Intel Celeron J4105

The Intel Celeron J4105 is a 4-core, 4-thread mobile processor built on the Goldmont Plus architecture (Gemini Lake) at 14 nm. It runs at a 1.50 GHz base clock with a 2.50 GHz boost, fits the Intel BGA 1090 socket, and carries a 10 W TDP. It supports dual-channel DDR4 with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, includes UHD Graphics 600, and was released in December 2017 with a launch MSRP of $107. The part is now end-of-life.

Who Should Consider It

The J4105 is a low-power, entry-level chip aimed at basic computing. Its benchmark scores place it in the 21st percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 827. That figure puts it firmly in the “light duty” tier. For office work, word processing, spreadsheets, email, and web browsing, the processor is adequate. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 339 is modest, but it can handle everyday responsiveness without major delays. Multi-core performance, at 2404 in Cinebench R23, is enough for a few browser tabs and a background application, though heavy multitasking will strain it.

For content creation, the J4105 is not a serious option. The multi-core scores are far below what modern rendering or video encoding demands. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result of 1009 and R15 multi-core of 242 indicate that any sustained CPU-bound workload, like compiling code, batch photo editing, or 3D rendering, will be slow. It might handle light photo editing or casual audio work, but anything more intensive will test patience. The integrated UHD Graphics 600 is not designed for gaming; combined with the low CPU scores, the data suggests this is not a platform for modern 3D games. The 21st percentile ranking reinforces that the J4105 is best suited for basic tasks, not performance-hungry applications.

How It Compares

The J4105 sits in a tight cluster of older processors. Its average benchmark score of 827 is within 1% of four rivals. Against the AMD A10 PRO-7850B (average score 828), the J4105 is 0.1% slower, effectively a tie. The AMD PRO A10-8750B (821) is beaten by 0.8%, and the Intel Xeon E5540 (820) is also 0.8% behind. The only rival that edges ahead is the Intel Core i5-3360M (835), which is 0.9% faster. These deltas are tiny, so the J4105 is performance-equivalent to all four parts in the database’s aggregate scoring. The practical takeaway: if you are upgrading from any of these older CPUs, you will not notice a difference in raw throughput. The J4105 is not a step forward; it is a lateral move in a low-power envelope.

Power and Thermals

The J4105 is rated at a 10 W TDP. That is extremely low for a quad-core processor, which means it generates very little heat. In a compact or fanless system, a basic passive cooler or a small low-profile fan is sufficient to keep it within operating limits. The 14 nm process and Goldmont Plus architecture contribute to this efficiency. Because the chip is soldered to the Intel BGA 1090 socket, there is no upgrade path; the cooling solution is fixed by the system designer. The low TDP also enables silent operation in thin-and-light notebooks or mini PCs. The data shows that power consumption is a non-issue; the primary constraint is performance, not thermals.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Celeron J4105?

A: The TDP is 10 W.

Q: Does the J4105 support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth?

A: The J4105 has dual-channel DDR4 support with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Q: What integrated graphics does it include?

A: It includes Intel UHD Graphics 600.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked.

Q: What is the process node?

A: The process node is 14 nm.

Benchmark Performance

The J4105’s average benchmark score is 827, placing it in the 21st percentile of all CPUs. This means it outperforms only about a fifth of the processors in the database. Its nearest rivals are all within a single percentage point. Against the AMD A10 PRO-7850B, the delta is -0.1%, meaning the J4105 is essentially tied. The AMD PRO A10-8750B and Intel Xeon E5540 are both 0.8% slower than the J4105, while the Intel Core i5-3360M is 0.9% faster. These differences are within run-to-run noise and do not represent a meaningful performance gap. In practical terms, the J4105 is interchangeable with these older parts.

Looking at specific Cinebench runs, the J4105 scores 242 in R15 multi-core, 1009 in R20 multi-core, and 2404 in R23 multi-core. Single-core scores are 142 in R20 and 339 in R23. These numbers are consistent with a low-end quad-core from the late 2010s. The multi-core results are roughly 7 times the single-core results, which reflects the scaling across the four physical cores. However, the absolute values are low enough that any modern mid-range desktop CPU will outperform it by a wide margin. The benchmark data confirms that the J4105 is not a performance part; it is a power-efficient one.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The J4105 has four cores and four threads, with no hyper-threading. This means each core handles one thread. The single-thread scores, 142 in Cinebench R20 and 339 in R23, are modest. They reflect the relatively low base clock of 1.50 GHz and the Goldmont Plus architecture, which prioritizes efficiency over raw speed. For tasks that rely on a single core, like launching applications or handling one heavy browser tab, the J4105 will feel sluggish compared to modern parts.

Multi-thread performance is better, as expected. The R23 multi-core score of 2404 is more than 7 times the single-core score, showing that the four cores can work together effectively when a workload is parallelized. This makes the J4105 reasonably competent for multi-threaded office workloads, such as compressing files or running a few virtual machines (if memory allows). However, the absolute multi-core score is still low; it is not a chip for video rendering or heavy scientific computing. The gap between single- and multi-thread scores is typical for a quad-core without SMT, but the low overall performance means users should keep expectations in check. For basic productivity, the J4105 is fine; for anything demanding, it will be a bottleneck.