CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9654

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 96 Cores / 192 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 384 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6745P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 336 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 300W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

10,248

7,214

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,446

1,018

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

42,703

30,062

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

6,028

4,244

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

101,675

71,578

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

14,354

N/A

passmark_data_compression

N/A

1,352,801

passmark_data_encryption

N/A

66,665

passmark_extended_instructions

N/A

108,326

passmark_find_prime_numbers

N/A

681

passmark_floating_point_math

N/A

267,438

passmark_integer_math

N/A

336,926

passmark_multithread

N/A

84,210

passmark_physics

N/A

6,144

passmark_random_string_sorting

N/A

133,528

passmark_single_thread

N/A

3,450

passmark_singlethread

N/A

3,450

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Xeon 6745P

Reviewing the test figures for AMD EPYC 9654 (AMD) and Xeon 6745P, a trend of similar capability unfolds. Not one option leads repeatedly over the workloads. The swapping of advantages suggests underlying equivalence. Consumers encounter a true choice between them. Both chips achieve strong results.

Considering a specification angle, AMD EPYC 9654 (AMD) and Xeon 6745P possess matching capabilities. Execution setups, clock speeds, and L3 sizes are virtually comparable. The technical parity explains the close performance data. Not one holds a considerable technical advantage. This playing field is even.

No chip maintains a clear superiority in this matchup. AMD EPYC 9654 (AMD) beats marginally in some scenarios, while Xeon 6745P wins alternative tests. This trading dynamic indicates inherent equality between these two. The gaps are minor and potentially imperceptible in real-world tasks. The two achieve solid throughput.

When people undecided between AMD EPYC 9654 (AMD) and Xeon 6745P, rest comfortable that either pick provides equivalent throughput. The benchmark data validates nil decisive champion. Base your decision on alternative variables and enjoy strong throughput regardless. Each are capable in their own sense. Choose assuredly.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9654

6745P

Core Specs

Cores

32 -66.7%

Threads

192

64 -66.7%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

3.1 +29.2%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.3 +16.2%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

3.1 +29.2%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.3 +16.2%

Multiplier

31 +29.2%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

384 MB (shared)

336 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

300 -16.7%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Genoa

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

78,840 million

—

Die Size

12x 72 mm²

2x 598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$11805

$5250

Part Number

100-100000789

SRWPAQ7L9

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

97°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9654 Details View Xeon 6745P Details