Archeage
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 156 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 51 | 74 | 108 | 123 |
| 1440p QHD | 87 | 129 | 189 | 212 |
| 1080p Full HD | 130 | 191 | 274 | 303 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Archeage with Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
ArcheAge is a 2014 MMORPG that remains demanding on modern hardware, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. This analysis examines the performance of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, based on measured FPS data. The combination ranks 1827 out of 2761 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the pack. The data reveals a system that is heavily influenced by both CPU and GPU capabilities depending on the resolution, with significant performance swings between the Low and Ultra presets.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in ArcheAge?
A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 is clearly the strongest resolution. At Medium settings, it achieves an average of 118 FPS, and at Low settings it reaches 132 FPS. While 2560x1440 is playable, with a 79 FPS average at Medium, 4K performance drops below the 60 FPS threshold at all settings, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the GPU perform at 4K Ultra settings?
A: The data indicates that 4K Ultra is the most demanding configuration tested, yielding an average FPS of just 21. This is a substantial drop from the 31 FPS average at 4K High and the 45 FPS at 4K Medium. The step from High to Ultra at 4K represents a roughly 32% reduction in frame rate, highlighting the high cost of the Ultra preset at this resolution.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX a strong CPU?
A: Yes, the benchmark data indicates it is a very capable processor. It holds a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35589, and its single-core score is 2204. It is within 0.7% of the performance of the Intel Xeon 6515P and slightly outperforms the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX by 0.6% in average benchmark score.
Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5060 have, and is it enough?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 comes with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus. With a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, it is sufficient for the measured settings, but the 8 GB capacity is a limiting factor for higher resolution textures. The data shows a clear performance drop as resolution increases, which is consistent with the GPU hitting memory or bandwidth limits.
Q: What is the performance delta between the RTX 5060 and its closest rivals?
A: Based on the provided data, the RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331. It is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon 860M, which is 0.3% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, also 0.3% faster. It performs 1.2% better than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which has an average score of 26011.
Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and High settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the measured data shows a significant difference. The Low preset achieves an average of 132 FPS, while the High preset achieves 80 FPS. This indicates that the High settings are substantially more demanding on the GPU, costing over 50 FPS compared to the Low preset.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the primary driver for visual fidelity in this configuration. Its performance, measured by a 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, is the bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU's characteristics, including its 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, dictate how the system scales with resolution.
The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution and settings increase, the GPU is pushed harder. At 1080p Low, the game runs at 132 FPS, suggesting the GPU has headroom. However, at 4K Ultra, the average FPS plummets to 21, indicating the GPU is fully saturated. The 21,900 million transistors and 3840 shading units are being tasked to their limit. The GPU's texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s are the theoretical limits that the measured FPS reflects.
The RTX 5060's nearest rivals in the benchmark database are the AMD Radeon 860M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, with performance deltas of -0.3% and -0.3% respectively. This places the RTX 5060 in a specific performance tier. The measured FPS in ArcheAge shows that this tier is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at mid-range settings, but it falls short of delivering a smooth experience at 4K with high or ultra presets. The GPU's boost clock of 2497 MHz and base clock of 2280 MHz are the operating frequencies that produce these results, and the data suggests that the 8 GB VRAM is a contributing factor to the performance cliff seen at 4K.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data illustrates a classic resolution scaling curve, with the CPU and GPU roles shifting as pixel count increases. The most telling comparison is at Medium settings across all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS is 118. Moving to 2560x1440, it drops to 79, a 33% decrease. At 3840x2160, the average FPS falls to 45, a 43% decrease from 1440p and a 62% decrease from 1080p.
This steep drop-off is a strong indicator that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The demand for pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth scales with resolution, and the RTX 5060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are not sufficient to maintain frame rates at 4K. The transition from 1080p to 1440p is the most manageable, with the system still achieving a playable 79 FPS at Medium. However, the jump to 4K is where the GPU's limitations become critical, as even the Low preset only manages an average of 51 FPS.
The scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution further confirms this. At 1080p, the gap between Low (132 FPS) and Ultra (54 FPS) is 78 FPS. At 1440p, the gap narrows to 52 FPS (89 vs 37). At 4K, the gap is only 30 FPS (51 vs 21). This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily constrained that even reducing settings yields diminishing returns, and the frame rate is largely bottlenecked by the GPU's raw throughput and memory subsystem. The data shows that the system is more balanced at 1440p, where the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, but at 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the primary constraint.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following data represents the exact measured FPS for this specific configuration.
3840x2160 (4K)
- Low: Average FPS of 51.
- Medium: Average FPS of 45, with a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 52.
- High: Average FPS of 31.
- Ultra: Average FPS of 21.
At 4K, the system is only playable at Low settings, and even then, it hovers around the 50 FPS mark. The Medium preset, with an average of 45 FPS, will feel sluggish. High and Ultra are not viable for smooth gameplay, with averages of 31 and 21 FPS respectively.
2560x1440 (1440p)
- Low: Average FPS of 89.
- Medium: Average FPS of 79, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91.
- High: Average FPS of 54.
- Ultra: Average FPS of 37.
1440p offers a much better experience. Low and Medium presets are both well above 60 FPS, providing smooth gameplay. High is playable but will have noticeable dips, and Ultra drops below 40 FPS, which is not ideal for an MMORPG where responsiveness matters.
1920x1080 (1080p)
- Low: Average FPS of 132.
- Medium: Average FPS of 118, with a minimum of 100 and a maximum of 135.
- High: Average FPS of 80.
- Ultra: Average FPS of 54.
1080p is where this combo shines. Low and Medium presets deliver very high frame rates, well over 100 FPS, making for an exceptionally smooth experience. High is also very playable at 80 FPS. The Ultra preset, while dropping to 54 FPS, is still technically playable but may not feel as fluid as the other settings.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a high-end mobile processor with 24 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 2.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its benchmark results are impressive, with a 94th percentile ranking. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 and single-core score of 2204 demonstrate its strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities.
Given the high core count and clock speeds, the CPU is likely not the primary bottleneck in most of the measured scenarios. The data shows that frame rates scale heavily with GPU settings and resolution, which typically points to a GPU limitation. The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU can produce high frame rates. For instance, at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 132, which is a high enough frame rate that the CPU's per-core performance becomes more critical in maintaining that level of performance.
The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is tight. It scores within 0.7% of the Intel Xeon 6515P and is 0.6% faster than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX in average benchmark score. This indicates that the 275HX is a top-tier processor. In ArcheAge, which can be CPU-intensive in crowded areas, the 24 cores and high boost clock should provide a solid foundation. The data suggests that the CPU has sufficient headroom to support the GPU, and the performance limits are found in the GPU's capabilities, especially at 4K.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate.
For 1920x1080, the Medium preset is the sweet spot. It delivers an average of 118 FPS, which is an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. The minimum FPS of 100 ensures there are no significant stutters. The High preset is also a strong choice if you prefer better visuals, as it still averages 80 FPS. The Low preset is unnecessary at this resolution, as it only serves to increase frame rates beyond the refresh rate of most monitors.
For 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the best recommendation. It provides an average of 79 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for playability. The minimum of 67 FPS indicates that it maintains a relatively stable experience. The High preset is borderline, with an average of 54 FPS, which may be acceptable for some players but is not consistently smooth. Low is also viable if you prioritize FPS, but Medium offers a more balanced experience.
For 3840x2160, the data suggests that this combo is not well-suited for high-quality 4K gaming. The Low preset is the only option that approaches playability, with an average of 51 FPS. However, it will not feel smooth. The Medium preset drops to 45 FPS, and High and Ultra are not recommended due to their low averages. If you have a 4K monitor, you would need to significantly lower in-game resolution scaling or accept a sub-60 FPS experience. The performance cliff between 1440p and 4K is steep, and the 8 GB VRAM of the RTX 5060 appears to be a contributing factor.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Archeage
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 74.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 108.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 123.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 87.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 129.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 189.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 212.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 130.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 191.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 274.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 303.0 |
Archeage with iUltra 9 275HX + Other GPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Archeage with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 275HX + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.