AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT enters the database with an average benchmark score of 29,879, placing it in the 81st percentile among all CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0. This is not a contest where both sides have measurable data; the 5800XT is the only processor in this comparison with recorded performance results.

The 5800XT posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,794 and a single-core score of 3,359. In Cinebench R20, it delivers 9,993 multi-core and 1,410 single-core points. The 3DMark results show a clear scaling pattern: 1,879 in the 2-thread test, 3,603 in the 4-thread test, 6,141 in the 8-thread test, and 7,683 in the 16-thread test, nearly matching the 7,680 max-thread score. The single-thread 3DMark score of 959 is the lowest recorded result for this processor, which is expected given the test's design.

PassMark results reinforce the same conclusion. The 5800XT scores 28,053 in multithread and 3,535 in single-thread tests. In specific workloads, it records 93,942 in integer math, 53,808 in floating-point math, 35,911 in random string sorting, 352,002 in data compression, and 21,461 in data encryption. The extended instructions test yields 24,270, while the find prime numbers test returns a notably low 119.

The closest rivals in the database for the 5800XT are all AMD parts. The Ryzen 7 7840H averages 29,868, a delta of 0%. The Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS both average 29,955, with the 5800XT trailing by 0.3%. The Ryzen 5 9600X averages 29,713, with the 5800XT ahead by 0.6%. The performance spread among these four processors is minimal, confirming that the 5800XT sits in a tightly contested band of mid-range hardware.

The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has no benchmark entries in the database, no nearest rivals, and no average score to compare. Any head-to-head analysis must therefore rely on architectural specifications rather than measured performance. The 5800XT wins every measurable benchmark category by default, but the more instructive comparison lies in what each processor is designed to do.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT uses the Zen 3 architecture under the Vermeer codename, built on a 7 nm TSMC process. It contains 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The transistor count is 4,150 million on a die size of 74 mm². The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 uses the Oryon codename, built on a 4 nm TSMC process, and contains 12 cores with 12 threads. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz and its boost clock is 4.00 GHz. The 4 nm process node gives the Snapdragon a manufacturing advantage, but the database records no transistor count or die size for this part.

Cache configurations differ sharply. The 5800XT provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 provides 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part's larger L3 pool is significant for workloads that repeatedly access a working set larger than 6 MB. The Snapdragon's larger per-core L1 and module-level L2 reflect a different design philosophy, one aimed at power efficiency rather than raw throughput.

Memory support also diverges. The 5800XT uses DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth and supports ECC memory. The Snapdragon uses LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 135.2 GB/s of bandwidth and does not support ECC. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth is roughly 2.6 times higher, a direct consequence of the mobile LPDDR5X standard. The 5800XT's ECC support, absent on the Snapdragon, matters for systems where data integrity is a requirement.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The 5800XT offers Gen 4 with 20 CPU-only lanes, while the Snapdragon offers Gen 4 with 12 CPU-only lanes. The 5800XT has more headroom for expansion cards, storage, and other peripherals. The Snapdragon includes an integrated Adreno X1-85 GPU; the 5800XT has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

The 5800XT has an unlocked multiplier, making it configurable for overclocking. The Snapdragon is locked. The 5800XT uses AMD Socket AM4, a desktop platform. The Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2073, a soldered mobile package. The 5800XT is a desktop part with a TDP of 105 W; the Snapdragon is a mobile part with a TDP of 35 W. The power envelope difference is substantial, with the Snapdragon consuming roughly one-third the power budget of the 5800XT.

The 5800XT was released on 2024-07-30 with a launch MSRP of $249. The Snapdragon was released earlier, on 2024-04-23, with no launch MSRP recorded. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT wins in every scenario where measured performance matters. Its 16 threads give it a clear advantage in multithreaded workloads, as shown by the 3DMark scaling from 1,879 at 2 threads to 7,683 at 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,794 confirms strong rendering performance. The PassMark multithread score of 28,053 and the integer math score of 93,942 indicate solid general-purpose compute ability. The 5800XT also wins on platform flexibility: it supports ECC memory, has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and features an unlocked multiplier. For desktop users who need a CPU that can be tuned and paired with a wide range of components, the 5800XT is the only option in this comparison with recorded evidence of capability.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 wins where efficiency and integration are the priorities. Its 35 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 5800XT's 105 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light mobile systems where heat and battery life dominate. The 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than double the 5800XT's 51.2 GB/s, which benefits memory-bound tasks. The integrated Adreno X1-85 GPU eliminates the need for a discrete graphics card, a requirement for the 5800XT. The 4 nm process node and 12-core design suggest an emphasis on sustained performance within a constrained power budget. The Snapdragon's 12 MB L2 per module and 288 KB L1 per core indicate a cache hierarchy tuned for the latency characteristics of mobile workloads.

The benchmark data does not include any scores for the Snapdragon, so its wins are structural rather than measured. The database records no performance results for this part, which means any claim about its speed must be inferred from its specifications and market segment.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29,879. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: How do the core and thread counts differ?

A: The 5800XT has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part uses simultaneous multithreading to reach 16 threads; the Snapdragon does not.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The 5800XT supports DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 supports LPDDR5X with 135.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT supports ECC memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 does not.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 includes an Adreno X1-85 integrated GPU. The 5800XT has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU.

Q: What are the TDP values for each processor?

A: The 5800XT has a TDP of 105 W. The Snapdragon X1E-80-100 has a TDP of 35 W.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is the processor to choose for desktop workloads where measured performance, expansion capability, and configurability are the deciding factors. Its 81st percentile ranking, 16 threads, 32 MB of shared L3 cache, ECC support, 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and unlocked multiplier make it a versatile part for systems that need proven compute throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,794 and PassMark multithread score of 28,053 are the strongest recorded results in this comparison.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 is the processor to choose for mobile systems where power consumption, memory bandwidth, and integration take priority over raw compute. Its 35 W TDP, 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and integrated Adreno X1-85 GPU are the defining traits. The 50th percentile ranking reflects the absence of recorded benchmark data, not a measured performance level. The 12-core, 12-thread design and 4 nm process node position it as a power-efficient part, but the database contains no scores to validate its speed.

The 5800XT leads in every benchmark category recorded, every platform feature that matters for desktop expansion, and every metric of measured compute performance. The Snapdragon leads in power efficiency, memory bandwidth, and integrated graphics capability. These are different products for different environments, and the recorded data only supports performance claims for one of them.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1E-80-100 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| TDP | 105 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Codename | Vermeer | Oryon |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 4,150 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 74 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 12 MB per module |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Adreno X1-85 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2024-07-30 | 2024-04-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $249 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | 100-000001582 | X1E80100 |