Allods Online

# Allods Online with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + Intel Arc B390

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a sharply tiered performance curve in Allods Online, where the integrated graphics solution becomes the dominant constraint at higher resolutions while the six-core CPU demonstrates sufficient headroom at 1080p. Benchmark data shows this combination ranks 2459th out of 2775 tested configurations, placing it in the lower percentile of systems, yet the measured frame rates reveal that playable performance is achievable with careful settings management. The Arc B390, operating as an integrated GPU with system-shared memory, delivers a narrow performance envelope that expands considerably when resolution drops, while the Ryzen 5 2600's twelve threads provide consistent support across all tested presets.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a pronounced resolution sensitivity that clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 120 FPS average, but this drops to 75 FPS at 1440p Low and further to 39 FPS at 4K Low — a reduction of 37.5% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and an additional 48% decline when stepping up to 4K. This scaling pattern indicates that the Arc B390's rendering throughput, rated at 7.680 TFLOPS FP32, simply cannot sustain the pixel workload as resolution increases, even with minimal graphical demands.

The Medium preset follows a similar trajectory: 94 FPS at 1080p, 59 FPS at 1440p, and 31 FPS at 4K. The delta between 1080p and 1440p here is 37.2%, nearly identical to the Low preset's drop, suggesting that the resolution penalty is largely independent of settings within this range. High settings show 59 FPS at 1080p, 37 FPS at 1440p, and 19 FPS at 4K, with the 4K result falling below the threshold for comfortable gameplay. Ultra settings produce the steepest degradation: 37 FPS at 1080p, 23 FPS at 1440p, and just 12 FPS at 4K — the latter representing a 67.6% loss relative to 1080p Ultra.

This consistent halving of frame rates with each resolution step-up points to a fill-rate limitation rather than a CPU constraint. The Ryzen 5 2600's 3.90 GHz boost clock and six cores are not the limiting factor here, as evidenced by the fact that even at 4K Low the system only manages 39 FPS, a figure that would be significantly higher if the processor were the bottleneck. The 4K Medium frame time data, with a minimum of 26 FPS and maximum of 36 FPS against an average of 31 FPS, shows only modest variance, indicating steady GPU-bound behavior rather than CPU-induced stuttering.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the decisive component in this configuration, and its specifications explain the observed performance ceiling. Built on the Xe3-LPG architecture with a 3 nm process, this integrated GPU features 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. The 2500 MHz boost clock provides the computational foundation, but the memory configuration is the critical limitation: the Arc B390 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning it competes with the CPU for the Ryzen 5 2600's dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. This shared-memory arrangement inherently caps performance in memory-intensive scenarios, which partially explains why the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482 places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs.

The nearest rivals for the Arc B390 are all legacy NVIDIA parts: the GeForce GT 520MX with a score of 1463 (1.3% slower), the GeForce 800M at 1460 (1.5% slower), the GeForce GT 625 OEM at 1446 (2.5% slower), and the GeForce GT 710 at 1443 (2.7% slower). This positioning clarifies that the Arc B390, despite being a modern 2026 release, delivers performance comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs from over a decade ago. The 60.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 120.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide the raw throughput that drives the measured frame rates, but these figures are modest by contemporary standards.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure that Allods Online, a 2010 title, has no API-level obstacles, but the hardware simply lacks the fill-rate headroom for high-resolution gaming. The 80 W TDP and IGP slot width confirm this is an integrated solution designed for efficiency rather than absolute performance, and the 12 RT cores, while present, are irrelevant for this MMORPG's rendering workload. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system reaches 120 FPS, which represents the practical ceiling for this GPU in this game, and any increase in resolution or settings immediately exposes the hardware's limitations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 provides a stable foundation that does not become the limiting factor in any tested configuration. With six cores and twelve threads running at a 3.40 GHz base clock and 3.90 GHz boost clock, this 2018 processor delivers sufficient computational power for Allods Online's MMO workload, which typically involves modest physics and AI calculations alongside rendering. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 96 KB L1 cache per core provide adequate data locality for the game's assets, while the dual-channel DDR4 memory with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth feeds both the CPU and the integrated GPU.

