AMD Phenom II X4 B93
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Phenom II X4 B93 Specifications
Phenom II X4 B93 Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD Phenom II X4 B93 features 4 physical cores and 4 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
Phenom II X4 B93 Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in Phenom II X4 B93 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Phenom II X4 B93 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's Phenom II X4 B93 Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Phenom II X4 B93 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Phenom II X4 B93's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
K10 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Phenom II X4 B93 is built on AMD's 45 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Phenom II X4 B93 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
K10 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The Phenom II X4 B93 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Phenom II X4 B93 Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD Phenom II X4 B93 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 95W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket AM3 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The Phenom II X4 B93 uses the AMD Socket AM3 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket AM3 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the Phenom II X4 B93 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Phenom II X4 B93 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
AMD's Phenom II X4 B93 Integrated Graphics
Built-in GPU specifications
The AMD Phenom II X4 B93 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Phenom II X4 B93 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.
Phenom II X4 B93 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Phenom II X4 B93 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Phenom II X4 B93 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
Phenom II X4 B93 Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD Phenom II X4 B93 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD Phenom II X4 B93. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD Phenom II X4 B93. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD Phenom II X4 B93 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD Phenom II X4 B93 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.
About AMD Phenom II X4 B93
The AMD Phenom II X4 B93 is a 4-core, 4-thread desktop processor built on the K10 architecture (codenamed Deneb) and released on September 30, 2009. It runs at a fixed base clock of 2.80 GHz with no boost capability, has a 95W TDP, and uses the AMD Socket AM3. With an average benchmark score of 631 and a percentile rank of 15 among all CPUs, this end-of-life part sits firmly in the lower performance tier, yet it remains a functional option for legacy systems and basic computing tasks.
Who Should Consider It
Benchmark results indicate that the B93 is best suited for workloads that do not demand high single-thread throughput. Its Cinebench R20 single-core score of 108 and R23 single-core score of 259 are low by modern standards, so applications like contemporary web browsers, office suites, or even older games that rely heavily on one or two threads will likely feel sluggish. The multi-core scores are comparatively stronger: Cinebench R20 multicore reaches 770, and R23 multicore reaches 1835. This suggests that the processor can make use of all four cores when a task is explicitly multi-threaded, but the absolute performance remains modest.
Given its 15th percentile ranking and end-of-life status, the B93 is not a reasonable choice for new builds. Instead, it appeals to users maintaining vintage AM3 platforms, running legacy software that predates modern instruction sets, or needing a low-cost secondary machine for word processing, spreadsheet work, or light media playback. Because the CPU itself does not include integrated graphics—though certain motherboards provide a chipset-based display output—a discrete graphics card is required for any visual output. Office productivity and simple data entry are within its reach, but video editing, 3D rendering, or modern gaming are clearly outside its capability envelope.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The split between single-core and multi-core performance is revealing. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score of 770 is roughly seven times the single-core score of 108, indicating that the processor scales well across its four physical cores. Similarly, the R23 multicore score of 1835 is about seven times the single-core score of 259. This strong scaling suggests that the K10 architecture and the shared 6 MB L3 cache allow efficient distribution of parallel workloads. However, the absolute numbers are low because the base clock of 2.80 GHz is fixed—there is no boost clock to raise frequency under light loads.
For real-world applications, this means that heavily threaded tasks such as batch photo processing or older video encoding tools will see better utilization than single-threaded tasks. Yet the lack of any turbo mechanism leaves single-thread performance strictly tied to the 2.80 GHz clock and the 45nm process, which limits instruction-per-clock efficiency. Users running modern single-threaded software will experience noticeable delays, while those who can parallelize their work across all four cores will get closer to the processor's maximum throughput—though that maximum is still far below contemporary CPUs.
