CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9384X

CORE STATE Genoa-X

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo

CACHE 768 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 320W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6780E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 144 Cores / 144 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 108 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 330W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

5,968

7,431

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

842

1,049

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

24,870

30,963

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,510

4,371

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

59,215

73,723

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

8,359

N/A

passmark_data_compression

1,119,983

2,557,582

passmark_data_encryption

72,631

193,004

passmark_extended_instructions

74,363

114,008

passmark_find_prime_numbers

596

708

passmark_floating_point_math

174,630

433,862

passmark_integer_math

297,833

641,817

passmark_multithread

69,665

86,734

passmark_physics

9,332

10,951

passmark_random_string_sorting

119,440

326,954

passmark_single_thread

3,015

1,923

passmark_singlethread

3,015

1,923

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9384X vs Intel Xeon 6780E

Examining the test numbers for AMD EPYC 9384X by AMD and 6780E by Intel, the pattern of matched processing emerges. No CPU wins repeatedly over every tests. The trading of wins means inherent equivalence. Those have a real decision with these options. The two processors deliver strong throughput.

Playing games benchmarks likewise show competitive performance between AMD EPYC 9384X by AMD and 6780E by Intel. Frame rates variations generally fall within margin of error. The minor differences are hardly detectable during everyday play sessions. Each options offer capable gaming. Gaming enthusiasts might pick safely between them.

The bottom line: AMD EPYC 9384X by AMD and 6780E by Intel are similarly balanced. No earns a obvious preference over the competitor. Have price and platform preferences influence your concluding choice. Either processors can meet you effectively. This is a win-win decision.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9384X

6780E

Core Specs

Cores

144 +350.0%

Threads

144 +125.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.1

2.2 -29.0%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.9

3 -23.1%

Frequency (GHz)

3.1

2.2 -29.0%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.9

3 -23.1%

Multiplier

25.5

22 -13.7%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

768 MB (shared)

108 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

320

330 +3.1%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Sierra Forest

Codename

Genoa-X

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

90,160 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$5529

$11350

Part Number

—

SRPG3

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

None

View EPYC 9384X Details View Xeon 6780E Details