AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 2 architecture, specifically the Renoir generation, and fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. It carries a 10 W TDP, positioning it as a low-power part with a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.15 GHz. Its benchmark data places it at the 59th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 3875, placing it in a tightly contested performance tier.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for the Ryzen Embedded V2718 show a processor that is consistently competitive with its nearest rivals across multi-threaded workloads, while its single-thread performance tells a more nuanced story. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 13396 in multi-core and 1891 in single-core. These results, when compared to the average scores of its nearest rivals, show a processor that is essentially performance-neutral in aggregate, but with distinct workload-specific characteristics.

The average benchmark score of 3875 places the V2718 within a narrow band of competitors. It sits virtually tied with the Intel Xeon E-2278GE, which averages 3876, a delta of 0%. This suggests that for a broad mix of tasks, the two processors are interchangeable in terms of raw output. The AMD Ryzen 7 1800X is just behind at 3858, a 0.4% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 trails slightly more at 3849, a 0.7% delta. These are remarkably small margins, indicating that the V2718 is not a performance outlier but rather a solid mid-pack contender.

However, the single-core scores reveal a different picture. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1891, while respectable, is not the standout feature of this chip. The multi-core score of 13396 is a stronger showing, and the ratio between the two suggests a processor that scales well with additional threads. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5626, and the single-core score is 794. The R15 results follow the same pattern, with 1350 multi-core and 190 single-core. The data indicates that the V2718's strength lies in its ability to handle parallel workloads, likely due to its 8 cores and 16 threads, rather than in peak single-thread responsiveness.

The deltaPct values against the rivals are all within a range of -0.8% to 0.7%. This is a remarkably tight cluster, meaning that in aggregate performance, the choice between these CPUs comes down to factors other than raw speed, such as platform features or power envelope. The V2718's 10 W TDP is a significant differentiator, as its rivals, while similar in performance, do not match this power efficiency. The benchmark data shows a processor that delivers competitive multi-threaded performance at a fraction of the power draw, which is a key consideration for embedded and compact system designs.

How It Compares

Intel Xeon E-2278GE: The benchmark data shows the V2718 and the Xeon E-2278GE are effectively tied, with the Intel part holding a 0% delta and an average score of 3876. This means that for general-purpose computing, neither processor has a decisive edge in throughput. The V2718's advantage comes from its 10 W TDP and integrated Radeon Graphics, whereas the Xeon is a more traditional server-oriented part. The data suggests that in a pure compute comparison, users should expect near-identical performance.

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X: The V2718 is 0.4% ahead of the Ryzen 7 1800X, which averages 3858. This is a negligible margin, effectively making them peers in multi-core performance. The 1800X is an older, higher-TDP desktop part, so the V2718 achieving parity while operating at a much lower power draw is notable. The single-core results, however, might favor the newer Zen 2 architecture of the V2718, though the aggregate score shows they are close.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700: The Ryzen 7 2700 averages 3849, placing it 0.7% behind the V2718. This is again a marginal difference. The 2700 is a 65 W desktop processor, so the V2718's ability to match its performance at a 10 W TDP is a highlight of the data. For users upgrading from a 2700-class system, the V2718 offers similar compute capabilities with significantly reduced power requirements and a more integrated platform.

AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE: The V2718 is 0.8% behind the Ryzen 5 4600GE, which averages 3906. This is the only rival where the V2718 trails, but the deficit is small. The 4600GE is a 6-core, 12-thread processor, so the V2718's additional two cores and four threads do not translate into a win in the aggregate score. This suggests that the 4600GE's higher clock speeds or architectural efficiencies offset the V2718's core count advantage in the benchmark suite.

Platform and Compatibility

The Ryzen Embedded V2718 uses the AMD Socket FP6, which is a BGA (ball grid array) package, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard rather than being a drop-in upgrade. It is based on the Zen 2 (Renoir) architecture and is part of the Ryzen Embedded generation. The processor supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for embedded and server applications where data integrity is paramount.