Power and Thermals
The B93 is rated at a 95W TDP, a figure that places it in the mainstream power envelope of its era. On a 45nm process with 758 million transistors and a 258 mm² die, this power draw is consistent with quad-core designs from 2009. The absence of a boost clock means power consumption remains relatively stable under load, without the frequency spikes seen in modern processors. A standard air cooler—such as a tower-style heatsink or a basic downdraft unit—is sufficient to keep temperatures within safe limits. Because the processor is end-of-life, many compatible coolers are readily available on the second-hand market. The 95W TDP also implies that motherboard VRM requirements are modest, making it easy to pair with older AM3 boards that were designed for similar power levels.
Platform and Compatibility
The B93 uses the AMD Socket AM3, which natively supports both DDR2 and DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is rated at 21.3 GB/s, a figure that reflects the era's dual-channel DDR2/DDR3 controllers. This flexibility allows the processor to be installed in a wide range of AM3 motherboards, from those with DDR2 slots to newer boards with DDR3. The PCIe interface is Gen 2, which is sufficient for graphics cards of that generation but will bottleneck modern high-bandwidth GPUs. ECC memory is not supported, so the processor is not suited for error-correcting memory workloads.
The multiplier is locked, meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked by adjusting the multiplier; any frequency increase would require raising the base clock, which is less straightforward and often limited by the motherboard. The integrated graphics are not part of the CPU itself—the fact pack notes that display output is available "on certain motherboards (Chipset feature)," so a discrete GPU is generally required. As an end-of-life product, the B93 has no forward upgrade path within the AM3 platform; users seeking better performance would need to switch to a newer socket or a different platform entirely.
How It Compares
The B93's average benchmark score of 631 places it in a tight cluster with four nearest rivals, each within 1% of its performance. Against the AMD Athlon II X4 630, which scores 635, the B93 is 0.7% slower. That difference is negligible, and both processors deliver essentially identical throughput in everyday tasks. The Intel Xeon L5420, scoring 626, is 0.7% faster than the B93; this server-oriented processor edges out the B93 by a hair. The Intel Core i7-3517U, a mobile chip with a score of 636, is 0.8% slower than the B93, while the Intel Core m3-6Y30, scoring 637, is 0.9% slower. All four rivals fall within a margin that is imperceptible in real-world use. The B93's percentile rank of 15 confirms that it sits in the bottom 15% of all CPUs, but within that low tier it is effectively interchangeable with its closest competitors.
FAQ
Q: Does the Phenom II X4 B93 have integrated graphics?
A: The CPU itself does not include a graphics core. Display output is only available on certain motherboards as a chipset feature.
Q: What memory types does the B93 support?
A: It supports both DDR2 and DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a total bandwidth of 21.3 GB/s.
Q: What is the TDP of this processor?
A: The TDP is rated at 95W.
Q: Is the multiplier unlocked for overclocking?
A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking via multiplier adjustment is not possible.
Q: When was the B93 released?
A: It was released on September 30, 2009.
Q: What is the manufacturing process?
A: The processor is built on a 45nm process node.
Benchmark Performance
The B93's benchmark scores paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 184; in R20, it improves to 770; and in R23, it reaches 1835. Single-core scores are 108 in R20 and 259 in R23. These numbers indicate that while the processor can scale across its four cores, the per-core performance is extremely limited. The average benchmark score of 631, combined with a 15th percentile ranking, places the B93 among the weakest processors in the database.
Comparing to its nearest rivals, the B93 is virtually tied with all four. The Athlon II X4 630 averages 635, just 0.7% higher, while the Xeon L5420 averages 626, 0.7% lower. The Core i7-3517U averages 636 (0.8% higher) and the Core m3-6Y30 averages 637 (0.9% higher). These deltas are well within the noise of typical benchmarking, so the B93 offers no meaningful advantage or disadvantage against any of these parts. The practical takeaway is that the B93 is a competent, if unremarkable, quad-core processor from its generation—adequate for basic multi-threaded tasks but far too slow for any modern, performance-sensitive workload.
The Intel Equivalent of Phenom II X4 B93
Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-750 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.
Popular AMD Phenom II X4 B93 Comparisons
See how the Phenom II X4 B93 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Phenom II X4 B93 with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs