AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B is a desktop-segment processor with 4 cores and 8 threads, running at a base clock of 3.35 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. Built on the Zen architecture for AMD Socket FP5, it uses GlobalFoundries' 14 nm process and integrates a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics unit. Its average benchmark score is 2012, which places it at the 47th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Benchmark Performance

Across the Cinebench suite, the V1807B records a multicore score of 701 in Cinebench R15, 2921 in Cinebench R20, and 6957 in Cinebench R23. The corresponding single-core scores are 98, 412, and 982. These numbers show a consistent scaling pattern: the multi-core results are much larger than the single-core results in every generation, reflecting the 4-core/8-thread configuration. The single-core figures are modest in absolute terms, so lightly threaded workloads will not see the same advantage as parallel workloads.

The average benchmark score of 2012 is the summary position for this processor. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-8400H, posts an average score of 2010, a delta of 0.1 percent. The Intel Core i5-8279U posts 2005, a delta of 0.3 percent. The Intel Core i7-7920HQ posts 2004, a delta of 0.4 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H posts 2002, a delta of 0.5 percent. All four deltas are small, meaning the V1807B is essentially in the same performance band as its closest competitors rather than separated from them by a meaningful margin.

Within Cinebench R15, the multicore score of 701 versus the single-core score of 98 demonstrates old-generation scaling characteristics. Cinebench R20 repeats the pattern with 2921 multicore and 412 single-core. Cinebench R23, the most recent test in the data, shows 6957 multicore and 982 single-core. The 47th percentile rank against all CPUs reinforces the interpretation that this is a middle-of-the-pack processor: capable in multithreaded work, but not positioned near the top of the overall database.

Who Should Consider It

The V1807B is suited to workloads that can use its 4 cores and 8 threads. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score of 2921 shows measurable throughput for multithreaded creation tasks. Cinebench R23’s 6957 multicore result places it in the same neighborhood as the four nearest rivals, all of which sit within 0.5 percent of the V1807B in average score. For creation-oriented applications that scale across cores, this processor is a coherent match for that class of work.

For office-style workloads, the single-core scores are the more relevant data. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 982 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 412 indicate that the processor handles common lightly threaded desktop tasks without the headroom of a high-end desktop part, but it is by no means a weak performer in that area. The integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics also provide display output, which means office systems can be built without a discrete GPU.

For gaming, the data points in a specific direction. The CPU-side Cinebench scores place the V1807B at the 47th percentile, so it is not designed to lead in high-frame-rate scenarios. The integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 is the part of the package that determines the gaming experience, and the CPU scores suggest it is better matched to less demanding titles than to highly competitive, GPU-limited scenarios. The active production status also makes the V1807B a plausible choice for embedded systems where a consistent supply of processors matters more than peak performance.

Power and Thermals

The V1807B is specified at a TDP of 45 W. That is a moderate thermal envelope for a desktop embedded part. A capable air cooler or a well-ventilated embedded chassis should be sufficient to keep the processor within its intended thermal range. The physical data behind that TDP includes a 14 nm fabrication process, 4,950 million transistors, and a die size of 210 mm².

The multiplier is not unlocked, so there is no official overclocking path. Cooling design can therefore be based on the stock 45 W TDP rather than on overclocking headroom. The processor’s embedded positioning and active production status suggest that thermal solutions may need to account for continuous operation in compact systems, but the supplied data defines the thermal class only through the 45 W TDP and the associated process and die information.

How It Compares

Against the Intel Core i5-8400H, the V1807B is 0.1 percent ahead in average score, with 2012 versus 2010. That is a near-exact tie in the database’s summary metric, placing both processors in the same performance band.

The Intel Core i5-8279U trails by 0.3 percent, with an average score of 2005. The gap is slightly larger than the closest rival, but still marginal in practical terms. A user moving between these two parts should expect no meaningful difference in average Cinebench throughput.

The Intel Core i7-7920HQ has an average score of 2004, putting it 0.4 percent behind the V1807B. Again, the difference is small enough that individual workload behavior would matter more than this average summary.

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is the closest AMD rival in the nearest-rival list, with an average score of 2002 and a delta of 0.5 percent. Even at the largest delta in the group, the V1807B is only half a percent ahead, which makes the entire nearest-rival cluster effectively equivalent in average benchmark performance.

Platform and Compatibility

The V1807B uses AMD Socket FP5 and belongs to the Great Horned Owl generation of Ryzen Embedded processors, built on the Zen architecture. The chip is manufactured by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process, with 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. This is an embedded desktop platform rather than a mainstream consumer socket, so compatibility should be evaluated against FP5-based system designs.

Memory support is DDR4 over a dual-channel bus. The data does not list ECC as supported, with the ECC memory field marked false. The cache hierarchy is organized as 128 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 2 MB of shared L3. The integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics provide the display and graphics path, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic configurations.

No PCIe information is recorded for this part, so expansion capability cannot be quantified from the supplied data. Similarly, no other Socket FP5 processors appear in the nearest-rival list or elsewhere in the entry, so an upgrade path is not documented. The platform should be treated as defined by the V1807B itself. Production status is Active, meaning the part is listed as currently available in the data.

FAQ

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 6957, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 982.

Q: Does the V1807B support ECC memory?

A: No. The data lists ECC memory as false, and memory support is DDR4 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What socket does the V1807B use?

A: It uses AMD Socket FP5.

Q: Does the processor include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics.

Q: How close is the V1807B to the Intel Core i5-8400H?

A: The V1807B has an average score of 2012, while the Intel Core i5-8400H has an average score of 2010, a delta of 0.1 percent.

Q: Is the processor still in active production?

A: Yes, the production status is listed as Active.