Intel Core i5-1350P

Intel Core i5-1350P is a Raptor Lake mobile processor with 12 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 1900.00 MHz, and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The data lists a 28 W TDP and an average benchmark score of 4667, which places it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. It sits in a tight cluster with four Intel rivals, all of which have average scores between 4672 and 4694.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data consists entirely of Cinebench scores. In Cinebench R23, the multicore result is 16137 and the single-core result is 2278. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 6777 and the single-core score is 956. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1626 and the single-core score is 229. These individual results feed into an average benchmark score of 4667.

That 4667 average means the i5-1350P is placed at the 62nd percentile globally. The nearestRivals table in the data shows how close the aggregate numbers are. The Intel Core i9-10900F has an average score of 4672, with a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i9-9900KS has an average score of 4674, also with a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Xeon W-1290E scores 4686, with a delta of -0.4%. The Intel Core i7-12700TE scores 4694, with a delta of -0.6%. All four deltas are negative in the data, meaning the i5-1350P sits slightly below each listed rival. The largest gap is only 0.6%, so at the aggregate level these five processors are effectively in the same performance band.

The Cinebench R23 multicore result of 16137 is the strongest single number in the pack. For a mobile part in the 28 W TDP class, a multicore score at that level shows substantial parallel throughput. The R20 multicore number of 6777 reinforces the same conclusion. The R15 multicore score of 1626 is in line with that pattern, though it is an older test and should be read alongside the R20 and R23 results rather than in isolation.

Power and Thermals

The power and thermal story is dominated by the TDP field: 28 W. That is the only thermal-relevant data point in the pack, but it is enough to establish the TDP class. A 28 W mobile processor is in a low-power envelope, not a desktop-class one. It implies a modest cooling solution, sized for a portable chassis rather than a high-airflow tower.

The processor is built on Intel's 10 nm process, according to the process node field. It also uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, and the market segment is explicitly listed as Mobile. Together, the 28 W TDP and mobile packaging point toward thin, power-conscious systems. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, which means the CPU package includes a GPU that can handle display output and lighter graphics work, though the data does not quantify its performance separately.

The absence of transistor count and die size data limits deeper thermal analysis. What the data does show is a mobile processor with a tight power budget, a 10 nm build, and a low-power thermal class. The 4.70 GHz boost clock suggests that peak frequency is available in short bursts, while the 1900.00 MHz base clock indicates a conservative sustained operating point.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

Across all three Cinebench versions, the multicore score is substantially higher than the single-core score. In R23, the single-core result is 2278 and the multicore result is 16137. In R20, the single result is 956 and the multicore result is 6777. In R15, the single result is 229 and the multicore result is 1626. That pattern is expected from a 12-core, 16-thread processor. The CPU has many parallel resources, and the Cinebench multicore tests are designed to use them.

The single-core scores are not weak in absolute terms. The R23 single-core score of 2278 and the R20 single-core score of 956 suggest a responsive lightly threaded execution path. The 4.70 GHz boost clock is likely part of the reason for that single-core strength. The base clock of 1900.00 MHz is much lower, which implies frequency scaling is a central part of how this processor balances performance and the 28 W power budget.

For real workloads, this split means the i5-1350P should handle two different types of tasks well. Workloads that use one or two threads will depend on the single-core Cinebench performance, and those numbers are competitive enough to place the processor at the 62nd percentile overall. Workloads such as rendering, encoding, or compilation that scale across cores will see the multicore advantage, and those workloads have a lot of cores to use.

How It Compares

Intel Core i9-10900F: The i5-1350P averages 4667, while the i9-10900F averages 4672. The delta is -0.1%. In this data, the mobile i5 effectively matches the desktop i9 in aggregate score.

Intel Core i9-9900KS: The i9-9900KS has an average score of 4674, just two points higher than the i9-10900F and seven points higher than the i5-1350P. The delta remains -0.1%. This is another near-tie, despite the i5-1350P being a mobile processor.

Intel Xeon W-1290E: The Xeon W-1290E averages 4686, with a delta of -0.4%. The i5-1350P is slightly behind, but the gap is still small in aggregate terms. The Xeon's score is 19 points higher than the i5's 4667 in the data.

Intel Core i7-12700TE: The i7-12700TE is the highest-scoring nearest rival at 4694. Its delta is -0.6%, which is the largest gap in the nearestRivals list. Even so, the difference is under a full percent, meaning the i5-1350P is in the same performance neighborhood as all four rivals.

Platform and Compatibility

The Intel Core i5-1350P uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, a mobile package in this data. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, and the memory bus is dual-channel. ECC memory is not supported. For expansion, the PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 Lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

The cache layout is listed as L1 80 KB per core, L2 2 MB per core, and L3 12 MB shared. The architecture is Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-P. The process node is 10 nm, and the production status is Active. The release date is 2023-01-03. The launch MSRP is $320.

Because BGA 1744 is a board-mounted mobile package, the upgrade path is tied to the platform. The data does not list a separate desktop socket or any cross-socket compatibility. Users should expect this processor to be integrated into a laptop or mobile board design, meaning CPU upgrades would depend on the larger platform rather than a simple socket swap.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i5-1350P?

A: The average benchmark score is 4667, and the percentile versus all CPUs is 62.

Q: Which nearest rivals are within 0.1% of its average score?

A: The Intel Core i9-10900F averages 4672 with a -0.1% delta, and the Intel Core i9-9900KS averages 4674 with a -0.1% delta.

Q: What memory types does the processor support?

A: It supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What socket does it use?

A: Intel BGA 1744.

Q: Does the processor have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No, the multiplier unlocked field is false.

Q: What integrated graphics does it include?

A: Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

Who Should Consider It

Creation-oriented mobile users are the clearest match for this processor. The 12 cores and 16 threads give parallel workloads substantial resources, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16137 places the chip close to the listed Intel i9 and Xeon rivals. The largest gap to any nearest rival is only 0.6%, so for multithreaded rendering or encoding work this mobile chip should be able to hold its own in its thermal class.

Office and general productivity users could also benefit. The single-core Cinebench scores, particularly the R23 result of 2278, indicate solid lightly threaded performance. The 28 W TDP and integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU mean a system built around this processor could handle everyday tasks without needing a discrete GPU. The low power figure also suggests it belongs in portable designs where battery life and heat are priorities.

For gaming, the data is more limited. There are no game benchmarks in the pack, so conclusions must be drawn from CPU-side numbers alone. The 4.70 GHz boost clock is a favorable sign for CPU-bound gaming tasks that rely on high single-thread frequency. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, however, is an integrated solution, and the data does not include any graphics performance scores. Gamers who expect discrete-class graphics performance would need to look at the rest of the platform for a separate GPU. The benchmark data alone only supports conclusions about the Cinebench workloads it records.