Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 80 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 37 | 49 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 63 | 83 | 109 |
| 1080p Full HD | 88 | 92 | 121 | 159 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
Thief, a 2014 stealth title, is not a demanding showcase for modern hardware, but the measured results for the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination reveal a clear performance hierarchy. This pairing ranks at 2438 out of 3720 tested combos, placing it in the 65th percentile of all system configurations evaluated for this game. The data indicates that this combo is positioned in the upper-midrange tier for Thief, with the GPU being the primary factor limiting performance at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom at lower settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 2438 out of 3720 tested configurations places it firmly in the middle of the pack, but the raw scores tell a more nuanced story. The data shows that this system is more than capable of delivering smooth gameplay, but its overall standing is pulled down by the RTX 5060's performance at the most demanding settings. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26331 and its 72nd percentile ranking against all GPUs suggest that it is a competent, mid-range performer. However, within the context of Thief specifically, the combination of the RTX 5060 and the Core Ultra 9 275HX produces results that are competent but not exceptional, especially when compared to the most powerful rigs that dominate the top of the rankings.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 67469 and its 94th percentile ranking against all CPUs demonstrate that the processor is a high-end component. The nearest rivals to the CPU, such as the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (deltaPct -0.3) and AMD EPYC 4484PX (deltaPct -0.5), have nearly identical average scores, indicating that the 275HX is at the top of its class. This strong CPU performance is the reason the combo ranks as high as it does; in a game like Thief, which is not heavily threaded, the CPU's power ensures that it is rarely the bottleneck. Therefore, the combo's rank is a reflection of the GPU's mid-range capabilities being the limiting factor, preventing this otherwise potent pairing from reaching a higher position.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the defining component in this combo, and its specifications dictate the performance envelope. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 2280 MHz, with a boost clock of 2497 MHz. These numbers are crucial for understanding the frame rates in Thief. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is powerful enough to handle the game at high settings at 1080p and 1440p, but it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K, especially on the Ultra preset.
The GPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database are the AMD Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3), NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.3), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (deltaPct -0.8). These comparisons show that the RTX 5060's average score is closely matched with these other cards, but its performance in Thief is what matters here. The data shows that the GPU's compute capabilities, as evidenced by its Passmark G3D score of 20891, are sufficient for the game's DirectX 11-era rendering. The 8 GB memory capacity is not a limiting factor in Thief, as the game's textures are not large enough to exceed this at any of the tested settings. The GPU's raw throughput, however, is what dictates the frame rates, and the data shows that it is the primary constraint when moving to higher resolutions and quality presets.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo in Thief varies by resolution. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers an average of 121 FPS, with a minimum of 103 FPS and a maximum of 139 FPS. This is a highly playable and smooth experience. The Low preset pushes the average to 159 FPS, but the Medium preset offers a substantial visual quality improvement for a relatively small performance hit. The High preset at 1080p drops to 92 FPS, which is still smooth, but the Ultra preset at 88 FPS provides diminishing returns in visual fidelity for a 33 FPS loss compared to Medium.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, yielding an average of 83 FPS (min 71, max 95). This provides a good balance between visual quality and performance. The High preset at 63 FPS is also acceptable for players who prefer higher fidelity, but it is closer to the edge of what is considered a smooth experience. The Low preset at 109 FPS is very fast, but the visual downgrade is significant. The Ultra preset at 60 FPS is the minimum for a playable experience, but the data suggests that Medium is the "sweet spot" for this resolution. At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more constrained. The Low preset is the only option that provides a consistently smooth experience, with an average of 64 FPS. The Medium preset at 49 FPS is a borderline experience, and the High and Ultra presets at 37 FPS and 35 FPS, respectively, are not recommended for smooth gameplay. Therefore, the data strongly suggests that for the best overall experience, users should target Medium settings at 1440p or 1080p, and Low settings if they insist on 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the combo performs across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are: Low 159 FPS, Medium 121 FPS (min 103, max 139), High 92 FPS, and Ultra 88 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a clear performance scaling, with a 71 FPS difference between the lowest and highest presets. The minimum FPS data for Medium shows that the frame rate can dip to 103 FPS, which is still well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. This indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor here, as the CPU can easily feed it frames at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop to: Low 109 FPS, Medium 83 FPS (min 71, max 95), High 63 FPS, and Ultra 60 FPS. The performance hit from increasing the resolution is significant, with the Medium preset losing 38 FPS compared to 1080p. The minimum FPS of 71 for Medium is still acceptable, but the High and Ultra presets are now approaching the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low 64 FPS, Medium 49 FPS (min 41, max 56), High 37 FPS, and Ultra 35 FPS. This resolution is clearly too demanding for the RTX 5060 to handle with high-quality settings. The 4K Low preset is the only one that remains consistently playable, and the Medium preset's minimum of 41 FPS shows that the system can stutter under load. The data clearly shows that the GPU's bandwidth and raw compute power are insufficient for 4K gaming in Thief with this combo.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals that the GPU is the primary limiting component in this combo. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 121 at 1080p to 83 at 1440p, a decrease of 38 FPS (or approximately 31%). At 4K, the average FPS at Medium settings drops to 49, which is a further decrease of 34 FPS from 1440p (or approximately 41%). This steep decline in performance as resolution increases indicates that the rendering load is outpacing the GPU's capabilities. The RTX 5060's 8 GB memory buffer and 128-bit bus, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p, become a bottleneck at 4K, as the pixel throughput demands are significantly higher.
This pattern is consistent across all settings. For example, at Low settings, the FPS drops from 159 at 1080p to 109 at 1440p, and then to 64 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is roughly 60%, which is a large performance hit. The data suggests that the CPU, with its 24 cores and high boost clock of 5.40 GHz, is not the limiting factor in this scenario. The Core Ultra 9 275HX provides more than enough processing power to handle the game's logic and draw calls, even at lower resolutions. The consistent and predictable FPS drops that correlate directly with resolution increases point squarely at the GPU as the bottleneck. The system is effectively GPU-bound at all settings, but the degree to which it is GPU-bound becomes more pronounced as the resolution increases.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a high-end mobile processor that provides an immense amount of computational headroom for Thief. With 24 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 2.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, the CPU is overqualified for a game released in 2014. Its benchmark scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 and Geekbench single-core score of 2458, place it in the top 6% of all CPUs. The data shows that in Thief, the CPU is never the bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 159 FPS, which is likely near the game's engine limit. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU with enough data, and the 275HX does this with ease.
The CPU's high single-thread performance is particularly relevant for Thief, as this game generation relies heavily on a few main threads. The 275HX's Passmark single-thread score of 4713 ensures that these threads are processed quickly, minimizing any potential CPU-related frame drops. The nearest CPU rivals, the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and AMD EPYC 4484PX, have nearly identical average scores, but the 275HX's architecture and clock speeds make it a superb companion for the RTX 5060. In essence, the CPU is a heavyweight champion that is being asked to do a lightweight job. The measured FPS data confirms this, as the performance scaling is almost entirely dictated by the GPU's capabilities as settings and resolutions increase. The CPU's contribution is to ensure that the GPU is never starved for data, allowing the RTX 5060 to operate at its maximum potential.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 109.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 83.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 63.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 60.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 159.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 121.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 92.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 88.0 |
Thief with iUltra 9 275HX + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 275HX + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.