Intel Core i5-4670R

The Intel Core i5-4670R is a 4-core, 4-thread desktop processor from the Haswell generation, built on Intel's 22 nm process. With an average benchmark score of 1286, it sits at the 36th percentile of all CPUs, placing it squarely in the mid-range of the performance distribution. The data shows a processor that is competitive with a narrow cluster of rivals, though its age is reflected in its absolute scores.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-4670R’s average benchmark score of 1286 places it in a very tight competitive band. Its nearest rival, the AMD Opteron 6272, scores 1288, making the i5-4670R just 0.1% slower. This effectively means the two are performance equals in aggregate, despite the Opteron being a server-class part with a different architecture. The data also shows the i5-4670R holds a slim 0.4% lead over the Intel Xeon D-1527 (score 1281) and a 0.5% lead over both the Intel Core i3-10110U and Intel Core i7-3610QE (each scoring 1279). These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, indicating that the i5-4670R trades blows with a wide range of processors from different eras and market segments.

Looking at the specific Cinebench scores provides a clearer picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 448, while the single-core score is 63. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score jumps to 1868 and single-core to 263. In the more demanding Cinebench R23, the processor achieves 4448 points in multicore and 627 in single-core. These numbers illustrate a processor that scales predictably with workload intensity. The R23 multicore score of 4448 is roughly 2.4 times the R15 multicore score, which is expected given the increased rendering demands of the newer benchmark. The single-core scores show a similar trend, with R23’s 627 being about 10 times the R15’s 63, reflecting the benchmark’s heavier per-thread requirements.

The deltaPct values against the nearest rivals are all under 1%, which is statistically insignificant. This suggests that the i5-4670R’s performance is not defined by a clear advantage or disadvantage, but rather by its position at the center of a cluster of similarly-performing CPUs. For users comparing these parts, the choice would come down to platform features rather than raw compute speed. The 36th percentile ranking reinforces this view; the processor is not a top-tier performer, but it is far from the bottom, offering a baseline level of compute that is sufficient for everyday tasks and light productivity.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The split between single-thread and multi-thread performance is instructive for understanding real workload behavior. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score of 627 is about 14% of the multicore score of 4448. This ratio is typical for a 4-core, 4-thread processor, as the multicore test scales across all available threads. However, the absolute single-core score of 627 is modest by modern standards, indicating that lightly-threaded applications will not see exceptional responsiveness. In contrast, the multicore score of 4448 shows that the processor can handle fully-parallel workloads reasonably well for its class, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, where all four cores are engaged.

The gap between single-core and multi-core scores also highlights the impact of the 3.70 GHz boost clock. The base clock is 3.00 GHz, and the boost clock provides a 23% frequency increase for single-threaded tasks. This boost is why the single-core scores, while not high in absolute terms, are still respectable relative to the multicore scores. For workloads that rely on one or two threads, such as older games or spreadsheet calculations, the boost clock helps mitigate the age of the Haswell architecture. Conversely, for heavy multi-threaded workloads, the processor relies on all four cores running at sustained boost frequencies, and the 65W TDP suggests it can maintain these clocks without excessive thermal throttling.

The data indicates that the i5-4670R is a balanced performer, but not a specialist. It will not excel in heavily-threaded content creation tasks like 4K video rendering, where newer 8-core or 16-core processors dominate. However, for light photo editing, office productivity, and web browsing, the single-thread performance is adequate, and the multi-thread scores are sufficient for occasional batch processing. The key takeaway is that the processor's behavior is consistent with its 4-core design, offering predictable scaling across both single and multi-threaded benchmarks.

Power and Thermals

The Core i5-4670R has a TDP of 65W, which classifies it as a mainstream power envelope. This is a relatively modest thermal requirement, meaning that a capable air cooler is sufficient for maintaining optimal performance. The 22 nm process node and 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die contribute to this efficiency. The data does not provide specific thermal measurements, but the 65W TDP implies that the processor will not generate excessive heat, making it suitable for compact desktop builds or systems with limited cooling headroom.

