Intel Xeon E-2276G vs Intel Xeon W-1290TE Comparison

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Xeon W-1290TE wins every single recorded benchmark matchup against the Intel Xeon E-2276G. Across six head-to-head tests, the W-1290TE claims all six wins, with deltas ranging from 2.0% to 2.3%. The E-2276G does not take a single benchmark victory in the database. For any workload captured by Cinebench R15, R20, or R23, the W-1290TE is the faster processor.

The W-1290TE’s multi-core advantage stems from its core and thread count: 10 cores and 20 threads versus the E-2276G’s 6 cores and 12 threads. Yet the margin is narrower than the core count suggests, because the E-2276G fights back with a higher boost clock (4.90 GHz versus 4.50 GHz) and a higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 1800.00 MHz). The result is a consistent, but modest, 2% to 2.3% lead for the W-1290TE across all recorded tests.

Who should pick which? The W-1290TE is the choice for users who prioritize raw multi-threaded throughput and lower power draw, as it delivers superior Cinebench scores while consuming only 35 W TDP versus the E-2276G’s 80 W TDP. The E-2276G, despite its benchmark losses, remains relevant for single-thread-sensitive tasks due to its higher clocks, though the recorded data shows the W-1290TE also leads in every single-core test. The E-2276G is end-of-life, while the W-1290TE is active in production, which matters for long-term availability. There is no benchmark-based argument for the E-2276G in this comparison; the W-1290TE is simply the faster chip in every measured scenario.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and microarchitectures. The E-2276G is part of the Xeon E-2200 series, built on Coffee Lake (codename Coffee Lake-S WS), and belongs to the Xeon E (Coffee Lake) generation. The W-1290TE is a Comet Lake part, belonging to the Xeon (Comet Lake) generation. Both are fabricated on Intel’s 14 nm process node, but the die sizes differ: the E-2276G measures 154 mm², while the W-1290TE is larger at 206 mm².

Core and cache configurations are the major architectural split. The E-2276G has 6 cores and 12 threads, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The W-1290TE doubles the core count to 10 cores and 20 threads, and its shared L3 cache grows to 20 MB. Both have per-core L1 cache of 64 KB and per-core L2 cache of 256 KB, so the per-core hierarchy is identical; the difference is in total core count and aggregate L3.

Memory support is similar: both use DDR4, both are dual-channel, and both support ECC memory. The memory bandwidth differs slightly, with the E-2276G rated at 42.7 GB/s and the W-1290TE at 46.9 GB/s. PCIe support is identical on paper: Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are present on both, but they differ in branding: the E-2276G uses HD Graphics P630, while the W-1290TE uses Intel UHD Graphics P630.

Sockets are incompatible: the E-2276G uses Intel Socket 1151, while the W-1290TE uses Intel Socket 1200. Clock speeds tell a contrasting story. The E-2276G has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the W-1290TE has a base clock of 1800.00 MHz (1.80 GHz) and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The E-2276G is therefore clocked higher at both ends, but the W-1290TE compensates with more cores and a larger cache.

Power characteristics differ substantially: the E-2276G has a TDP of 80 W, while the W-1290TE draws only 35 W. Release timing also separates them: the E-2276G launched on 2019-05-28, the W-1290TE on 2020-05-12. The E-2276G is marked as end-of-life, while the W-1290TE is active. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a complete sweep for the W-1290TE. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the W-1290TE scores 1230 against the E-2276G’s 1205, a 2% lead. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the W-1290TE scores 173 against 169, a 2.3% advantage. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20: multi-core shows 5129 versus 5021 (2.1% lead for the W-1290TE), and single-core shows 724 versus 708 (2.2% lead). Cinebench R23 continues the trend: multi-core scores 12213 versus 11957 (2.1% lead), and single-core scores 1724 versus 1688 (2.1% lead).

The largest single delta is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the W-1290TE is 2.3% ahead. All other deltas are 2.0% or 2.1%, indicating a remarkably consistent performance gap across different rendering workloads and thread counts. The E-2276G’s higher clocks (4.90 GHz boost versus 4.50 GHz) do not translate into a single-core win; the W-1290TE’s newer Comet Lake architecture and larger cache appear to offset the clock disadvantage.

