Control

Control, Remedy’s 2019 action-adventure, remains a demanding showcase for physics and particle effects. The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 produces a spread of results that hinges heavily on resolution and preset selection, with the data revealing a clear performance hierarchy from 1080p to 4K. Benchmark analysis of the measured frames indicates that this combo is positioned in the 43rd percentile of tested configurations, ranking 1237 out of 2888 combos, suggesting a mid-pack standing that can be optimized through settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU combo in Control?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo consistently achieves frame rates above 80 FPS across all presets. At 2560x1440, average frame rates range from 62 FPS on Ultra to 113 FPS on Low, while 3840x2160 drops below 60 FPS on every setting except Low, which hits 76 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 perform relative to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26331 places it 1.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon 860M. It also trails the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 by 0.3% and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary by 0.8%, indicating a tightly clustered performance tier.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F a bottleneck for the RTX 5060 in this game?

A: The CPU’s percentile rank of 83 against all processors, combined with its 6-core, 12-thread configuration, suggests it provides ample headroom. The measured FPS scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (149 to 82 FPS) indicates the GPU is the primary limiter, as the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 aligns with mid-range desktop performance.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers an average of 113 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields 62 FPS. This represents a 45% reduction in frame rate, showing the significant cost of maxing out graphical features like ray tracing and volumetric lighting.

Q: Does the combo support modern upscaling technologies?

A: The RTX 5060 is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and includes 120 tensor cores, though the provided data does not specify DLSS frame generation or ray reconstruction performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes features like ray tracing, but the measured FPS numbers do not isolate upscaling effects.

Q: How consistent are frame times at 4K Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the combo produces an average of 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 and a maximum of 62 FPS. This 16 FPS variance indicates notable frame pacing fluctuations, making the experience less smooth than the 1080p Medium result, which shows a 32 FPS spread between its 90 and 122 FPS bounds.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the dominant factor in Control’s performance, given the game’s heavy reliance on GPU compute for physics and lighting. The card’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but appears strained at 4K. The measured data supports this: at 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 76 FPS on Low to 42 FPS on Ultra, a clear sign that the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth are being saturated by higher resolutions and preset complexity.

Clock speeds play a secondary role here, with the base clock of 2280 MHz and boost clock of 2497 MHz providing the raw throughput for the 3840 shading units. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 19.18 TFLOPS translates into strong raw rasterization, but Control’s unique particle and destruction systems demand more than just fill rate. The pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s are the specs that matter for this game’s debris and smoke effects, and the data shows these are adequate for 1440p Medium (80 FPS) but insufficient for 4K Ultra (42 FPS).

Comparing the RTX 5060 to its nearest rivals, the average benchmark score of 26331 shows it is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon 860M (26401, deltaPct -0.3%) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, deltaPct -0.3%). This clustering suggests that while the RTX 5060 is a capable mid-range card, it does not offer a significant synthetic advantage over these alternatives. However, in Control specifically, the GPU’s 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores may provide architectural benefits that are not reflected in raw benchmark scores, particularly for the game’s reflective surfaces and lighting effects.

The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking across all GPUs indicates it sits above the median but below high-end cards. In practice, this means the RTX 5060 can handle Control’s High preset at 1440p (71 FPS) and Medium at 1080p (106 FPS), but pushing to 4K requires dropping to Low settings (76 FPS) to maintain playable frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM is the likely culprit for the 4K Ultra deficit, as the game’s high-resolution textures and effects can exceed this capacity, leading to the observed 42 FPS average.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is a modern desktop processor that does not appear to be the limiting factor in Control. The CPU’s base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, combined with 32 MB of shared L3 cache, provide sufficient single-thread performance for the game’s logic and rendering tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and multi-core score of 21765 place it well above the requirements for this 2019 title, which was optimized for lower-core-count CPUs.

The processor’s 83rd percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750, shows it is a solid mid-to-upper-tier option. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, deltaPct 0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, deltaPct -0.2%), indicating that the 7400F is statistically tied with these alternatives in synthetic tests. For Control, this means the CPU can easily feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations, as evidenced by the FPS scaling across resolutions.

At 1080p, the FPS differences between presets (149 Low, 106 Medium, 94 High, 82 Ultra) are driven by the GPU’s workload, not CPU limitations. The CPU’s 12 threads handle the game’s background tasks without issue, and the 65W TDP indicates efficient power delivery that avoids thermal throttling. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while modest for DDR5, is sufficient for the game’s data streaming, as the GPU’s VRAM is the primary bottleneck at higher settings.