The integrated graphics, Intel Iris? Pro 5200, is also a factor in power consumption. This is a higher-tier integrated graphics solution, and its inclusion in the TDP budget means that the CPU cores may have slightly less thermal headroom under combined CPU and GPU load. However, for typical usage, the 65W TDP is manageable. The processor is not a high-performance part that requires exotic cooling; a standard tower cooler or a low-profile cooler in a small form factor case should suffice. The data shows a processor that is thermally well-behaved for its era, with the 22 nm process providing a good balance between performance and power draw.

The 65W TDP also has implications for sustained performance. In a system with adequate airflow, the processor should be able to maintain its boost clock of 3.70 GHz across all four cores under full load. Without a specific power draw measurement, the TDP is the best indicator of the cooling tier required. This places the i5-4670R in the same class as many other mainstream desktop processors, meaning that users can expect quiet and cool operation with standard cooling solutions.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-4670R compare to the AMD Opteron 6272?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the Opteron 6272 scoring 1288 and the i5-4670R scoring 1286. This makes the i5-4670R 0.1% slower than the Opteron, indicating they are performance equivalents.

Q: What is the processor's ranking among all CPUs?

A: The i5-4670R is at the 36th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly a third of the processors in the benchmark database.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores?

A: In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves a multicore score of 4448 and a single-core score of 627.

Q: Does the processor support ECC memory?

A: No, the data indicates that ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the TDP and what cooling does it require?

A: The TDP is 65W, which implies a capable air cooler is sufficient for thermal management.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking within the thermal limits of the 65W TDP.

Who Should Consider It

The benchmark data suggests the i5-4670R is best suited for users with modest compute needs. For gaming, the single-core score of 627 in Cinebench R23 indicates that it can handle older or less demanding titles, but it may struggle with the latest AAA games that require high single-thread performance. The integrated Iris? Pro 5200 graphics provide a baseline for gaming without a discrete GPU, but for modern gaming, a dedicated graphics card is necessary. The processor's 36th percentile ranking reinforces that it is not a high-end gaming CPU.

For content creation, the multicore score of 4448 in Cinebench R23 shows that it can handle light video editing and photo rendering, but it will be slow for professional-grade workloads. Users who occasionally render short clips or batch-process images will find it adequate, but those who do this daily should look elsewhere. Office productivity is where the i5-4670R shines; the single-core and multicore scores are more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, email, and web browsing. The 4 cores and 4 threads handle multitasking well, and the 65W TDP keeps power consumption low.

The data shows a processor that is a good fit for a secondary or budget-oriented desktop build. It is not a specialist tool, but a general-purpose workhorse. Users with older software that is not heavily threaded will see acceptable performance, and the unlocked multiplier offers some headroom for enthusiasts who want to squeeze out extra performance. However, for those with demanding workloads, the 36th percentile ranking is a clear warning that this processor is not a top performer.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Core i5-4670R uses the Intel BGA 1364 socket, which means it is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. This is a significant compatibility consideration, as it limits the user to the motherboard it comes with. The processor supports DDR3 memory, which is an older standard compared to DDR4 or DDR5. This limits memory bandwidth and capacity compared to modern platforms, but for the processor's performance class, DDR3 is adequate.

The architecture is Haswell, which is a 2013-era design. The processor has 4 MB of shared L3 cache, with 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core. This cache configuration is typical for the time. The PCIe support is not specified in the data, but as a Haswell part, it would support PCIe 3.0, which is standard for that generation. The integrated graphics, Intel Iris? Pro 5200, is a notable feature, offering better than average integrated graphics performance for its era.

The upgrade path is essentially non-existent due to the BGA 1364 socket. Users are locked into the processor and motherboard combination. This means that the i5-4670R is best considered as a complete platform solution rather than a component for an upgrade path. The memory support for DDR3 further limits future compatibility, as newer systems use DDR4 or DDR5. The data indicates that this is a processor for a specific, fixed system, not a flexible building block. For those looking to build a new system with modern features, this processor is not the right choice, but for a pre-built or embedded solution, it offers a complete package with acceptable performance.