For expansion, the V2718 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. This is a modest number of lanes, suitable for a few NVMe drives or a single discrete GPU, but it is not designed for heavily populated expansion slots. The integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics with 448 shader processors, which provides basic display output capabilities without the need for a separate graphics card. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not supported. The production status is active, and the release date is November 9, 2020.

The upgrade path is limited by the FP6 socket. Since the processor is soldered, users cannot swap it for a different model. The platform is designed for embedded systems where longevity and stability are more important than upgradability. The combination of ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 3 lanes, and integrated graphics makes it a self-contained solution for compact industrial PCs, network appliances, or thin clients. The 7 nm process and 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die indicate a modern, efficient design.

FAQ

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen Embedded V2718?

A: The TDP is 10 W, which is exceptionally low for an 8-core, 16-thread processor.

Q: Does the Ryzen Embedded V2718 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, it supports ECC memory, making it suitable for reliability-focused embedded workloads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of this processor?

A: The boost clock is 4.15 GHz, while the base clock is 1.70 GHz.

Q: How many PCIe lanes are available from the CPU?

A: The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the socket type for the Ryzen Embedded V2718?

A: It uses the AMD Socket FP6, which is a soldered BGA package.

Q: When was this processor released?

A: The release date is November 9, 2020.

Who Should Consider It

The benchmark data suggests that the Ryzen Embedded V2718 is well-suited for workloads that benefit from multi-threaded performance at a minimal power cost. The multi-core score of 13396 in Cinebench R23 is strong for a 10 W part, placing it in the same performance class as desktop processors with much higher power envelopes, such as the Ryzen 7 1800X and Ryzen 7 2700, which are only 0.4% and 0.7% behind, respectively. This makes it an excellent candidate for passive-cooled systems, fanless industrial PCs, or any application where heat dissipation and energy consumption are primary constraints.

For content creation tasks that are multi-threaded, such as video encoding or 3D rendering in Cinebench-like workloads, the V2718 will provide competitive throughput. The single-core score of 1891 in Cinebench R23 is lower than what high-end desktop parts achieve, but it is sufficient for most productivity applications. Office workloads, web browsing, and document processing are not thread-limited, so the V2718 will handle these tasks without issue, though it will not excel in heavily single-threaded applications like some desktop chips. The integrated Radeon Graphics 448SP means that basic display and video playback are covered, but gaming on this processor would rely on the iGPU's modest capabilities.

The primary audience for this processor is system integrators building compact, energy-efficient devices that require reliable, always-on operation. The 10 W TDP allows for small heatsinks and fanless designs, while the 8 cores and 16 threads ensure that background tasks, virtualization, or containerized workloads run smoothly. The ECC memory support adds a layer of data protection that is often required in networking, storage, or financial applications. Users who prioritize raw single-thread performance or who plan to upgrade their CPU in the future should look elsewhere, as the FP6 socket is not upgradeable.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The benchmark results show a clear split between single-thread and multi-thread performance for the Ryzen Embedded V2718. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13396 is approximately 7.1 times the single-core score of 1891, which is a strong scaling ratio for an 8-core processor. This indicates that the processor can effectively utilize all of its cores and threads, with minimal contention or thermal throttling, even at its low 10 W TDP. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with a multi-core score of 5626 and a single-core score of 794, yielding a ratio of about 7.1.

This behavior means that the V2718 is best deployed in scenarios where parallelism is the norm. Compiling code, batch image processing, or running multiple virtual machines will see near-linear benefits from the core count. The single-core performance, while not exceptional, is adequate for everyday tasks. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 190 is modest, suggesting that highly latency-sensitive applications, such as certain gaming engines or real-time audio processing, may not perform as well as on a processor with higher per-core clocks.

The aggregate benchmark score of 3875, which places it at the 59th percentile, reflects a balanced profile that is skewed toward multi-threading. In contrast, a processor with a higher single-core score but fewer cores might achieve a similar aggregate score but behave very differently in real workloads. The V2718's multi-thread strength is its defining characteristic, making it a suitable choice for always-on server-like tasks in an embedded form factor. The data does not suggest that this is a processor for overclocking or for achieving maximum frame rates; instead, it is a workhorse for sustained, parallel throughput with exceptional power efficiency.