The CPU’s release date of 2025-01-08 and active production status mean it is a current-generation part, but its architecture (Zen 4, Raphael) is one generation behind the latest. In Control, this does not matter, as the game’s CPU demands are modest. The data shows that even at 4K Low, the combo achieves 76 FPS, which is a 58% improvement over 4K Ultra (42 FPS), indicating that the CPU maintains its performance ceiling while the GPU scales down.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. The Low preset averages 149 FPS, which is 40% higher than the Medium preset’s 106 FPS. High settings produce 94 FPS, while Ultra drops to 82 FPS, a 45% reduction from Low. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS, indicating a 32 FPS range that suggests some scene-dependent variance but remains highly playable throughout.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales predictably. Low settings yield 113 FPS, Medium drops to 80 FPS (with a 68-92 FPS range), High produces 71 FPS, and Ultra falls to 62 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 24% of performance on Low (149 to 113 FPS), but only 17% on Ultra (82 to 62 FPS), suggesting that the GPU’s pixel throughput is more stressed at lower settings where fill rate dominates.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates become marginal for smooth gameplay. Low settings average 76 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold, but Medium drops to 54 FPS (with a 46-62 FPS range), High falls to 48 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 42 FPS. The 4K results clearly show the GPU’s limits, with the 8 GB VRAM being a probable constraint, as the difference between Low (76 FPS) and Ultra (42 FPS) is a 45% performance penalty.

The data reveals that the combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, all presets exceed 80 FPS, making it a strong choice for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1440p, the Low and Medium presets are viable for competitive play, while High and Ultra are acceptable for single-player experiences. At 4K, only Low settings are playable, and even then, the 76 FPS average may dip in intense scenes, as the Medium preset’s minimum of 46 FPS demonstrates.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific configuration ranks 1237 out of 2888 tested combos in Control, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all CPU-GPU pairings. This mid-pack standing reflects the RTX 5060’s position as a mid-range GPU (72nd percentile) and the Ryzen 5 7400F’s solid but unspectacular CPU performance (83rd percentile). The rank suggests that while this combo is not a top-tier performer, it is far from a weak one, and its positioning is consistent with the hardware’s synthetic benchmark scores.

The combo’s rank is influenced by the game’s age and optimization. Control was released in 2019, and modern mid-range hardware can handle it well at lower resolutions. The 43rd percentile indicates that many higher-end combos (e.g., those with RTX 4070 or above) achieve better results, but the 7400F + 5060 combo outperforms a significant portion of the tested hardware pool. The nearest CPU rivals show a tight spread (deltaPct between -0.2% and 0.3%), meaning the processor choice has minimal impact on the overall ranking.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a similar clustering, with the RTX 5060’s average score of 26331 being within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. In Control, this means that swapping the GPU for one of these alternatives would likely produce similar FPS numbers at the same settings. The combo’s rank of 1237 is therefore more a function of the GPU tier than the specific CPU pairing.

It is notably the combo’s rank is based on measured data, not synthetic predictions. The measured FPS figures at 1080p High (94 FPS) and 1440p Medium (80 FPS) are solid mid-range results, and the ranking reflects that the combo is competitive but not exceptional. For users seeking higher rankings, upgrading the GPU would be the most effective path, as the CPU is already in the upper quartile of all processors.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the optimal choice. It delivers 106 FPS on average, with a minimum of 90 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even in action-heavy sequences. The 122 FPS maximum shows that the combo can push higher when the scene is less demanding, making this setting ideal for players who want a responsive experience without sacrificing too much graphical fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the recommended starting point, offering 113 FPS, which is 41% higher than the Medium preset’s 80 FPS. If visual quality is a priority, the High preset at 71 FPS is still playable, but the Medium preset’s 80 FPS is a better compromise for most users. The Ultra preset at 62 FPS is borderline, and the data suggests that the 68-92 FPS range of Medium provides a more consistent experience than the likely wider variance of Ultra.

For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only viable option, averaging 76 FPS. However, users should be cautious, as the Medium preset’s minimum of 46 FPS indicates that even Low may struggle in particle-heavy scenes. The data does not provide minimum FPS for Low, but the 45% performance gap between Low and Medium suggests that Low is the safest bet for 4K, though a 60 Hz display would be the practical limit.

The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution above 1080p, as it yields 82 FPS at 1080p but drops to 62 FPS at 1440p and 42 FPS at 4K. For players who want to experience Control’s full visual effects, the High preset at 1080p (94 FPS) is a better choice than Ultra at 1440p (62 FPS), as the former maintains high frame rates while still enabling most of the game’s advanced features. Ultimately, the combo’s sweet spot is 1080p Medium or High, with 1440p Low as a viable alternative for higher resolution.