AMD Ryzen 5 240 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 240 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do their clock speeds compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 240 has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: What process node technology do they use?

A: Both processors are fabricated on a 4 nm process node, and both are manufactured by TSMC.

Q: How much cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 240 has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 288 KB L1 per core, 12 MB L2 per module, and 6 MB shared L3.

Q: What memory types and bandwidth do they support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 240 supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel bus and 135.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are their TDP ratings?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 240 has a TDP of 45 watts. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a TDP of 30 watts.

Q: How do they rank in the overall CPU percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 240 ranks in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The data shows a clear split between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 dominates in CPU compute workloads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 offers advantages in specific system-level attributes.

The AMD Ryzen 5 240 wins on raw processing capability. Its benchmark results show strong multi-core performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,013 and a single-core score of 1,742. The PassMark suite further confirms this, with high scores in integer math (73,189), floating point math (45,301), and multithread (22,658). The 84th percentile ranking versus all CPUs places it well above the Snapdragon's 50th percentile.

The AMD part also wins on thread count, offering 12 threads versus 8, and has a higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus 4.00 GHz. Its base clock of 4.30 GHz is also substantially higher. The AMD processor includes a Radeon 760M integrated GPU, while the Snapdragon uses an Adreno X1-45.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 wins on power efficiency. Its TDP of 30 watts is lower than the AMD's 45 watts, indicating lower power draw. It also offers a higher memory bandwidth at 135.2 GB/s compared to 89.6 GB/s. The Snapdragon has more cores at 8 versus 6, though it lacks hyperthreading, and its L2 cache structure is larger at 12 MB per module versus 1 MB per core.

The Snapdragon also uses a different memory type, LPDDR5X, which is designed for mobile power savings. Its PCIe configuration is Gen 4 with 12 lanes, fewer than the AMD's 20 lanes, but this is balanced by the lower power envelope.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename "Hawk Point," part of the Ryzen 5 generation. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses the Oryon codename under the Snapdragon X generation, specifically the Plus variant.

Both are built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, but that is where the fabrication similarities end. The AMD part has a die size of 178 mm² and contains 25,000 million transistors. The Snapdragon's die size and transistor count are not recorded in the database.

Cache hierarchy differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 uses a per-core L1 of 64 KB and per-core L2 of 1 MB, with a shared 16 MB L3. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses a larger per-core L1 of 288 KB and a per-module L2 of 12 MB, with a smaller shared L3 of 6 MB. This suggests different approaches to data locality and inter-core communication.

The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory, while the Snapdragon supports LPDDR5X. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the Snapdragon's memory bandwidth is higher at 135.2 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. The AMD part has more PCIe lanes at 20 (Gen 4) versus 12 (Gen 4) for the Snapdragon.

Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. The integrated graphics differ as well: Radeon 760M for AMD and Adreno X1-45 for Qualcomm.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications reveal several direct differences between the two processors.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 240 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 4.30 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 30 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Oryon |

| Generation | Ryzen 5 (Zen 4) | Snapdragon X (Plus) |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | Not recorded |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 12 MB per module |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 4, 12 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M | Adreno X1-45 |

| Part Number | 100-000001727 | X1P46100 |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-09-02 |

The AMD processor has a higher clock speed on both base and boost, more threads, a larger L3 cache, and more PCIe lanes. The Qualcomm part has more cores, a larger per-core L1, a larger per-module L2, higher memory bandwidth, and a lower TDP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen 5 240 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100. However, the AMD processor has a full set of benchmark results recorded, while the Qualcomm part has no benchmark scores listed at all.

The AMD Ryzen 5 240's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 13,013 and single-core is 1,742. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,078 multi-core and 270 single-core. These figures indicate strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance for a mobile processor.

PassMark results for the AMD part show a wide range of compute capabilities. Integer math scores 73,189, floating point math scores 45,301, and extended instructions score 20,201. Data compression scores 267,963 and data encryption scores 15,849. Find prime numbers scores 70, and random string sorting scores 32,385. Physics scores 1,060, multithread scores 22,658, and single-thread scores 3,675.

The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen 5 240 is 33,542. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H with an average score of 33,537 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS with 33,667 (-0.4% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX with 33,668 (-0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i5-12600HX with 33,375 (0.5% delta). This places the Ryzen 5 240 in a competitive position, essentially tied with these alternatives.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no recorded benchmark scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking versus all CPUs indicates a mid-range position, but without direct measurements, the data cannot confirm its absolute performance level.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion for different usage scenarios. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 demonstrates comprehensive benchmark coverage with strong scores across all recorded tests. Its 84th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 33,542 indicate a high-performance mobile processor. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it an advantage in both multithreaded and single-threaded tasks.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 offers no recorded benchmark results, making direct performance comparison impossible from the database. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests mid-range positioning, and its specifications point to a power-efficient design with a 30-watt TDP and LPDDR5X memory support.

For workloads that demand raw compute, the AMD Ryzen 5 240 is the only option with verified performance data. The benchmark results indicate strong integer and floating point math performance, high data compression and encryption throughput, and solid single-thread scores. The 12 threads provide better parallel processing capability than the Snapdragon's 8 threads.

For power-sensitive mobile use, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a 15-watt lower TDP and higher memory bandwidth. Its 8 cores without hyperthreading may handle independent tasks efficiently, and the larger L2 per module could benefit workloads with high locality. The 288 KB L1 per core is substantially larger than the AMD's 64 KB per core.

The AMD processor's higher PCIe lane count (20 versus 12) supports more expansion capability, while the Snapdragon's memory bandwidth advantage (135.2 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s) favors memory-intensive tasks. Neither processor offers ECC memory or an unlocked multiplier.

Users requiring verified high-end compute performance should select the AMD Ryzen 5 240. Its benchmark scores and percentile ranking confirm its capability. Users prioritizing lower power draw and higher memory bandwidth, with acceptable mid-range performance, may consider the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, but the absence of recorded benchmarks means its actual compute performance remains unverified in the database.