Control

Control, Remedy’s 2019 action-adventure, presents a demanding workload that scales steeply with resolution. Benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT show a configuration that is firmly GPU-limited at higher resolutions, yet capable of delivering smooth frame rates when settings are balanced. The data indicates a system that performs best at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K remains out of reach for consistent playability. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, the roles of the CPU and GPU, and how this specific pairing ranks against the broader database of tested combinations.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates reveal a pronounced performance drop as resolution increases, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p, the average FPS at High settings is 73, but this falls to 55 at 1440p and further to 37 at 4K. This represents a 24.7% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 49.3% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This steep decline indicates that the rendering pipeline is heavily dependent on the GPU’s pixel throughput, with the CPU having ample headroom at lower resolutions.

The data suggests that the limiting component shifts between resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s performance is more relevant, as seen by the relatively high frame rates. However, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck as pixel count increases. The gap between Low and Ultra settings also widens at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low (115 FPS) and Ultra (63 FPS) is 52 FPS. At 4K, that difference narrows to 27 FPS (59 FPS Low vs 32 FPS Ultra). This compression of the settings range at 4K is a classic sign of the GPU being fully saturated, where reducing graphical load yields diminishing returns.

Looking at the 1440p results, the pattern continues. The average FPS at Medium settings is 62, with a minimum of 53 and a maximum of 71. This is a more balanced point for this combo, as it offers a significant improvement over 4K while still maintaining a high level of visual fidelity. The 4K results for Medium settings (42 FPS average, 36-48 FPS range) are borderline playable but will likely suffer from frame pacing issues. The benchmark data clearly indicates that this GPU is not designed for 4K gaming, as even Low settings at 4K only achieve 59 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS target.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the primary driver of performance in this pairing, and its architecture and memory configuration dictate the results. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but it becomes a limiting factor at 4K where the demand for texture data and frame buffer memory increases substantially. The 8 GB capacity is also a factor at 4K, as some game assets may require more memory, though the benchmark data does not show a catastrophic failure, only reduced performance.

The GPU’s clock speeds are a key indicator of its performance ceiling. The base clock is 1605 MHz, with a game clock of 1755 MHz and a boost clock of 1905 MHz. The boost clock is the maximum achievable under ideal conditions, and the measured FPS suggests that the card is consistently operating near this level when GPU-bound. The GPU’s compute capabilities, measured at 9.754 TFLOPS FP32, are substantial for its generation but are outpaced by modern cards. The passmark G3D score of 16277 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, which indicates it is a mid-range performer.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in the database show a tight grouping. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M has a deltaPct of 0.1%, meaning the RX 5700 XT is essentially on par with it. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 are 0.3% behind, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 0.9% behind. This is a peculiar grouping, as the RTX 5090 D V2 is a modern flagship, but the average benchmark scores suggest that, in the database’s testing, the RX 5700 XT holds its own. This reinforces that the RX 5700 XT is a solid performer for its class.

The GPU’s thermal and power design, with a TDP of 225 W and a dual-slot cooler, is typical for its performance level. The power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) and suggested PSU of 550 W are standard for this era. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully utilized, and the 7 nm process node from TSMC helps with efficiency. The data shows a clear correlation between the GPU’s clock speeds and the measured FPS; higher resolutions and settings push the card to its limits, and the frame rates reflect that strain.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, and its role in this combo is to feed the GPU with data. With a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, it provides strong single-threaded performance, which is crucial for game logic and draw calls. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce latency, and the 5 nm process node from TSMC ensures high efficiency. The CPU’s benchmark scores reflect its capabilities, with a single-thread score of 1060 in 3dmark and a multicore score of 6879.

In this game, the CPU’s performance is not the primary bottleneck, as evidenced by the frame rates at 1080p. At Low settings, the 1080p average FPS is 115, which is well above the 60 FPS target. This suggests that the CPU can handle the game’s physics and AI at high frame rates. The CPU’s nearest rivals show a very tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K are both 0.2% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is 0.4% ahead. This indicates that the 7600X is perfectly positioned among its peers, with no significant advantage or disadvantage in raw processing power.