Beyond the head-to-head, the W-1290TE also holds an edge in Geekbench, though this test is only recorded for the E-2276G in the database. The E-2276G’s Geekbench multi-core score is 6551 and single-core is 1610. The W-1290TE has no Geekbench entry in the recorded data, so a direct comparison is not possible for that test.

The average benchmark score tells a different story at a broader level. The E-2276G has an average benchmark score of 3614, while the W-1290TE averages 3532. This is because the E-2276G’s average includes Geekbench scores, which are higher in absolute terms than Cinebench scores. Both CPUs sit at the 55th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The E-2276G’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 (avg score 3613, delta 0%), the Intel Xeon E-2286G (3610, delta 0.1%), the Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 (3608, delta 0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E (3603, delta 0.3%). The W-1290TE’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-12300 (3532, delta 0%), the Intel Core i5-10600K (3533, delta 0%), the Intel Xeon W-2135 (3530, delta 0.1%), and the Intel Core i3-12300T (3525, delta 0.2%).

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Xeon W-1290TE wins all three multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 1230 versus 1205 in R15, 5129 versus 5021 in R20, and 12213 versus 11957 in R23. The lead is consistent at 2.0% to 2.1%.

Q: Which processor has the higher clock speed?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276G has the higher clocks. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz and boost clock is 4.90 GHz. The W-1290TE has a base clock of 1800.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Does the W-1290TE also win in single-core tests?

A: Yes. The W-1290TE wins every single-core Cinebench test: R15 (173 versus 169, 2.3% lead), R20 (724 versus 708, 2.2% lead), and R23 (1724 versus 1688, 2.1% lead).

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The W-1290TE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The E-2276G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The W-1290TE also has more shared L3 cache: 20 MB versus 12 MB.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: The W-1290TE has a TDP of 35 W, while the E-2276G has a TDP of 80 W. The W-1290TE delivers higher benchmark scores while drawing less than half the TDP.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No. The E-2276G is end-of-life, while the W-1290TE is active in production. The E-2276G launched on 2019-05-28, and the W-1290TE launched on 2020-05-12.

Where Each One Wins

The W-1290TE wins in every recorded benchmark category. In multi-threaded rendering, it leads across all three Cinebench versions: R15 multi-core (1230 versus 1205), R20 multi-core (5129 versus 5021), and R23 multi-core (12213 versus 11957). For single-threaded workloads, the W-1290TE also prevails: R15 single-core (173 versus 169), R20 single-core (724 versus 708), and R23 single-core (1724 versus 1688). The W-1290TE is therefore the pick for any workload measured by these tests, whether it scales across cores or runs on a single thread.

The E-2276G has no benchmark wins in the recorded data. Its case rests on non-benchmark factors. It has a higher boost clock (4.90 GHz versus 4.50 GHz) and a higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 1800.00 MHz), which could theoretically benefit workloads not captured by Cinebench, though no recorded test confirms this. It also has a smaller die (154 mm² versus 206 mm²) and uses Socket 1151, which may be relevant for existing platform compatibility. Its launch MSRP is $362, compared to the W-1290TE’s launch MSRP of $552.

For users prioritizing power efficiency, the W-1290TE is the clear winner: it outperforms the E-2276G in all tests while drawing 35 W TDP versus 80 W. For users prioritizing platform availability, the W-1290TE is active in production, while the E-2276G is end-of-life. The data shows no scenario in the recorded benchmarks where the E-2276G comes out ahead.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2276G | Intel Xeon W-1290TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | Xeon E-2200 series | Not specified |

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 1800.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 80 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Coffee Lake-S WS | Comet Lake |

| Generation | Xeon E (Coffee Lake) | Xeon (Comet Lake) |

| Die Size | 154 mm² | 206 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics P630 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-05-28 | 2020-05-12 |

| Launch MSRP | $362 | $552 |

| Part Number | SR3WS | SRJFH |

The two processors share several specifications: both are 14 nm, both support DDR4 memory with dual-channel buses, both support ECC memory, both use Gen 3 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only), both have 64 KB L1 cache per core, both have 256 KB L2 cache per core, both are Intel parts, both target the server/workstation market segment, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The differences listed above are the only fields where the two diverge in the recorded data.