AMD

AMD Opteron 6328

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

8
Cores
8
Threads
3.8
GHz Boost
115W
TDP
ECC Memory

At a Glance

AMD
Cores / Threads 8C / 8T
Boost Clock 3.8 GHz
Base Clock 3.2 GHz
L3 Cache 8 MB (per die)
TDP 115W
Architecture Piledriver
Socket AMD Socket G34
nm
Process 32 nm
Released Nov 2012

AMD Opteron 6328 Specifications

Opteron 6328 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD Opteron 6328 features 8 physical cores and 8 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
8
Threads
8
SMP CPUs
4

Opteron 6328 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Opteron 6328 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Opteron 6328 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
3.2 GHz
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
All-Core Turbo
3.5 GHz
Multiplier
16x

AMD's Opteron 6328 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Opteron 6328 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Opteron 6328's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
384 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
8 MB (per die)

Piledriver Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD Opteron 6328 is built on AMD's 32 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Opteron 6328 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Piledriver
Codename
Abu Dhabi
Process Node
32 nm
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
Transistors
2,400 million
Die Size
2x 315 mm²
Generation
Opteron (Abu Dhabi)

Piledriver Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Opteron 6328 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
FMA3
BMI1
AMD64
AMD-V

Opteron 6328 Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD Opteron 6328 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 115W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
115W

AMD Socket G34 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Opteron 6328 uses the AMD Socket G34 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket G34
Chipsets
AMD SR5650, SR5670, SR5690
PCIe
Gen 2
Package
FCLGA-1944
DDR5

AMD Socket G34 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Opteron 6328 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Opteron 6328 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR3
Memory Bus
Quad-channel
Memory Bandwidth
59.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

Opteron 6328 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Opteron 6328 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Nov 2012
Launch Price
$575
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
End-of-life
Part Number
OS6328WKT8GHK

Opteron 6328 Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD Opteron 6328 performs in parallel rendering workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #1273 of 1967
454
3%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD Opteron 6328 handles tasks that can't be parallelized.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #1304 of 1400
64
3%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD Opteron 6328. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #1108 of 1786
1,894
3%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD Opteron 6328. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #1103 of 1776
267
3%
Max: 8,811

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD Opteron 6328 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #1240 of 1938
4,510
3%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD Opteron 6328 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #1243 of 1923
636
3%
Max: 20,979

About AMD Opteron 6328

The AMD Opteron 6328 is an 8-core, 8-thread server processor built on the Piledriver architecture (codename Abu Dhabi) for the AMD Socket G34 platform. Launched on 2012-11-04 with a launch MSRP of $575, this 32nm part features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. It is now end-of-life, but its benchmark profile places it in the 36th percentile of all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1304. The part number is OS6328WKT8GHK, targeting the Server/Workstation market segment with support for DDR3 memory, ECC, and quad-channel bandwidth.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The split between single-thread and multi-thread performance is stark. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 4510 contrasts sharply with the single-core score of 636. This pattern repeats across R15 (454 multi vs 64 single) and R20 (1894 multi vs 267 single). The data indicates a processor that scales exceptionally well with core count, but struggles with lightly-threaded workloads. The 8 physical cores, without simultaneous multithreading (8 threads total), rely entirely on core count for throughput. The base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost clock of 3.80 GHz are moderate, but the Piledriver architecture's IPC is the limiting factor.

For real-world applications, this means heavily parallel tasks like video rendering or batch data processing will utilize the silicon effectively, whereas legacy single-threaded office applications or older games will see performance bottlenecked by the Piledriver core's modest IPC. The consistent scaling across Cinebench generations suggests that the architecture's multi-threaded efficiency is a defining characteristic, yet the absolute single-core scores remain low enough to limit everyday responsiveness. The cache hierarchy, consisting of 384 KB of L1, 2 MB per module of L2, and 8 MB per die of L3, is designed to feed the 8 cores, but the latency characteristics of the 32nm process and Piledriver design hinder single-thread performance.

Power and Thermals

The Opteron 6328 carries a TDP of 115 W, which is modest for a dual-die server part. The 32 nm process from GlobalFoundries packs 2,400 million transistors across a combined die size of 2x 315 mm². This thermal envelope implies a need for a standard server-grade air cooler capable of dissipating 115 W, but it does not demand exotic liquid cooling. The platform supports DDR3 memory via a quad-channel interface, providing a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. ECC memory support is a critical feature for server stability. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The PCIe Gen 2 interface is a limiting factor for modern high-bandwidth accelerators.

