Intel Core i5-14450HX vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core i5-14450HX is extensive, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 currently has no benchmark scores listed in the database. The Intel part posts an average benchmark score of 32040, which places it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. That percentile figure is a strong indicator of overall positioning, as it sits well above the midpoint of the database distribution.

Looking at the Intel processor's individual results, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20108 demonstrates substantial throughput for multithreaded workloads. The single-core score of 2838 in the same test shows that the P-core design handles lightly threaded tasks effectively. In Cinebench R20, the Intel chip records 8445 points multicore and 1191 points single-core, while the older R15 test shows 2026 and 285 points respectively. These three generations of Cinebench results paint a consistent picture of a processor that scales well across both heavily parallel and single-threaded applications.

The PassMark suite adds further detail. The Intel Core i5-14450HX achieves a PassMark single-thread score of 3643 and a multithread score of 23680. Integer math workloads score 78330, while floating-point math reaches 58037. Data encryption is handled at 15574, and extended instruction performance is 17207. Random string sorting completes at 29565, and data compression scores 278538. The find prime numbers test returns a score of 98, while the physics test scores 1475.

Because the Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has no recorded benchmark results, direct head-to-head comparisons cannot be constructed from the database. The Intel processor's nearest rivals are all Intel parts with similar average scores. The Core i7-13705H averages 32076, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14450HX. The Core i5-14400 averages 32115, a 0.2% advantage. The Core i7-12800H averages 32121, 0.3% ahead, and the Core i9-11900 averages 32226, 0.6% ahead. These margins are negligible, indicating that the i5-14450HX performs essentially identically to those four established desktop and mobile processors.

The Snapdragon chip sits at the 50th percentile, which is the median position in the database, but with an average benchmark score of zero due to missing data. That percentile value suggests the database places it in the middle of the distribution, yet without actual scores, this cannot be verified through direct measurements.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14450HX compare to the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel processor has a full set of benchmark results with an average score of 32040 and a percentile rank of 82. The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, so no direct numeric comparison between the two is possible from the available data.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 also has 10 cores but only 10 threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each chip?

A: The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Snapdragon has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, but no boost clock value is listed in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher thermal design power?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has a TDP of 55 watts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has a TDP of 35 watts, which is lower by 20 watts.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The Snapdragon chip supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has an unlocked multiplier. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 does not have an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-14450HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's own foundry. The die size is recorded at 257 mm². The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 uses the Oryon codename with a Snapdragon X (Plus) generation label, built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. No die size is recorded for the Snapdragon part.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The Intel processor uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon chip uses 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel design places more L3 cache at the chip level, while the Qualcomm design allocates substantially more L1 cache per core and a larger L2 allocation per module.

The Intel processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The Snapdragon chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU-only lanes. This represents a generational difference in interconnect speed and lane count.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 710. The Snapdragon chip uses Adreno X1-85. The Intel processor supports ECC memory, while the Snapdragon part does not.

The Intel chip is manufactured at Intel's foundry on a 10 nm process. The Snapdragon chip is manufactured at TSMC on a 4 nm process. The smaller process node likely contributes to the Snapdragon's lower TDP of 35 watts compared to the Intel chip's 55 watts, though the database does not explicitly state this causal relationship.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications. The Intel Core i5-14450HX has 16 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has 10 threads. The Intel chip has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Snapdragon chip has a base clock of 3.40 GHz with no boost clock listed.

TDP differs by 20 watts: 55 watts for Intel versus 35 watts for Qualcomm. The socket types are different, with the Intel part using Intel BGA 1964 and the Qualcomm part using Qualcomm BGA 2073.

The process node is 10 nm for Intel and 4 nm for Qualcomm, with correspondingly different foundries: Intel for the former, TSMC for the latter.

Memory support differs: DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel, LPDDR5X for Qualcomm. The Snapdragon chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is listed for the Intel part.

PCIe support differs: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel, Gen 4 with 12 lanes for Qualcomm. ECC memory support is present on Intel but absent on Qualcomm.

The multiplier is unlocked on the Intel processor and locked on the Qualcomm processor. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 710 for Intel and Adreno X1-85 for Qualcomm.

The release dates differ, with the Intel chip released on 2024-01-07 and the Qualcomm chip released on 2024-04-23. The Intel part number is SRMXK, while the Qualcomm part number is X1P64100.

The Intel processor belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, while no series is listed for the Qualcomm processor. The Intel architecture is recorded as Raptor Lake, while the Qualcomm architecture field is null, with only the Oryon codename provided.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split in intended use cases. The Intel Core i5-14450HX delivers measurable performance across a full suite of benchmarks. Its average benchmark score of 32040 and 82nd percentile ranking place it among the stronger mobile processors in the database. The nearest rivals, all within 0.6% of its average score, confirm that it performs at a level consistent with established high-end mobile and desktop parts.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 presents a different profile. With no benchmark scores recorded, its performance cannot be quantified from the database. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests a mid-pack position, but the zero average score means this ranking lacks supporting measured data.

For users who require immediately verifiable performance, the Intel chip is the only one with recorded results. Its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, support both multithreaded and single-threaded workloads. The unlocked multiplier adds flexibility for those who adjust clock settings.

The Snapdragon chip offers a lower TDP of 35 watts, which may appeal to systems prioritizing power efficiency. Its 10 cores and 10 threads, base clock of 3.40 GHz, and 4 nm process node indicate a modern design, but without benchmark data, its real-world performance remains unquantified in the database.

The Intel chip's support for ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes positions it for workloads that value data integrity and high-speed connectivity. The Snapdragon chip's LPDDR5X memory support with 135.2 GB/s bandwidth and PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes serve a different connectivity profile.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14450HX wins in every category where measured data exists. The Cinebench scores across R15, R20, and R23 all demonstrate strong multicore and single-core capability. The PassMark suite shows particular strength in integer math at 78330 and data compression at 278538, suggesting good performance in productivity and content creation tasks.

The Intel chip's 16 threads versus the Snapdragon's 10 threads gives it an advantage in heavily threaded workloads, provided the software can use the additional threads. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz also benefits bursty single-threaded tasks.

The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 wins in power efficiency on paper. Its 35 watt TDP is 20 watts lower than the Intel chip's 55 watt TDP. The 4 nm process node from TSMC is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node, which typically correlates with better efficiency per operation.

The Snapdragon chip also holds advantages in specific recorded specifications. Its memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s is explicitly listed, while the Intel chip has no memory bandwidth figure recorded. The L1 cache of 288 KB per core is larger than the Intel's 80 KB per core, and the L2 cache of 12 MB per module exceeds the Intel's 2 MB per core allocation.

For users prioritizing raw performance with verifiable numbers, the Intel Core i5-14450HX is the clear selection. For users prioritizing low power consumption and a smaller process node, the Snapdragon X1P-64-100 offers those attributes, though its actual performance remains unmeasured in the database.