Intel Core i7-4810MQ

The Intel Core i7-4810MQ is a 2014-era mobile processor built on the Haswell architecture, targeting the high-end laptop segment during its lifecycle. With 4 cores and 8 threads, it operates at a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, placing it within the 47W TDP class. The benchmark data presents a processor that now sits at the 41st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1658. This is a chip that was once a flagship mobile part but has been overtaken by subsequent architecture improvements, yet its performance profile remains coherent and predictable across various workload types.

Benchmark Performance

The Cinebench results reveal a consistent pattern of performance that scales predictably from single-core to multi-core tasks. In Cinebench R15, the i7-4810MQ scores 520 in the multicore test and 73 in the singlecore test. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score jumps to 2167, while the singlecore score reaches 305. In the more demanding Cinebench R23, the multicore figure stands at 5160, with singlecore at 728. This progression shows that the processor’s relative performance improves as the workload becomes more parallel, which is typical for a 4-core, 8-thread design from this era.

The Geekbench results further corroborate this. The multicore score of 3203 versus a singlecore score of 1106 indicates a multi-threading scaling factor of roughly 2.9x. That is a healthy efficiency gain, suggesting that the Hyper-Threading implementation is effective for workloads that can utilize multiple threads. Compared to its average benchmark score of 1658, the individual test scores align closely, with no anomalous outliers that would suggest thermal throttling or driver issues during testing.

The deltaPct values against nearest rivals are remarkably tight. The i7-4810MQ is only 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-4670K. It is 0.3% behind both the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i7-6700TE. These sub-1% differences are statistically negligible, meaning the processor performs within a hair’s breadth of its direct competitors. For practical purposes, the data shows a four-way tie among these parts, with the i7-4810MQ neither leading nor trailing in any meaningful way.

How It Compares

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U: The data shows the i7-4810MQ is 0.1% ahead of this Ryzen mobile part, a margin so small it falls within run-to-run variance. The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U represents a newer architecture, yet the older Haswell design holds its ground in average benchmark scores. This suggests that for mixed workloads, the two processors deliver equivalent throughput, despite the generational gap.

Intel Core i5-4670K: The i7-4810MQ edges out this desktop i5 by 0.2%. The i5-4670K is a quad-core part without Hyper-Threading, so the i7-4810MQ’s 8 threads likely give it an edge in multi-threaded tests. However, the delta is minor, indicating that single-threaded performance and IPC improvements in the newer desktop part nearly offset the thread-count advantage.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U: Here, the i7-4810MQ trails by 0.3%. The Ryzen 7 2700U is a 4-core, 8-thread part with a higher base clock in some configurations, yet the performance difference is negligible. The data implies that for everyday tasks and even moderate content creation, users would not perceive a difference between these two processors.

Intel Core i7-6700TE: The i7-4810MQ is 0.3% behind this embedded Skylake part. The i7-6700TE benefits from a newer architecture with higher IPC, but the i7-4810MQ compensates with a higher boost clock. The net result is a statistical dead heat, making the 4810MQ a competitive option even against processors from a later generation.

Power and Thermals

The 47W TDP classifies the i7-4810MQ as a high-performance mobile processor, one that requires a robust cooling solution. This is not a chip for thin-and-light ultrabooks; it belongs in larger laptops with dedicated thermal chambers, dual heat pipes, and substantial exhaust vents. The 22nm process node and 1,400 million transistor count on a 177 mm² die suggest that heat density is manageable but not trivial. Under sustained multi-core loads, a capable air cooler is mandatory to prevent thermal throttling.

The boost clock of 3.80 GHz is likely sustainable for short bursts, but extended all-core loads may push the processor toward its TDP ceiling. The 47W envelope allows for aggressive power delivery, but the data does not indicate how long the chip can maintain peak boost under sustained stress. For users planning heavy rendering or video encoding, the cooling solution will be the limiting factor, not the CPU’s intrinsic capability. The integrated Intel HD 4600 graphics shares the same thermal budget, though its performance is secondary for most demanding tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-4810MQ compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U?

A: The i7-4810MQ is 0.1% ahead in average benchmark score, a negligible difference indicating virtually identical performance.

Q: What is the processor’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: It sits at the 41st percentile, meaning roughly 59% of all tested CPUs perform better in average benchmark scores.

Q: Does the i7-4810MQ support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory support is not listed for this processor.

Q: What memory bus width does it use?

A: It uses a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, supporting DDR3 memory.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the socket type for this processor?

A: It uses the Intel Socket G3, which is specific to mobile platforms.

Who Should Consider It

For gaming, the i7-4810MQ offers adequate performance for titles that rely on four to eight threads. The singlecore score of 728 in Cinebench R23 is modest by modern standards, but many games still favor single-thread performance, and this chip’s 41st percentile ranking suggests it will handle older titles well. Newer, highly multithreaded games may push it to its limits, but it remains a viable option for a legacy gaming laptop.

For content creation, the multicore score of 5160 in Cinebench R23 indicates that video editing and 3D rendering workloads will complete, albeit slower than contemporary parts. The near-tie with the Ryzen 7 2700U underscores that this is not a productivity slouch, but users should expect longer render times compared to modern 8-core or 12-core processors. The 8 threads provide a tangible benefit over 4-core parts without Hyper-Threading.

For office and productivity tasks, the i7-4810MQ is more than sufficient. Spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing will not stress the processor, and its 2.80 GHz base clock ensures responsive interaction. The data shows it matches the i5-4670K, a desktop part, so it handles typical business workloads with ease. It is a poor fit for users who need maximum battery life, given its 47W TDP, but for plugged-in productivity, it performs admirably.

Platform and Compatibility

The i7-4810MQ uses the Intel Socket G3, a platform that is now end-of-life. This means upgrade paths are limited to other Socket G3 parts, which are themselves aging. The processor supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. This is a bottleneck compared to newer DDR4 or DDR5 platforms, but it is sufficient for the processor’s performance class.

PCIe support is Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This allows for a discrete graphics card or a couple of NVMe SSDs, though the lane count is fixed. The integrated Intel HD 4600 graphics is available for basic display output, but it is not suitable for gaming. The platform’s age means that modern features like PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5, and faster memory standards, are unavailable. For someone building a new system, this is a dead end; for someone with a compatible laptop, it is a functional, if dated, platform.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The split between single-thread and multi-thread scores reveals a processor that scales well when all cores are engaged. In Cinebench R23, the ratio of multicore to singlecore is roughly 7.1x, which is excellent for a 4-core, 8-thread part. This indicates that the Hyper-Threading implementation is efficient and that the chip does not suffer from significant contention when threads compete for resources.

However, the single-thread performance is the weak point. A Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 728 places it well below modern processors, which often exceed 1500 in the same test. This means that lightly threaded applications, such as legacy games, spreadsheet recalculation, or web browsing, will feel slower than on a contemporary chip. The 3.80 GHz boost clock is high, but the Haswell architecture’s lower IPC compared to Skylake or Zen cannot compensate.

For real workloads, this split implies that mixed usage — where some tasks are single-threaded and others are multi-threaded — will show inconsistent responsiveness. A video export will run reasonably well, but navigating a complex web page may feel sluggish. The data suggests that the i7-4810MQ is best suited for sustained, parallel workloads rather than bursty, latency-sensitive tasks. Its 41st percentile ranking reflects this dichotomy: strong multi-core for its era, but dated single-core capability.