The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate its mid-range positioning: a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1248 and singlecore score of 157.3, a Geekbench multicore score of 5648 and singlecore score of 1154, and a Passmark multithread score of 13160. These figures place the Ryzen 5 2600 in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21484. The nearest rivals highlight the processor's standing: the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V scores 21440 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367 (0.5% lower), the Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635 (0.7% higher), and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223 (1.2% lower). This clustering shows that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs competitively with far more modern processors in synthetic benchmarks, though its age shows in single-threaded tasks.

The 65 W TDP and 12 nm process node from GlobalFoundries represent an older manufacturing approach, but for Allods Online, the CPU's twelve threads ensure that background processes and game logic do not interfere with frame delivery. The evidence for CPU adequacy comes from the resolution scaling: if the processor were the bottleneck, frame rates would remain constant across resolutions, but the data shows sharp declines from 1080p to 1440p to 4K. At 1080p Low, the 120 FPS result approaches the practical limit for this GPU, and the CPU's 2239 Passmark single-thread score suggests it can handle the game's primary thread without issue. The processor's 75th percentile ranking confirms that it is not the weak link in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: Why does the frame rate drop so dramatically from 1080p to 4K?

A: The Intel Arc B390's rendering capabilities, measured at 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 and a 60.00 GPixel/s pixel rate, cannot sustain the increased pixel workload at higher resolutions. The data shows a 67.5% reduction from 1080p Low (120 FPS) to 4K Low (39 FPS), confirming that the GPU is the limiting component rather than the CPU.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 strong enough for this game?

A: Yes, the CPU shows no signs of bottlenecking in the measured results. The 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21484, places it well ahead of the GPU's 9th percentile standing. The consistent frame-rate drops across resolutions indicate the GPU is the constraint.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination?

A: The 1080p resolution provides the only playable frame rates across all settings, with Low achieving 120 FPS, Medium 94 FPS, and High 59 FPS. At 1440p, only Low (75 FPS) and Medium (59 FPS) reach acceptable levels, while 4K results range from 12 to 39 FPS depending on settings.

Q: How does the Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B390's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482 places it 1.3% ahead of the GeForce GT 520MX, 1.5% ahead of the GeForce 800M, 2.5% ahead of the GeForce GT 625 OEM, and 2.7% ahead of the GeForce GT 710. This indicates it performs at the level of entry-level discrete GPUs from past generations.

Q: Does the system-shared memory affect performance?

A: The Arc B390 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning it shares the Ryzen 5 2600's dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s. This configuration limits memory-intensive operations and contributes to the GPU's performance ceiling, as evidenced by the 9th percentile ranking.

Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings?

A: Ultra settings are only marginally playable at 1080p with 37 FPS average, and become increasingly problematic at higher resolutions: 23 FPS at 1440p and 12 FPS at 4K. The Medium preset offers a better balance, with 94 FPS at 1080p and 59 FPS at 1440p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its strongest performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 120 FPS, which represents the highest measured frame rate for this configuration. Medium settings achieve 94 FPS with a minimum of 80 FPS and maximum of 108 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery. High settings drop to 59 FPS average, still playable but noticeably lower, while Ultra settings yield 37 FPS, which approaches the lower boundary of acceptable gameplay for an MMORPG.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance penalty becomes apparent. Low settings maintain 75 FPS average, a 37.5% reduction from 1080p. Medium settings deliver 59 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS and maximum of 68 FPS, matching the 1080p High result. High settings fall to 37 FPS, which is marginal for smooth play, and Ultra settings drop to 23 FPS, making the game feel sluggish. The Medium preset at 1440p represents the best balance for users who prioritize resolution over maximum visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the integrated GPU's limitations are fully exposed. Low settings produce 39 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target most players expect, while Medium settings average 31 FPS with a minimum of 26 FPS and maximum of 36 FPS. High settings drop to 19 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 12 FPS, rendering these configurations impractical for actual gameplay. The 4K results clearly indicate that this resolution is beyond the Arc B390's capabilities, regardless of settings.