The large die area and 115 W TDP mean that heat dissipation is manageable with a capable air cooler, but the 32nm process node is inefficient by modern standards, generating more heat per transistor than newer processes. For a server platform, the 115 W TDP is well within the envelope of standard 1U and 2U heatsinks, making cooling a straightforward affair. The quad-channel DDR3 memory controller, with its 59.7 GB/s bandwidth, is a significant advantage over consumer desktop platforms of the same era, which typically used dual-channel memory.

Who Should Consider It

This CPU is a niche product today. Given its 36th percentile ranking and its multi-core scaling, it is best suited for throughput-oriented server tasks. The 8 cores and 8 threads, combined with 59.7 GB/s of quad-channel DDR3 bandwidth, make it a viable candidate for a homelab server running virtualized workloads, container hosts, or network-attached storage with heavy parity calculations. It is not recommended for gaming or general desktop use, as the single-core score of 636 in Cinebench R23 will bottleneck most modern game engines. For office productivity, the low single-thread performance means spreadsheet and document rendering will feel sluggish compared to modern low-end chips.

Its primary value lies in multi-threaded server applications where ECC memory and core count outweigh single-thread speed. The end-of-life status means it appeals to enthusiasts building legacy systems or those needing a cheap ECC-capable platform. The 36th percentile ranking places it below the majority of CPUs, but within the context of legacy server hardware, it offers a specific set of trade-offs. For database hosting or web servers that utilize multiple threads, the 8 cores provide adequate throughput. For single-threaded scripting or application servers, the performance will be disappointing.

How It Compares

Intel Pentium Silver N6005: The Opteron 6328 and the Pentium Silver N6005 both achieve an average score of 1304, resulting in a deltaPct of 0%. This parity is striking given the different market positions. The Opteron's higher core count is entirely offset by the N6005's architectural efficiency in synthetic benchmarks.

AMD Athlon Gold 7220U: The Opteron trails the Athlon Gold 7220U by 0.6%, with the Athlon scoring 1311 against the Opteron's 1304. The Athlon Gold edges out the Opteron in average benchmark scores, demonstrating that newer architectures can close the core count gap.

Intel Core i7-2600: The Opteron falls 0.8% behind the Intel Core i7-2600, which scores 1314. The Opteron's weaker single-thread performance (R23 single 636) drags its average down to nearly match the i7.

Intel Core i7-3770T: The gap widens slightly to 1.1% against the Core i7-3770T, which scores 1319. The Opteron's 8 cores cannot compensate for the architectural IPC deficit, resulting in a lower average score.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a processor that was designed for a specific era. The Opteron 6328's average benchmark score of 1304 places it in the 36th percentile of all tested CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 4510 is significantly higher than the single-core score of 636, but this strong scaling is from a very low single-thread baseline. The R20 results (1894 multi, 267 single) and R15 results (454 multi, 64 single) follow the exact same proportional pattern.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the Opteron is statistically tied with the Pentium Silver N6005 (0% delta), while lagging the Athlon Gold 7220U (-0.6%), the Core i7-2600 (-0.8%), and the Core i7-3770T (-1.1%). The tight clustering of these rivals, all within a 1.1% band, shows that the Opteron 6328 sits at a performance equilibrium with several very different processor designs. Its 8 cores and 3.80 GHz boost clock are insufficient to overcome the architectural advancements of its rivals. The 2,400 million transistors on a 32 nm process are utilized inefficiently for single-thread tasks. For multi-threaded workloads, the 4510 R23 score is respectable, but the platform's PCIe Gen 2 and DDR3 memory support limit its modern applicability. The data confirms that this end-of-life server chip is best left to legacy systems or highly specific multi-threaded homelab scenarios where ECC memory is a hard requirement. The consistent scaling across all three Cinebench versions highlights a balanced multi-threaded design, yet the absolute scores remain low in the overall distribution.

The Intel Equivalent of Opteron 6328

Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-3335S offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.

Intel Core i5-3335S

Intel • 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD Opteron 6328 Comparisons

See how the Opteron 6328 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Opteron 6328 with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs