AMD A10-5745M

The AMD A10-5745M is a mobile processor from the Richland generation, built on the Piledriver architecture and the 32 nm process node. It is a 4-core, 4-thread part with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 2.90 GHz, operating within a 25 W TDP class. Benchmark data places this chip at the 7th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 449. This positions it as a strictly entry-level performer, trading blows with low-end desktop parts from several years prior, rather than competing with any modern mobile silicon.

Benchmark Performance

The Geekbench results for the A10-5745M are modest: a multi-core score of 619 and a single-core score of 278. The single-core figure is particularly telling, as it reveals the architectural limitations of the Piledriver cores at this clock speed. A score of 278 in single-threaded work is low even by 2013 standards, indicating that the processor will struggle with any application that relies heavily on per-thread performance, such as older games or lightly-threaded productivity software.

The multi-core score of 619 is more respectable relative to its single-core showing, but the overall average benchmark score of 449 frames the reality. This chip is not designed for sustained heavy lifting. The data shows that in multi-threaded workloads, the 4-core design does provide some benefit, but the low clock speeds and older architecture cap its potential. The average score of 449 puts it in direct competition with a cluster of older desktop chips, and the deltas to its nearest rivals are razor-thin, ranging from -0.4% to +0.4%. This means that in practical terms, the A10-5745M is statistically identical in performance to its closest competitors, and any difference in a benchmark run is likely within the margin of error.

Platform and Compatibility

The A10-5745M uses the AMD Socket FP2, which is a mobile-specific socket. This is a critical point for any potential user: this is not a desktop processor and cannot be installed on a standard AM3+ or FM2+ motherboard. The platform is built around the Richland generation, meaning it is a mature, legacy platform. Memory support is limited to DDR3, running in a dual-channel configuration. There is no support for ECC memory, which further cements its position as a consumer-grade part rather than a workstation component.

PCIe details are not available in the data, so any discussion of expansion capabilities must remain qualitative. The integrated graphics are handled by the Radeon HD 8610G, which is a notable feature for a chip of this class. The lack of a dedicated L3 cache is also a factor; the cache layout is 128 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with no shared L3. This architecture places a premium on memory bandwidth, which the dual-channel DDR3 support addresses, but it does not fully compensate for the absence of a large, fast shared cache. The upgrade path is essentially non-existent; the FP2 socket was not a long-lived platform, and any user on this socket is already at the end of the road for CPU upgrades.

How It Compares

AMD A4-5300B: The A4-5300B is the exact peer of the A10-5745M, with an identical average score of 449 and a delta of 0%. This is a statistical tie. The A4-5300B is a desktop part, but the benchmark data shows that the mobile A10-5745M delivers the same level of performance. This is a sobering comparison: a mobile chip with a 25 W TDP is matching a desktop chip with a higher power envelope, but neither is a performance powerhouse.

Intel Celeron G1620T: The Celeron G1620T scores 448, which is 0.3% behind the A10-5745M. This delta is negligible, placing the two chips in the same performance tier. The Celeron is a dual-core part, yet it matches the quad-core AMD in average score. This highlights the single-core strength of the Intel architecture, which compensates for its lower core count. For a user, this means that the A10-5745M offers no real advantage over a low-end Intel Celeron in general mixed workloads.

Intel Core i3-540: The Core i3-540 scores 451, which is 0.4% ahead of the A10-5745M. This is an older desktop dual-core with Hyper-Threading, and it still edges out the AMD mobile chip. The delta is small, but the i3-540's lead in single-core performance is likely what pushes its average score higher. This comparison shows that the A10-5745M is not competitive even with early-2010s Intel dual-core processors with multi-threading enabled.

AMD A6-5400K: The A6-5400K scores 447, which is 0.4% behind the A10-5745M. This is another desktop part, and the delta is effectively zero. The A6-5400K is a dual-core module-based chip, while the A10-5745M has four physical cores. The benchmark data shows that the extra cores in the A10-5745M do not translate into a meaningful performance lead, likely because the A6-5400K operates at higher clock speeds. This reinforces the idea that the A10-5745M's performance is constrained by its clock speed and architecture, not its core count.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD A10-5745M?

A: The average benchmark score is 449, which places it at the 7th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the A10-5745M compare to the Intel Core i3-540?

A: The Intel Core i3-540 has an average score of 451, which is 0.4% higher than the A10-5745M's score.

Q: Does the A10-5745M have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported by the processor's design.

Q: What integrated graphics does this processor feature?

A: It features the Radeon HD 8610G integrated graphics.

Q: What type of memory does the A10-5745M support?

A: It supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration, without ECC support.

Q: What is the process node for this chip?

A: The A10-5745M is manufactured on a 32 nm process node, with a die size of 246 mm².

Power and Thermals

The A10-5745M is rated for a 25 W TDP, which is a low-power classification for a quad-core processor. This is the defining characteristic of this chip: it is engineered for efficiency, not performance. The 32 nm process node is relatively old, and the Piledriver architecture is not known for its power efficiency, so achieving a 25 W TDP requires significant clock speed sacrifices. The base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 2.90 GHz are modest, and the data suggests that the chip likely spends most of its time at the lower end of that range under sustained load.

For cooling, this TDP class implies that a basic, low-profile cooler is sufficient. The thermal output is low enough that a small notebook or thin-and-light laptop fan can handle it without issue. There is no need for a large heatsink or a high-end cooling solution. In practical terms, this means that a laptop equipped with this chip should run quietly and remain cool to the touch during typical office or web browsing workloads, though sustained heavy loads may cause the fans to spin up. The lack of a dedicated L3 cache and the reliance on dual-channel memory bandwidth also mean that the memory controller is a potential source of heat, but still within a manageable range for the 25 W class.

Who Should Consider It

The A10-5745M is a processor for basic, everyday tasks. The Geekbench single-core score of 278 indicates that it is suitable for light productivity, such as word processing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing, where the primary bottleneck is not raw CPU muscle. The multi-core score of 619 suggests that it can handle some light multitasking, like having a few browser tabs open alongside a document editor, but it will struggle with anything more demanding.

For gaming, this chip is not a viable option for modern titles. The integrated Radeon HD 8610G graphics can handle older or less demanding games at low settings, but the low single-core performance will be a limiting factor in most game engines. The 7th percentile ranking confirms that this is not a processor for enthusiasts or content creators. Video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation are all out of its reach; the multi-core score is simply too low for such workloads. The processor is best suited for a secondary or budget laptop used for email, web access, and document editing, where its low power draw is an asset. Its performance parity with the desktop AMD A4-5300B and Intel Celeron G1620T underscores that it belongs to a legacy tier of computing, not a modern one.