The frame time consistency at Medium settings provides additional insight: at 1080p, the 80-108 FPS range around a 94 FPS average shows a 29.8% variance, while at 1440p, the 50-68 FPS range around a 59 FPS average shows a 30.5% variance, and at 4K, the 26-36 FPS range around a 31 FPS average shows a 32.3% variance. This consistent variance pattern suggests the GPU's rendering pipeline produces similar frame pacing characteristics across resolutions, with the absolute performance level being the primary differentiator.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data supports a clear hierarchy of playable configurations for this hardware combination. At 1080p, the Medium preset offers the optimal balance: 94 FPS average provides smooth gameplay while maintaining visual quality above the minimum settings. The 80 FPS minimum ensures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. Players who prioritize frame rate above all else can select Low settings for 120 FPS, but the Medium preset's additional visual features justify the 26 FPS reduction.

For users with 1440p displays, the Low preset at 75 FPS is the recommended choice, as it maintains playability while allowing the higher resolution. The Medium preset at 59 FPS is acceptable for players who prefer visual quality and can tolerate occasional dips to 50 FPS, but the margin for error is thin. High and Ultra settings at this resolution produce 37 FPS and 23 FPS respectively, which are not recommended for sustained gameplay, particularly in MMO environments with large player groups that can cause additional performance pressure.

The 4K resolution should be avoided entirely for gameplay purposes. Even the Low preset at 39 FPS falls below the 60 FPS standard, and the Medium preset's 31 FPS average with 26 FPS minimums would result in a noticeably stuttering experience. The data suggests that 1080p Medium is the highest-quality preset that maintains reliable performance, while 1080p High at 59 FPS is viable for players who prioritize visual fidelity and can accept frame rates hovering near 60 FPS. The Ultra preset, despite offering the maximum visual experience, only achieves 37 FPS at 1080p, which compromises the responsiveness needed for MMO combat.

How This Combo Ranks

This AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + Intel Arc B390 combination ranks 2459th out of 2775 tested configurations for Allods Online, placing it in the 11.4th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking reflects the substantial mismatch between the CPU and GPU: the processor's 75th percentile standing contrasts sharply with the graphics solution's 9th percentile position, creating a system that is fundamentally limited by its integrated graphics. The ranking indicates that the vast majority of tested combinations deliver higher frame rates in this game, with only 316 configurations performing worse.

The ranking's implications are straightforward: this system is positioned at the lower end of the performance spectrum for Allods Online, and the measured frame rates confirm this assessment. The GPU's nearest rivals — the GeForce GT 520MX, GeForce 800M, GeForce GT 625 OEM, and GeForce GT 710 — are all legacy parts from a bygone era, and their performance levels in this game would likely be similar to the Arc B390's. The CPU's nearest rivals, by contrast, are modern processors like the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V and AMD EPYC 9454, which demonstrates the processor's continued competitiveness despite its 2018 release date.

The practical takeaway from the ranking is that this combination is best suited for 1080p gaming with moderate settings, where it can deliver playable frame rates. The 120 FPS result at 1080p Low shows that the hardware can handle undemanding scenarios, while the 12 FPS result at 4K Ultra illustrates the limits of the integrated GPU. For players considering this configuration, the data indicates that managing expectations is essential: this is not a high-performance gaming system, but rather a balanced entry-level setup that can handle older or less demanding titles at lower resolutions. The CPU's strength ensures that upgrading to a more capable discrete GPU in the future would yield significant performance gains, as the processor is clearly not the bottleneck in this pairing.