The CPU’s memory support for DDR5 and dual-channel bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s provides a fast pipe for data transfer. While the game does not appear to be heavily dependent on memory bandwidth, this configuration ensures that the CPU does not starve the GPU. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer high bandwidth for the GPU and other peripherals, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0. The CPU’s percentile rank of 79 against all CPUs indicates it is in the top quartile, and its average benchmark score of 27636 is competitive.

The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 32, which is a GPU-limited result. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates across all resolutions at a given setting. Instead, we see a clear scaling with resolution, which is a hallmark of GPU-bound performance. The CPU’s role is to provide consistent frame times, and the measured data suggests it does so effectively up to the point where the GPU becomes fully saturated.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 73.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 32, indicating it is not playable at this resolution and setting.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at 1440p and 4K. The frame rates scale with resolution, which is a sign of GPU-bound performance, while the CPU has enough headroom to sustain higher frame rates at 1080p.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 with Medium settings provides a good balance, with an average FPS of 62 and a minimum of 53, which is a playable experience.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 2767 out of 3720 tested combos, placing it in the lower-mid range of all tested systems.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is 52 FPS, with Low settings achieving 115 FPS and Ultra achieving 63 FPS at 1920x1080.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ranks 2767 out of 3720 tested combos in Control. This places it in the lower 25th percentile of all tested systems, indicating that it is not a high-end configuration for this specific game. The rank is a composite measure, and the data suggests that while the CPU is a strong performer, the GPU holds the system back. The GPU’s 59th percentile ranking against all GPUs is a more accurate indicator of its performance, and the combo’s rank reflects the GPU’s limitations in this demanding title.

The rank is influenced by the fact that many other combos feature more powerful GPUs. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU’s, which shows a clear imbalance in this pairing. For a more balanced system, a stronger GPU would be needed to match the CPU’s capabilities. The combo’s rank suggests that it is a mid-range build from a few generations ago, and it will struggle with modern titles at high resolutions. The data is measured, not estimated, which makes this rank a reliable indicator of real-world performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s performance across all settings and resolutions.

At 1920x1080:

• Low: Average FPS is 115.
• Medium: Average FPS is 82, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 94.
• High: Average FPS is 73.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 63.

At 2560x1440:

• Low: Average FPS is 87.
• Medium: Average FPS is 62, with a minimum of 53 and a maximum of 71.
• High: Average FPS is 55.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 48.

At 3840x2160:

• Low: Average FPS is 59.
• Medium: Average FPS is 42, with a minimum of 36 and a maximum of 48.
• High: Average FPS is 37.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 32.

This data shows a clear progression. The 1080p results are all playable, with even Ultra settings achieving 63 FPS. The 1440p results are mostly playable, with only Ultra dipping below the 50 FPS mark. The 4K results are not playable, with even Low settings struggling to maintain 60 FPS. The minimum FPS values, where available, show that frame pacing is relatively stable at Medium settings, but the lack of data for other settings suggests potential variability.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 with High settings. This provides an average FPS of 73, which is well above the 60 FPS target, and the visual quality is high. For players who prefer a higher frame rate, Low settings at 1080p achieve 115 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. Ultra settings at 1080p are also viable, with an average FPS of 63, but the marginal gain over High may not be worth the performance hit.

At 2560x1440, the recommended setting is Medium, which delivers an average FPS of 62 and a minimum of 53. This is the sweet spot for this resolution, as High settings (55 FPS) and Ultra settings (48 FPS) push the frame rate below the ideal threshold. Low settings at 1440p are also playable, with an average FPS of 87, but the reduction in visual fidelity is noticeable. For 4K, the data does not support a playable experience. Even Low settings only achieve 59 FPS, and the overall experience is likely to be inconsistent. It is recommended to stay at 1440p or 1080p for this combo.

The data indicates that the Medium preset offers the most stable frame times, as it is the only setting with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. This suggests a more predictable performance profile. The High preset is a good choice for 1080p, but for 1440p, Medium is the safest bet to avoid dips below 60 FPS. In summary, the combo is best utilized at 1080p High or 1440p Medium, with the understanding that 4K is not a viable option for this hardware.