scaling has a significant impact on this GPU.
Q: How does this combo compare to others in the database for this game?
A: At rank 1186 out of 1636, this combo is in the lower 28% of tested configurations. This is primarily due to the RTX 3060 Ti's 69th percentile GPU ranking, which limits the system despite the CPU's 96th percentile ranking.
*Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti's VRAM sufficient for Control at 4K?*
A: The 8 GB VRAM buffer, combined with the 256-bit memory bus, produces 4K results ranging from 34.4 FPS (Ultra) to 58.3 FPS (Low). The relatively modest frame rates suggest the VRAM capacity and bandwidth are constraints at this resolution.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. It operates at a base clock of 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, delivering 16.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
These specifications position the RTX 3060 Ti at the 69th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25120. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, scores 25180 (0.2% higher), while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 scores 25235 (0.5% higher). This tight grouping indicates that the RTX 3060 Ti is squarely in the mid-range segment.
In Control, the GPU's role is decisive. The measured frame rates show a clear pattern where resolution increases cause proportionally larger performance drops. At 1080p Low, the card produces 119.2 FPS, but at 4K Low, this falls to 58.3 FPS. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results suggest the card is operating at its limits.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 3060 Ti delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves 119.2 FPS, Medium reaches 86.9 FPS, High produces 76.5 FPS, and Ultra drops to 65.9 FPS. All four settings at 1080p exceed 60 FPS, making this resolution the most viable for consistent gameplay.
The 2560x1440 results show a significant step down. Low settings produce 87.4 FPS, Medium drops to 62.1 FPS, High falls to 55 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 49.6 FPS. Only the Low and Medium presets maintain frame rates above 60 FPS at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the performance becomes marginal. Low settings yield 58.3 FPS, Medium produces 42.3 FPS, High drops to 38 FPS, and Ultra manages only 34.4 FPS. No 4K preset reaches 60 FPS, indicating that this resolution is not suitable for smooth gameplay with this GPU.
The progression from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows consistent degradation across all settings. The largest absolute drop occurs between 1080p Low (119.2 FPS) and 1440p Low (87.4 FPS), a reduction of 31.8 FPS. The smallest absolute drop is between 1440p Low (87.4 FPS) and 4K Low (58.3 FPS), a reduction of 29.1 FPS.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the GPU-bound nature of this combo. At Low settings, the transition from 1080p (119.2 FPS) to 1440p (87.4 FPS) represents a 26.7% reduction, while moving from 1440p to 4K (58.3 FPS) adds another 33.3% reduction. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 51.1%.
At High settings, the scaling is similar. From 1080p (76.5 FPS) to 1440p (55 FPS) is a 28.1% reduction, and from 1440p to 4K (38 FPS) is a 30.9% reduction. The total drop from 1080p High to 4K High is 50.3%.
These consistent percentage drops across settings indicate that the RTX 3060 Ti's rendering throughput, rather than the CPU, is the limiting component. If the Ryzen 9 9950X3D were the bottleneck, we would expect to see diminishing frame rate differences as resolution increases, since the CPU workload remains constant while GPU load grows. Instead, the proportional scaling suggests the GPU is saturated at all resolutions.
The 4K results, where even Low settings only reach 58.3 FPS, demonstrate that the 8 GB VRAM buffer and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for this game at ultra-high resolution. The combination of pixel count and texture memory demands exceed what the RTX 3060 Ti can deliver at playable frame rates.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p gaming, the Medium preset at 86.9 FPS provides the best balance of visual quality and performance. The jump from Medium to High only costs 10.4 FPS (86.9 to 76.5 FPS), which may be worth it for users prioritizing image quality. The Ultra preset at 65.9 FPS remains playable but offers diminishing returns over High.
At 1440p, the Low preset at 87.4 FPS is the only setting that consistently exceeds 60 FPS. Medium at 62.1 FPS is borderline acceptable, while High (55 FPS) and Ultra (49.6 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold. Users with 1440p displays should start at Medium and adjust downward if frame rates dip.
For 4K, the data does not support any preset for smooth gameplay. The best result is Low at 58.3 FPS, which is just below 60 FPS and may still feel playable in less demanding scenes. However, the Ultra preset at 34.4 FPS is not recommended for action sequences, where Control's physics-based combat requires responsive frame rates.
Across all resolutions, the Low-to-Medium transition offers the most efficient performance gain. The RTX 3060 Ti's mid-range positioning means that high-quality settings at 4K are out of reach, but the card handles 1080p and 1440p competently when settings are adjusted accordingly. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D's substantial processing power does not translate into higher frame rates in this configuration, confirming that the GPU is the definitive performance ceiling.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 58.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 42.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 87.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 62.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 49.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 119.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 86.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 76.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 65.9 |
Control with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 3060 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RTX 3060 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.