Archeage
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 59 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 20 | 30 | 42 | 48 |
| 1440p QHD | 34 | 47 | 72 | 77 |
| 1080p Full HD | 47 | 73 | 104 | 118 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Archeage with Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-14700K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 pairing produces a highly variable experience in Archeage, one that depends almost entirely on the resolution and quality preset selected. The data shows a system capable of excellent performance at 1080p with lower settings, but one that struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with maximum quality. This analysis breaks down the measured results, placing them in context against the CPU's and GPU's benchmark standings and the combo's overall rank.
FAQ
Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combination for Archeage?
A: The combo ranks 1378 out of 1727 tested combinations in the database.
Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700K compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The i7-14700K's average benchmark score of 70074 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70104) and AMD EPYC 9115 (69887). It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (70420) and 1.4% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71056).
Q: What is the best measured average FPS for this combo at 1920x1080?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves its highest measured average of 118.3 FPS.
Q: Is there a resolution where the combo fails to maintain 30 FPS on High settings?
A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS drops to 29.8, which is below the 30 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the GPU's benchmark percentile compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 sits in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 25235 is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon 890M (25246), the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (25287), the AMD Radeon RX 6700M (25180), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (25120).
Q: What is the difference in measured performance between 1080p and 4K on Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate drops from 46.8 FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra to 20.2 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra, a decline of 26.6 FPS.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the primary variable in this pairing's performance. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The card operates at a base clock of 1626 MHz and can boost up to 2491 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz. This memory configuration and clock speed profile are the key determinants of frame rate, especially as resolution scales.
The data indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. For example, at 2560x1440, the difference between Low (77.3 FPS) and Medium (71.8 FPS) settings is a modest 5.5 FPS, suggesting that the GPU has sufficient headroom. However, moving from High (46.8 FPS) to Ultra (33.8 FPS) at the same resolution shows a much more significant 13 FPS penalty, indicating that the more demanding Ultra preset quickly saturates the GPU's capabilities.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations are stark. The measured 29.8 FPS on High and 20.2 FPS on Ultra demonstrate that the RX 6600's memory bandwidth and compute power are insufficient for smooth gameplay at this resolution with demanding settings. The fact that the GPU's benchmark score (25235) places it in the 69th percentile, and its closest rival is the integrated AMD Radeon 890M, reinforces that this is a mid-range part that will be challenged by high-resolution gaming.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the combo performs admirably, with even the High preset delivering 73.2 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the High preset drops to 46.8 FPS, a 26.4 FPS reduction. This is a significant drop, but the system remains playable. The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even more punishing, with the High preset falling further from 46.8 FPS to 29.8 FPS.
This scaling behavior strongly suggests that the system is GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong benchmark scores, including a Passmark multithread score of 52392 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44534, indicate it is not the bottleneck in this scenario. The i7-14700K is a high-end processor, and its performance is more than sufficient to feed the GPU. The frame rate drops are therefore attributable to the RX 6600's inability to handle the increased pixel count.
The data shows that Low settings scale more favorably. At 1920x1080 Low (118.3 FPS) to 2560x1440 Low (77.3 FPS) is a 41 FPS drop, but the absolute performance remains high. At 3840x2160 Low, the system still manages 48 FPS, which is playable. This indicates that if a user wants to play at 4K, they must drastically reduce visual quality to achieve a playable frame rate, underscoring the GPU's role as the primary constraint.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Archeage, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700K and AMD Radeon RX 6600 holds a rank of 1378 out of 1727. This places it in the lower portion of the ranking, indicating that while it is not the worst-performing combo, it is far from the top tier. The rank is a holistic measure that likely accounts for performance across all tested resolutions and settings.
The CPU's high percentile ranking (96th for the i7-14700K) does not translate to a high combo rank, which further confirms that the GPU is the determining factor. The i7-14700K is a top-tier processor, but its capabilities are not fully utilized in this context. The RX 6600, sitting in the 69th percentile, is a more modest performer. The disparity between the CPU's and GPU's performance levels creates an imbalance that holds the combo's overall rank down.
This rank of 1378 out of 1727 suggests that in the context of Archeage specifically, there are many other combinations of hardware that deliver a better overall experience. The data implies that the powerful CPU is being held back by the GPU, resulting in a system that is less competitive than its individual components might suggest.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following is the complete set of measured average FPS data for this combo.
1920x1080
- Low: 118.3 FPS
- Medium: 103.5 FPS
- High: 73.2 FPS
- Ultra: 46.8 FPS
2560x1440
- Low: 77.3 FPS
- Medium: 71.8 FPS
- High: 46.8 FPS
- Ultra: 33.8 FPS
3840x2160
- Low: 48 FPS
- Medium: 42.4 FPS
- High: 29.8 FPS
- Ultra: 20.2 FPS
At 1080p, the performance is robust. The gap between Low and Medium is 14.8 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 30.3 FPS. This shows that the High preset is a significant step up in load. The Ultra preset at 1080p delivers 46.8 FPS, which is the same score as the High preset at 1440p, illustrating how resolution and settings trade off against each other.
The 1440p data shows a more compressed range. Low and Medium are close, but High and Ultra take progressively larger hits. This suggests that at this resolution, the GPU is beginning to run out of resources. The 4K data is uniformly low. Even the Low preset at 48 FPS is the best result, and it falls below 30 FPS on High. The Ultra preset at 20.2 FPS is the worst measured score, indicating that this setting and resolution combination is not viable for this hardware.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's resolution and performance target.
For a target of 60 FPS at 1920x1080, the High preset (73.2 FPS) is the best choice, as it provides a solid balance of visual quality and performance. The Medium preset (103.5 FPS) is also an option for users who prioritize higher frame rates, but High offers a better visual experience while still maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.
At 2560x1440, achieving 60 FPS is not possible with High settings (46.8 FPS). The Medium preset (71.8 FPS) is the only option that breaks the 60 FPS barrier. For users who prefer higher visual fidelity, the High preset at 46.8 FPS is playable but will not be as smooth. The Ultra preset (33.8 FPS) is only suitable for users who are comfortable with lower frame rates.
At 3840x2160, 60 FPS is out of reach. The Low preset (48 FPS) is the only setting that provides a consistently playable experience. The Medium preset (42.4 FPS) is also an option for those who want slightly better visuals. The High preset (29.8 FPS) and Ultra preset (20.2 FPS) are not recommended for general gameplay as they fall below the 30 FPS playability threshold.
The data indicates that the best overall experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 with the High preset. This configuration delivers a high frame rate that is well above the 60 FPS target, and the visual quality is strong. Users with 1440p monitors should use the Medium preset to maintain smooth performance, while those with 4K displays will need to use Low settings. The Ultra preset is generally not recommended at any resolution above 1080p due to its significant performance cost.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700K
AMD Radeon RX 6600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700K + AMD Radeon RX 6600 in Archeage
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 48.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 42.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 20.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 77.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 71.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 46.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 33.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 118.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 103.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 73.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 46.8 |
Archeage with ii7-14700K + Other GPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Archeage with RX 6600 + Other CPUs
See how Archeage performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700K + RX 6600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.