Barony

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Radeon RX 6600 combination delivers a robust experience in Barony, a roguelike title released in 2015. The measured frame rates show high performance across most resolutions and settings, though the data also reveals clear performance ceilings. This analysis breaks down the CPU and GPU roles, frame rate scaling, and the practical settings recommendations based solely on the provided benchmark results.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, using the Cezanne codename. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. This CPU is built on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with a 65 W TDP. In the context of Barony, the CPU’s multi-threading capabilities appear to be sufficient, as the measured frame rates are consistently high, even at lower resolutions where CPU load typically becomes more prominent. The processor’s 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for game logic and asset streaming.

The benchmark data indicates that the Ryzen 5 5500 is not the primary bottleneck in most tested configurations. At 1080p with Low settings, the combination reaches 262 FPS, which suggests the CPU can handle the game’s single-threaded tasks effectively. However, the CPU’s performance relative to its rivals is modest. Its average benchmark score is 19593, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. It sits very close to the Intel Core i5-12500, which scores 19668, a delta of -0.4%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, which scores 19617, a delta of -0.1%. Conversely, it is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499) and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723).

In synthetic tests, the CPU’s single-thread performance is a key indicator for gaming. It scores 836 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2319 in cinebench_r23_singlecore. These scores, while not directly translating to in-game FPS, suggest that the CPU is capable of sustaining high frame rates when the GPU is not the limiting factor. The multi-core scores, such as 16429 in cinebench_r23_multicore and 19330 in passmark_multithread, show that it can handle background tasks without significantly impacting game performance. For Barony, which is a roguelike that may not utilize all 12 threads heavily, the CPU provides ample headroom.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achieved with this CPU and GPU combination in Barony?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 262, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-12500?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 has an average benchmark score of 19593, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-12500’s score of 19668.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 6600 outperform the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile in average benchmark scores?

A: Yes, the RX 6600 has an average benchmark score of 19036, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4050 Mobile’s score of 19049.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the combination drop below 60 FPS on average?

A: The only configuration with an average FPS below 60 is 3840x2160 (4K) with Ultra settings, which yields an average of 40 FPS.

Q: What is the frame rate range for the Medium settings preset at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 123, with a minimum of 105 FPS and a maximum of 142 FPS.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 6600 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 ranks 2885 out of 3717 tested combos in Barony. This placement, which is in the 22nd percentile of all combinations, indicates that while this setup delivers playable frame rates in many scenarios, there are a significant number of other hardware pairings that provide higher performance. The ranking suggests that this is not a top-tier configuration for the game, but rather a mid-range option.

This rank is influenced by the individual performance of both components. The CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs combine to place this specific pairing in the lower half of all tested combos. The data shows that the GPU is the more limiting factor in this pairing, as its percentile is lower than the CPU’s. The rank implies that users with this combo will get a solid experience at 1080p and 1440p, but will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings. The close proximity of the GPU’s rivals in benchmark scores, such as the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (deltaPct 0) and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (deltaPct 0.4%), further contextualizes its position in the overall performance hierarchy.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combination performs exceptionally well. With Low settings, the average FPS is 262. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 195 FPS, with a minimum of 166 and a maximum of 224. High settings yield an average of 168 FPS. Ultra settings reduce the average to 120 FPS. This demonstrates a linear scaling where each step up in settings costs a significant number of frames, but even at Ultra, the frame rate is well above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s limitations. Low settings produce an average of 166 FPS. Medium settings average 123 FPS, with a minimum of 105 and a maximum of 142. High settings average 106 FPS. Ultra settings drop to an average of 76 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 90 FPS, indicating that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count with less headroom. The minimum FPS for Medium (105) still exceeds the 60 FPS target, suggesting consistent smoothness.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the performance becomes more variable. Low settings average 87 FPS, which is still respectable. Medium settings average 64 FPS, with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74. High settings average 55 FPS. Ultra settings drop significantly to an average of 40 FPS. At this resolution, the combination struggles to maintain 60 FPS at High and Ultra settings. The minimum FPS of 55 at Medium settings indicates that even at this preset, there can be dips below the 60 FPS mark. The data clearly shows that 4K is the point where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a predictable pattern of performance degradation as pixel count increases. For Low settings, the average FPS drops from 262 at 1080p to 166 at 1440p, a 36.6% decrease. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops from 166 to 87, a 47.6% decrease. This shows that the GPU is being taxed more heavily at higher resolutions, as the CPU is likely not the limiting factor at these settings.

For Medium settings, the average FPS goes from 195 at 1080p to 123 at 1440p, a 36.9% decrease. From 1440p to 4K, it drops from 123 to 64, a 48.0% decrease. The pattern is similar, indicating that the GPU is the primary constraint. The High settings preset shows a 36.9% drop from 1080p (168 FPS) to 1440p (106 FPS), and a 48.1% drop from 1440p to 4K (55 FPS). Finally, Ultra settings show a 36.7% drop from 1080p (120 FPS) to 1440p (76 FPS), and a 47.4% drop from 1440p to 4K (40 FPS).

The consistency of these percentage drops across all settings presets is telling. The FPS loss from 1080p to 1440p is consistently around 36-37%, and from 1440p to 4K is consistently around 47-48%. This uniform scaling pattern strongly suggests that the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a smaller FPS drop at higher resolutions, as the CPU load would remain relatively constant while the GPU work increases. The data shows that the GPU’s rendering capabilities are being saturated, confirming that it is the primary constraint in this configuration.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and the user’s preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 120 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 168 FPS is also viable for users with high refresh rate monitors, but Ultra offers the best balance of performance and quality.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is recommended, yielding an average of 106 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with good visual detail. The Medium preset (123 FPS) is also acceptable, but High offers a noticeable improvement in visual quality for a relatively small FPS cost. The Ultra preset at 76 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced action, as it is closer to the 60 FPS boundary.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the only viable option for a playable experience, with an average of 64 FPS. However, the minimum FPS of 55 indicates that there will be occasional dips below 60 FPS. Users who prioritize a consistent frame rate may need to use the Low preset, which averages 87 FPS. The High and Ultra presets at 55 FPS and 40 FPS respectively are not recommended for a smooth experience. The data suggests that 4K gaming is only feasible with this combo at Medium or Low settings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the primary driver of the frame rate differences seen across resolutions and settings. It is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip and has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU’s boost clock is 2491 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz. It features 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. It is closely matched with its nearest rivals, showing a 0% deltaPct against the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030) and a -0.1% deltaPct against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049). This indicates that the RX 6600’s raw compute performance is competitive within its class.

In the context of Barony, the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is likely sufficient for the game’s textures and assets at 1080p and 1440p, but the frame rate drops at 4K suggest that the GPU’s raw rendering power, rather than VRAM capacity, is the limiting factor. The uniform FPS scaling across settings presets points to the GPU being the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 4K results, where even Medium settings dip to a 55 FPS minimum, highlight that the GPU’s 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is insufficient for the pixel workload at that resolution with high fidelity. Conversely, at 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom, allowing the CPU to push frame rates to 262 FPS at Low settings, indicating that the GPU is not the limiting factor in that scenario.