Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 50 | 51 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 62 | 72 | 80 | 114 |
| 1080p Full HD | 83 | 97 | 103 | 147 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, with the GPU clearly carrying the load at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows a combination that ranks in the middle of the pack, offering a predictable performance curve that scales well with settings adjustments.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?*
A: The data shows 2560x1440 as the sweet spot. At High settings, it achieves 72.1 FPS, which is a solid 60+ FPS experience. At 1920x1080, performance is higher, but the 1440p results offer a better balance of visual fidelity and frame rate.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 2600 has an average benchmark score of 19616, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. It is essentially on par with the Intel Core i5-1345U (0.4% faster), the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (0.6% slower), and the Intel Core i7-10700F (0.7% slower). Its performance is nearly identical to these competing chips.
Q: How does the GPU stack up against its competition?
A: The RX 6750 XT holds an average benchmark score of 35327, placing it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, which is only 0.2% faster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 1.3% faster, making this a very competitive mid-range performer.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: The difference is significant. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 147.2 FPS, while the Ultra preset delivers 83.4 FPS. This is a difference of 63.8 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset demands substantially more from the hardware.
*Q: Can this combo handle 4K resolution in Control?*
A: Barely, and only at lower settings. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, it achieves 74.9 FPS. However, at High settings, it drops to 49.9 FPS, and at Ultra settings, it falls to 38.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested systems?
A: This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 793rd out of 1636 tested combos for Control. This places it squarely in the middle of the database, indicating a balanced but not top-tier configuration.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the dominant component in this pairing for Control. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the game's textures and assets. The GPU's high boost clock of 2600 MHz and game clock of 2495 MHz are key to its performance. The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. At 1080p, the GPU has headroom, but at 4K, its limits are exposed.
The GPU's relative strength is confirmed by its benchmark scores. Its PassMark G3D score of 20700 and its position in the 79th percentile of all GPUs indicate a strong mid-range part. The data shows it is virtually tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (0.2% faster) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (1.3% faster). This suggests the RX 6750 XT is a capable 1440p card, which is reflected in the measured FPS. At 2560x1440 with High settings, it delivers 72.1 FPS, and at 1080p with Ultra settings, it reaches 83.4 FPS. The GPU's performance scaling is clear: moving from High to Ultra at 1440p costs about 10 FPS, while moving from Medium to High at the same resolution yields a 8.2 FPS improvement.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides a solid foundation for the game. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz are adequate for feeding the GPU, but the data suggests it is not the primary performance driver in this configuration. The CPU's benchmark scores are competitive, but they do not single-handedly carry the system. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11186 and single-core score of 1579 place it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, like the Intel Core i5-1345U, are all within 0.7% of its average score, confirming its mid-range standing.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, where the GPU has more headroom, the CPU must work harder to maintain high frame rates. The measured 147.2 FPS at Low settings shows the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. However, the performance difference between Low and Medium at 1080p is just 43.9 FPS, while the difference between Medium and High is only 6.3 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is still the main limiting factor. The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support are sufficient for the game's demands, and its 65 W TDP means it won't cause thermal issues in most systems.
How This Combo Ranks
This pairing of the Ryzen 5 2600 and RX 6750 XT ranks 793rd out of 1636 tested combos in Control. This middle-of-the-pack ranking is a direct reflection of its component strengths. The GPU is a strong mid-range performer (79th percentile), while the CPU is a slightly older but still capable chip (77th percentile). The data shows a balanced system where neither component is severely bottlenecking the other, but neither is a top-tier part either.
The ranking implies that many other combinations, likely with newer CPUs or higher-end GPUs, will outperform this setup. However, the rank also means this combo sits above a significant portion of the tested database. The performance is not exceptional, but it is far from weak. The combination of a 6-core/12-thread CPU with a 12 GB GPU is a classic mid-range setup that delivers predictable results. The benchmark data suggests that for a user with a 1080p or 1440p monitor, this combo provides a very playable experience, which is consistent with its rank near the 50th percentile.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across resolutions and settings.
At 1920x1080, the combo is most comfortable. The Low preset delivers an average of 147.2 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. The Medium preset hits 103.3 FPS, and the High preset achieves 97 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still produces a very playable 83.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 43.4% drop in frame rate, but all presets remain above 60 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the performance is still strong. The Low preset reaches 113.7 FPS, which is excellent for a higher resolution. The Medium preset maintains 80.3 FPS, and the High preset delivers 72.1 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 61.8 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS target for most gamers. This resolution offers a great balance, with High settings providing a high-quality visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle. The Low preset is the only one to clear the 60 FPS mark, hitting 74.9 FPS. The Medium preset falls to 51.4 FPS, and the High preset drops to 49.9 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding just 38.5 FPS. At 4K, the game becomes a slideshow at higher settings, indicating this combo is not suited for 4K gaming in Control.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience, the data points to 2560x1440 with the High preset as the optimal configuration. This setting pair delivers 72.1 FPS, which is smooth and responsive, and the visual quality is significantly better than Low or Medium. The High preset at 1440p offers a 10.3 FPS improvement over the Ultra preset at the same resolution, making it a more stable choice.
If you prefer 1080p, the 1920x1080 with the High preset is the recommended choice. It provides 97 FPS, which is an excellent frame rate for competitive play, and it leaves headroom for more demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 1080p is also viable at 83.4 FPS, but the performance gain from High to Ultra is marginal compared to the performance cost.
For users who prioritize frame rate above all else, the 1920x1080 with the Low preset (147.2 FPS) or 2560x1440 with the Low preset (113.7 FPS) are the best options. These settings ensure maximum smoothness. However, the visual compromise is significant, and the game's atmosphere benefits greatly from higher settings. Therefore, the High preset at either 1080p or 1440p is the most practical recommendation, offering a strong balance of visual fidelity and performance.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 74.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 38.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 113.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 72.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 61.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 147.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 103.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 97.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 83.4 |
Control with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RX 6750 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.