Archeage

The Intel Core i5-13400F pairs a 10-core, 16-thread configuration with a 2.50 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clock. In Archeage, this CPU’s single-thread performance is the primary driver for frame pacing, as the game’s MMO engine relies heavily on a few fast cores for game logic and player position updates. The benchmark data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p Low, the system achieves 145 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU well beyond typical monitor refresh rates in light scenes. The CPU’s 20 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed game data close, reducing memory latency in crowded areas. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13400F scores an average of 25236, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9474F, but 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D. This puts the processor in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it sits comfortably above the median for handling the simulation-heavy tasks Archeage throws at it. The 3DMark single-thread score of 960 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3004 both corroborate that the chip’s architecture is well-suited for the game’s frame-by-frame decision making. While the CPU has 10 cores, Archeage rarely utilizes all of them; the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 versus the 8-thread score of 5591 shows scaling exists, but the game’s benefit from extra threads is marginal compared to raw clock speed.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The i5-13400F’s core layout is a hybrid of performance and efficiency, but the benchmark results indicate that Archeage primarily taxes the high-frequency performance cores. The base clock of 2.50 GHz is a floor, but the 4.60 GHz boost is where the game spends most of its time during intense combat. The data shows that the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3634 is robust, and this translates to the 145 FPS result seen at 1080p Low, where the GPU is not the bottleneck. When moving to higher settings, the CPU’s role shifts; at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 58.4 FPS, but this is a GPU limitation, not a CPU one. The CPU’s 16 threads handle background tasks and game audio without stuttering, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 25032. In MMO settings with dozens of players on screen, the CPU’s ability to process network packets and game states is critical. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1880 is particularly relevant, as it shows the CPU can handle two heavily loaded threads efficiently, which is a common scenario in Archeage’s main cities. The processor’s 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms it is not a weak link in this combination, and the data suggests it will not hold back the RTX 2070 SUPER in most scenarios.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is the component that determines the visual ceiling for Archeage at higher settings. The GPU’s base clock of 1605 MHz and boost clock of 1770 MHz are modest by modern standards, but the Turing architecture’s 2560 shading units provide enough raw compute for a 2014 title. The benchmark results show a clear GPU bottleneck at Ultra settings: at 1440p Ultra, the system only manages 37.8 FPS, while at 1080p Ultra it reaches 58.4 FPS. This indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s is strained by Archeage’s Ultra preset, which likely includes heavy anti-aliasing and shadow effects. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, as the 4K High result of 34.4 FPS suggests the card is not running out of memory, but rather hitting compute limits. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 18169 places it in the 65th percentile, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A400, scores 0.5% higher. In practical terms, the RTX 2070 SUPER is a capable 1080p and 1440p card for this game, but 4K Ultra is not viable, with only 20.7 FPS. The 12 nm process node and 215 W TDP are historical details, but the performance data shows the card is aging gracefully for older MMOs.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate scaling across resolutions reveals a predictable shift in bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system produces 145 FPS, which is more than double the 57.9 FPS at 4K Low. This steep drop is classic GPU-bound behavior, as the RTX 2070 SUPER must render four times the pixels at 4K compared to 1080p. The data for Medium settings shows a similar trend: 128.6 FPS at 1080p, 82.4 FPS at 1440p, and 46.7 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is roughly a 36% reduction in FPS, while from 1440p to 4K it is a 43% reduction, indicating the GPU is becoming increasingly saturated. At High settings, the pattern holds, with 88.7 FPS at 1080p, 58.2 FPS at 1440p, and 34.4 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, showing 58.4 FPS at 1080p, 37.8 FPS at 1440p, and 20.7 FPS at 4K. This scaling analysis confirms that the CPU is not the limiting factor at higher resolutions; the i5-13400F can maintain high frame rates even at 1080p Low, where the GPU has the least work. The data implies that users with 1080p monitors can push settings higher without sacrificing smoothness, while 4K users must drop to Low to approach playable frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the RTX 2070 SUPER and i5-13400F combination delivers a wide range of performance depending on the preset. Low settings produce 145 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play or high-refresh monitors. Medium settings still offer a very smooth 128.6 FPS, while High drops to 88.7 FPS, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra is the outlier at 58.4 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decline proportionally. Low settings yield 95.8 FPS, granting a solid experience for most monitors. Medium brings 82.4 FPS, and High falls to 58.2 FPS, which is right at the edge of smoothness. Ultra at 1440p is 37.8 FPS, which is noticeably choppy. At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles to keep up. Low settings manage 57.9 FPS, which is just playable, but Medium drops to 46.7 FPS, High to 34.4 FPS, and Ultra to 20.7 FPS, which is not a viable gaming experience. The data shows that the sweet spot for this combo is 1080p Medium to High, with 1440p Low to Medium being acceptable alternatives. The 4K results are only usable on Low settings, and even then, the frame rate is below the 60 FPS target.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Archeage?

A: Based on the measured FPS, 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution. At 1080p Medium, the system achieves 128.6 FPS, and at 1080p High it reaches 88.7 FPS, both of which are well above the 60 FPS threshold. 1440p is also viable with Low (95.8 FPS) or Medium (82.4 FPS) settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Archeage?

A: The data shows 4K gaming is only possible at Low settings, where the system produces 57.9 FPS. Medium (46.7 FPS), High (34.4 FPS), and Ultra (20.7 FPS) are below playable thresholds. Users should stick to 1080p or 1440p for a better experience.

Q: How does the i5-13400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236. It is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.5% faster than the AMD EPYC 9474F. It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D by 0.5%, which is a negligible difference in real-world gaming.

Q: Is the RTX 2070 SUPER a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: At 1080p Low, the system hits 145 FPS, suggesting the CPU is the limiting factor. However, at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate drops to 58.4 FPS, indicating the GPU becomes the bottleneck as settings increase. The shift happens somewhere between Medium and High settings.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, Low settings produce 95.8 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 37.8 FPS. This is a 58 FPS difference, or roughly 60% lower performance, showing the heavy impact of the Ultra preset on the GPU.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER stack up against its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 22206. It is 0.5% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A400 and 2.3% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. It outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 5700 by 2.5% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 0.9%.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data points to a clear recommendation for different priorities. For maximum frame rate and competitive play, the Low preset at 1080p (145 FPS) is the top choice, offering a very responsive experience. For a balance of visual quality and smoothness, the Medium preset at 1080p (128.6 FPS) or 1440p (82.4 FPS) is the best all-around option, as it maintains high frame rates while improving graphics fidelity over Low. The High preset at 1080p (88.7 FPS) is also excellent, providing a significant visual upgrade over Medium with only a moderate FPS hit. Users with 1440p monitors should consider High (58.2 FPS) if they prioritize visuals over a strict 60 FPS lock, but Medium is safer for consistent smoothness. The Ultra preset is not recommended for this combination. At 1080p it only yields 58.4 FPS, and at 1440p it drops to 37.8 FPS, making it a poor trade-off for the visual gains. For 4K users, only Low settings (57.9 FPS) are worth using, and even then, the experience is marginal. The data suggests the optimal experience is 1080p High, as it provides a strong balance of image quality and performance without pushing the GPU to its limits.